Who was the most evil person in history? Who's actions had

File: Churchill-428016.jpg (58KB, 590x617px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 590x617px

>>1176389
The bombings on german civilians was pretty horrible. Hamburg, dresded and berlin being the largest I think. children, babies, mothers, burned alive in a blazing inferno.. And after that Bolsheviks came in raping an estimated 2million woman and children.

Stalin is prob the most known evil but Churchill is the lesser known evil

Napoleon, easily.

>muh equality xD

>>1176389
Jews, collectively.

>>1176618
t. the eternal kraut

Ran Min

Marx

Define evil.

> Who was the most evil person in history?
Hard to say.
> Who's actions had the worst consequences for humanity?
I would say Stalin. He single-handedly wasted the twentieth century.
But Genghis can compete for that title, if we blame him for the plague.

>>1176795
Why is Lenin not culpable for wasting the twentieth century as well?

>>1176618

Churchill was a cunt, no doubt. Also breathtakingly incompetent as a military commander

>>1176801
Because for all their mistakes, the Bolcheviks' attempt at creating a socialist system was instructive for all humanity, and all in all not too destructive to the Russians.
Experimentation is good. Stalin put a stop to that, and that's one of his longest-lasting crimes.

>>1176389

>whose actions had the worst consequences for humanity?

Marx, bar none. This isn't even a contest.

The person who said "Women are just as smart as men, you guys."

>>1176900
>the Bolcheviks' attempt at creating a socialist system

They quite literally shut down all the systems which were making attempts to develop a workers' state, even the Soviets themselves, in favor of centralization of the means of production to the party. It was never a real movement, just a successful power grab.

>>1176900

Just because it's edgy and goes against the grain doesn't mean it's not retarded

>>1176915
This is factually true thought.

File: 1463468610494.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

>Universal, unweighted suffrage was a good idea

As far as my knowledge goes it has to be Stalin. It might happen that his personality has been over exaggerated during the cold war but reading testimonies like how he would rescue a stranded calf then just break its legs right after makes me believe he was just a fucking psycho.

So redpill me on uncle Joe, was he really as bad as I've heard?

>>1176620
Nah Napoleon was a chill but autistic dude. Austerlitz/10 would have wine with

>>1176620
>implying

Napoleon took over the Republic and showed the revolutionaries how a centralized nation-state should be run, if you're going have one at all. Of course Monarchists and Republicans alike worked against him, because he wasn't extremist enough for their tastes.

I give horoable mention to Thomas Midgley who fucked up while not even being a politician.

>>1176795
>Winning WW2
>Wasted 20th century
yeah he was a cunt, but without him we'd have lost to the krauts

>>1177139

>Thomas Midgley

Just looked him up, that guy's life is hilariously tragic.

File: 1449270376189.jpg (76KB, 440x587px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 440x587px

>>1176620
napoleon was the best thing that ever happened to france.
and if he didn't happear at that time france would probably end up like nazi germany or sovietic russia.

so clearly, you know very little about history and you probably have rotten teeth

>>1176389
After another hundred years or so of time has passed, it's likely that Lenin is going to be viewed much like Napoleon.

Lenin was definitely an impactful figure on human history as a whole and changed global politics forever. But the intentions, effects, and pros/cons will be debated throughout history. There'll definitely be camps of people who say that set the stage to bring Russia to the pinnacle of its power and gave new influence to working class people the world over. While others will say that all the blood he spilled and the dialectic of worldwide worker revolution was nothing but a failure at the cost of millions of lives.

there's two videos that are pretty insightful on the opposing views for both Lenin and Napoleon, and you can see how the two overlap as a mixed bag of consequences that undoubtedly changed humanity's course forever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N8hsXQapjY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aq_gRfmjgY

>>1176618
Not to mention the firebombing that took place in Japan where most structures were made of wood. Curtis Lemay doesn't get enough attention.

Stalin
>mass executions
>mass deportations
>gulags which were as bad as concentration camps, sometimes even worse
>allowing or conceiving ww2 tactics that required millions of deaths on his side
>not caring about his people in general
>most forced cult of personality of all time
>holodomor
>VERY ineffective labour laws and programs (just like all of the soviet dictators)
>cruelest regime of all the soviet dictators
>OCCUPATIONS
>basically a powermad psycho
>the entire soviet regime leaving a scar of alcoholism, corruption and vatnikism mostly because of this guy

>>1176389
Op got it.
While Stalin surely is responsible to more death, he lacked the downright nihilism and extreme cynicism of of Lenin. Stalin was a paranoid wreck, while Lenin was truly 100% in control of himself.

>>1179808
>alcoholism, corruption and vatnikism
Wow those things predate the soviet regime by several centuries.

>>1179846
vatniks would be far more tolerable if they bragged about Peter the Great instead of the USSR