how many microseconds do you get after the grill uses a safeword?
i mean, c'mon. it's 2015. the soundwaves take at least a few microseconds to propigate. and then your CIS rapist brain takes a few hundred to propigate the audio (that's why there are yellow lights before red lights).
Maybe women who get paid to do porn need 2 safewords. a yellow safeword, to give warning that a red safeword is coming.
And then we can install cameras that start taking pictures when the yellow safeword goes off.
>James Deen held me down and fucked me while I said no, stop, used my safeword. I just can't nod and smile when people bring him up anymore.
>while I said no, stop not even relevant. iirc she called him "daddy" and she has multiple interviews bragging about how dominant he is at home and how much she likes it.
>used my safeword now we're talking. absolute jerk move and totally unprofessional.
strange, Deen used to be pretty grounded. reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAK53pITlsA before he blew up as the biggest male adult performer since the turn of the milennium, i guess. dude's gotta be pretty a) delusional about his womanizing skills and b) jaded as fuck by now. guess when roleplay doesn't cut it anymore you have to act out the real deal?
>>7765325 yeah like obvi they had dom/sub shit or rape fantasy incorporated into their private sex life, which is why the safeword exists in the first place -- trust was clearly established and the asshole broke it
im confused why this thread was made to 'celebrate' that -- rape is not fucking okay
>>7765421 Yeah man, I actually liked Stoya, first discovered her through Marilyn Manson. I seriously hope she's doing okay, rape is fucking tough and the butthurt reddit threads accusing her of faking it don't help.
And just to add, of all the people in the world that would never lie about or exaggerate rape claims, 3rd wave feminists who use words like "Mansplainers" unironically are right at the top of that "Super duper honest" list right?
It wasn't just his scenes. One of the big porn websites (Brazzers I think) had a line of videos called Pornstar Punishment that were these pseudo-rape scenarios. Eventually they pulled all the videos, I think it was mainly due to some legal change regarding what classified as 'violent pornography' that they were scared of falling foul of. Deen did quite a few scenes for that line, and I think he took to twitter after they pulled the videos to say it was the right thing to do.
James Deen already is a criminal many times over for his brutal anal lunacy. Violent justice can't happen soon enough -- for him and for other career criminals that governments aren't likely to punish for these particular crimes ever, much less adequately.
Honestly I always hated his scenes because he gave off a combination of creepy and smug vibes that would ruin otherwise good scenes once the sex started happening - I'm used to creepy vibes from male pornstars, but it was like watching a porn video starring the smug frog meme with him
It's a social networking site so if you're not deliberately searching for stuff that is retarded or hotdogging a 15 year old's private tumblr you generally don't hit that stuff - same with Japanese Tumblr, which makes even otherkin tumblr look like the height of sanity.
But you do have to actively search for it - if you could easily trip over the dumb shit, people would be easily tripping over hyperinflationfuta porn all the time in casual searches of the site too.
(Well, ponys will always pop up, but I think that's just a fundamental law of the universe at this point)
>>7765743 Why don't you gtf off here and stick to tumblrr then. This is an image board not a "let's defend feminism so I can screenshot it and post it to my twitter, then all the girls will like me!" Website so either enjoy the thread for what it is or start your own.
>>7765667 There was this guy like that at a ballroom I used to dance at. Someone I had a few creepy encounters with. One of them included when I was alone and reading somewhere quiet. He came over and stood over me, kept looking with this smug, tyrannical smile on his face. Just hovering over like that for a minute or two. I pretended not to notice and kept reading until he went away.
Some of the other encounters are even more vague to explain. Which made it difficult to come out with or even mention to other people. On top of that, he was very popular with the girls there, especially the feminists. And a friend of mine started dating him, who really likes him a lot. Which just makes it harder to mention (the only times I did -- I never specified who and just made general statements). Since, to them, he would be the least likely candidate in this scenario.
Considering he practically only stars in mock gang rape scenes, this isn't so unbelievable. Shit, even if she's lying through her teeth, if it means I never have to see that rat fuck's face again, it's a win for me
>>7765841 was stating that to some people, for example the people he works with and people who identify his smug, creepy attitude, Stoya's claim is completely believable. However, to people who only identify him as the feminist/sjw he claims to be, it's impossible.
1) anyone who has ever fucked around with dom/sub knows there is a shitload of trust involved. it's not porn level shit, it's emotional.
2) you probably suck dick
3) if the dom/sub thing goes south, the last, and I mean the fucking last thing either person would do would be to accuse the other person of rape. that's literally retarded. you put on your big boy/girl pants and talk about it.
4) this is why we can't have nice things, and why women are effectively all whores.
Assuming it matters. She went on social media with rape claims. That is all anyone with an IQ above 45 needs to know. There is literally no value in that (aside from pitting her white knigts against his). In addition, if there was a legit claim, it's the complete opposite of what a lawyer would advise.
>>7765946 >it's the complete opposite of what a lawyer would advise. Most lawyer advise not pressing charges for rape by an intimate partner because there is no way to collect physical evidence. Lawyers would rather not taking on a case if they can't be assured of winning it.
>>7766185 >Still waiting for an answer to my question. > >I'm guessing silence means over 50. But that's OK. You're so cool :^) >She said he said, instagram twitter. Yes, it's retarded to call shit out on twitter, and she didn't even file a report, yadda yadda But as you said there's a lot of trust involved in bdsm shit and he violated that according to her, which is what I wanted to adress in your post
>>7766166 >do rape fantasy dom/sub shit, and if it doesn't go quite right, Except when you're not doing a fantasy, you tell him you're not playing and use the safeword but he ignores it. That isn't things "not going quite right" that is straight up rape(aka non-consensual sex)
>>7765325 I don't know much about Deen but there's been always some rather divisive opinions about him, ranging from his porn acting to his opinions. >>7765421 >im confused why this thread was made to 'celebrate' that Because this is 4chan. Basically an edgy way of saying "hey, this happened." Of course, more proof is needed though. >>7765626 She has a lot of scenes with him and a significant portion of his audience, IIRC, greatly enjoys them being a couple o whatever. Undeniable that he gets more hurt because of the accusation. Whether it's deserved, we'll see. >>7766189 His post sounds newfaggy in a way, but that's par for the course on /gif/. And that's not what white knight means, unless it's gotten dilluted now, like SJW.
I don't really like James Dean scenes at all. His work doesn't look fun. I don't think most professional porn conveys fun that well, but his ESPECIALLY doesn't to me for some reason. I'm kind of surprised by the lack of circlejerk hate NOT going on towards him in this thread.
Anyway, it is just Stoya saying this, right? No other girls are backing her up with stuff like, "Yeah, he went too far with me too?"
Maybe give a young professional guy the benefit of the doubt here?
>>7764940 It's similar to how white prostitutes start supporting the swedish model after they lose their youth. Claiming that every client they ever had raped them, and buying sex is violence against women.
As soon as the money dries up they gotta put food in their mouths and herroin in their viens some other way
>>7766243 And that's why we use red/red-light as a standardized backup safeword. And why dominants need to be super mindful and check in frequently. You never know when aftercare will need to start ahead of schedule.
>>7766208 this is important -- it's not like 'whoops we got a little too rough, she didn't like it and cried rape' -- all of that is built into the activity WITH THE SAFEWORD
to everyone saying she's making shit up, I don't think that's the case. the argument that no one can prove either way is correct because yes, it's just he said/she said -- but that means there's no fucking way calling him out on social media would fuck with his career at all because there's no legal recourse because she can't prove shit who the fuck in the porn industry wouldn't give work to someone because they've been accused of rape? sexual violence is endemic in that industry -- so this couldn't be some contrived attempt to get back at an ex by making shit up there literally is next to nothing to be gained in this instance by defaming james deen -- if you think it's for career advancement, it literally makes zero sense to knock a male porn star down to advance yourself if your female -- you're not competing for roles and success isn't zero sum between them. if you think it's for petty relationship revenge, it doesn't make sense that stoya as a self-proclaimed feminist would do that via rape accusation if she, as many feminists do, believes that women are almost never taken seriously when forwarding rape accusations without evidence.
i can't speak for her motivations for making the allegations the way she did, but there's really no reason for her to fabricate all of it
>>7766299 It's a very likely scenario, so Im inclined to believe that it may have happened. not sure how that should effect james dean though. Like if it happened he prob should have sought forgiveness and helped her out afterwards.
why? there's not going to be any preponderance of evidence that proves he did it -- the usual evidence in rape trials assumes that consent for sex wasn't given in the first place (eg semen, physical evidence of rape) but that doesn't apply when consent was given, then revoked after sex started
so there's no way evidence will be laid out on a table that proves he raped her, but at the same time it doesn't make sense that stoya just made everything up
>>7766291 >it doesn't make sense that stoya as a self-proclaimed feminist would do that via rape accusation if she, as many feminists do, believes that women are almost never taken seriously when forwarding rape accusations without evidence.
.....are you for real?
Women are irrational lunatics. By definition. Feminists are that squared. SJW type 3rd wave fanatics are feminists cubed. They can alter and bend reality, facts and logic in their minds in a way that makes comic book characters look like nothing.
>>7766320 Suppose for the sake of the argument that I've sucked every human dick that it's legal for me to suck -- I'm the goddamned president of blowjob island. Sex without consent would still be rape, wouldn't it? So your argument is "if rape happens in the context of S&M, you shouldn't make a big deal out of it, just have a chat."
You haven't sucked my dick yet because I'm loyal and even if not I wouldn't mess around with a coal burner. But, in the bizzaro world where you did, your argument is still invalid because you are still just making assumptions with no... wait for it...
>>7766353 Lawyerfag here, while I appreciate the use of big words, unless she's suing him for tort battery / Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress / etc. the preponderance standard doesn't apply to the ultimate question of guilt or innocence. That question is decided by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
>>7766405 > Sex without consent would still be rape, wouldn't it? > president of blowjob island
Consent is implied.
> if rape happens in the context of S&M
If 'S&M' is initiated, consent is given. From my perspective, 'S&M' is the equivalent of "once this gets started -- anything goes tonight aside from loss of limbs and murder". It's like you sign on for the special forces and then start having a tantrum. Know what they do? They shoot you. Really. Actions have consequences.
well, i understand your perspective, and I hope Stoya is OK, but there has been a statistically significant number of instances of rape claims which have been proven false in both a court of law and then later denide by the plaintiff. It happens about once a day (courtfag here)
>>7766444 >From my perspective, 'S&M' is the equivalent of "once this gets started -- anything goes tonight aside from loss of limbs and murder". That's because you're a dumbass that doesn't have a clue of how BDSM works.
>>7766444 >If 'S&M' is initiated, consent is given. From my perspective, 'S&M' is the equivalent of "once this gets started -- anything goes tonight aside from loss of limbs and murder".
that's why safe words exist -- s&M shit isn't 'anything goes,' there are boundaries that have been outlined, the bare minimum of which in this case appears to have been a safe word, which she said, and he ignored -- that's rape
consent is never implied -- but even if you think it can be, in this case the revoking of consent was explicit which means there's no excuse
>>7766488 >Yes, the intricacies of your particular brand of degeneracy are such a mystery. >i got called out >b-better call him a degenerate Yeah mate you're a dumbass. Never take the name off. >>7766490 The law states otherwise, so it doesn't matter.
>4chan defending a self-proclaimed SWJ twitter-feminist regardless of who's right. >A woman would never lie about rape right? You faggots are all retarded. I'm ashamed of fapping to the same gifs as you. ASHAMED
if he did rape her and she was confident she would win she would of gone to court but since she went to social media it means she wasn't raped and just wants to get the public on her side saying no halfway through is rape neither is agreeing to rough sex
>>7766516 >it's never been upheld. What? >you cunts haven't figured out time travel yet, and by then we'll have sexbots. No, really. You're so far up your own ass with this culture war bullshit that you can't see what's being argued, only what you think it is. >>7766518 That's true, I only thought of it after hitting submit. >>7766538 The social media stuff is very stupid, yes. Probably indicates she has no proof. It could still have happened, of course, but she's opening herself (heh) for a slander lawsuit or some shit
Reality is this: it's possible that doing what he allegedly did is immoral. It may even fulfill the conditions that you'd need to fulfill to be legally called a rapist. But nobody that isn't a braindamaged retard should refer to this as rape.
Rape is what happens to lots and lots of young white men in prison. It's what the Red Army did to German, Polish, etc women after WWII. It's what happens to infants in South Africa.
This is just two degenerates playing some game and one of them doesn't play by the rules. It may be immoral and maybe it should even be punished by the law. But I cannot, in good conscience, call that "rape". That's just disgusting.
Also: SJWs are subhumans in a way that cannot be described. They're basically fair game to me.
>>7766538 >and she was confident she would win she would of gone to court Why would anybody be confident about winning a rape case in court? In he-said/she-said cases the courts always side with the man who claims to be feminist.
BTW, it's "would have" or "would've" not "would of" you illiterate methhead.
>>7766508 > Then he is a rapist. And nobody is talking about jail > he is a rapist > nobody is talking about jail
Up until I was about... 20 years old, I considered rape something that was followed by murder half the time. A strange man kidnaps a random girl, beats her and has her way with her perhaps for one night or many, then kills her and disposes of the body. Fairly sure that was the main definition of rape, but whatever, when everything is rape -- nothing will be.
Now Stoya and Mr Thundercock were 'play-raping', she said the magic word, he didn't stop, she was peeved about that but probably isn't 'damaged'. They probably slept in the same bed that night. That's not rape, that's a couple's disagreement.
>>7766459 > be american soldier in syria > hostility is never implied > get shot and die
> be american beta S&M kek > consent is never implied > never get laid
>>7766580 Rape is non-consensual sexual contact, that's it. I agree that some are worse than others, but still. >Also: SJWs are subhumans in a way that cannot be described. They're basically fair game to me. What do you mean by this? >>7766592 I don't see how's that relevant? And maybe she has tweeted about it. Like the other anon said, male rape doesn't get reported as often.
>>7766604 Do you have a source? In any case I don't see why it matters to whether she got raped or not. >>7766609 >Bullshit. It's consensual unless it isn't. Anything else is garbage. Where did I say otherwise? Do you understand what consent means? >You don't want sex, you make it known. As above.
>>7766609 That literally IS how it works with robbery, too.
If a robber walks into your house you don't have to actively tell them to leave for it to be robbery, for reasons you literally explained and are accurate. If you try to fight back, they might kill you. A stranger walking into your house uninvited is legitimately viable to be charged with breaking and entering.
That's also why it's robbery if you're asleep.
Do you have to tell someone not to murder you for them to not legally be able to?
>>7766630 >you seem upset about something you have zero evidence about. What would that be? I didn't mention Stoya at all, or supported her side. The insane person that reads things that aren't there is you mate. >>7766633 Sounds unethical to me but whatever.
only because standard 3rd wave femacunt bullshit about shilling endlessly. you have zero evidence. bryan denied the claim. he's a pretty stand up dude, jess seems like she lost her shit. sans evidence (you have none) a rational person who doesn't smoke donkey dick (you) would obviously be highly skeptical of her claims (but if she's on H I'm so gonna be ready for her strung out phase).
>>7766670 Their social media, I guess. >>7766673 His point is that your post is nonsensical (his kinda is too but w/e). Why would she be googling that? She alledgelly gets raped, so she should google it to see that men alledgelly have it worse so she shouldn't complain or something?
>>7766689 >only because standard 3rd wave femacunt bullshit about shilling endlessly. So you're admitting to being delusional? >you have zero evidence. About what, you idiot? Did I mention Deen was guilty? I was talking about other shit, like the definition of rape and the under-reporting of male rape and you replied to me with your bullshit.
>>7766705 You're missing the point by a mile. >she alledged she was raped on social media. the person she accused alleged it was not true. Yes? I even said as much ITT. Do you know what alledged means? >you have no data, your are just spewing. Data about what?
Mate you are insane. >>7766711 That may be true, but that's not the point. >>7766713 Money, and yes she probably doesn't have evidence.
So I guess we can finish up the night by agreeing that
1) Jess has no evidence of being raped 2) Bryan is an avid social media guy, gets paid to fuck women in a variety of weird situations, and has been a professional fucker for years with no verifiable complaints. 3) Porn work has been demonstrated to cause mental health issues with women, statistacally more significantly than with men. 4) A porn worker who is involved in rape fantasy claims another porn worker (who was her boyfriend) who is an expert in rape fantasy porn didn't respond to a "code word" quickly enough (no data on the latency, no evidence).
>>7766746 She's co-owner, she could probably make a couple calls and get the guy gone. Why would someone be in business with people who would trust a rapist? No one.
>she knows police don't believe women about intimate partner rape. Biggest line of bull I've heard in awhile. First of if of that fucking important, you try anyway. Secondly, you don't need to give a shit what police thinks, it's the law. Plenty of couples go to court over abuse. Stop talking out your ass.
>we now have to make sure 100% that the woman we're about to fuck is ok with it >we now have to resort to safe words and constant asking of consent and 'checking in' to make sure the woman we're fucking is still ok with it >the minute she doesn't like it you have to stop immediately because then it turns into rape >women can now change their minds midway through fucking to make it rape
>>7766744 >1) Jess has no evidence of being raped Probably not. >2) Bryan is an avid social media guy, gets paid to fuck women in a variety of weird situations, and has been a professional fucker for years with no verifiable complaints. Depends on what you mean by verifiable complaints. Other female pornstars have talked about him negatively, it seems. But I don't actually know. >3) Porn work has been demonstrated to cause mental health issues with women, statistacally more significantly than with men. Do you have a source? Also, "caused". They might have had them first which is what drove them to porn, but whatever. >4) A porn worker who is involved in rape fantasy claims another porn worker (who was her boyfriend) who is an expert in rape fantasy porn didn't respond to a "code word" quickly enough (no data on the latency, no evidence). This seems true, though she made it sound like he didn't respond to the safe word till he was finished.
Now, lemme ask you: what's that Bryan/Jesse shit? Did I miss a dank meme somewhere? >>7766740 Most people knowledgeable would say that yes, it is. Unless the person is dead, then it depends. Sounds gross, but yeah.
>>7766765 Law defines it rather clearly. People have given adequate descriptions ITT too. >>7766776 >>we now have to make sure 100% that the woman we're about to fuck is ok with it I don't see how that's a problem. And yes, nonverbal consent counts. >>we now have to resort to safe words and constant asking of consent and 'checking in' to make sure the woman we're fucking is still ok with it You don't seem to be aware of what safe word means in this context, anon. >>the minute she doesn't like it you have to stop immediately because then it turns into rape Nothing wrong with this.
>From 2004-2010 Deen dated fellow porn star Joanna Angel. In an interview with the Huffington Post from July 2013, porn actress Stoya stated that she was dating James Deen.
Deen is Jewish and identifies with Judaism as "a culture more than anything else". During an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, he joked: "The Jews know we're better than everyone else. That's all that matters... (Laughs) It's true. We're the Chosen People. (Laughs) It's a fact." >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Deen fucking kill this cunt
>>7766711 >If I were a betting man I'd bet that the dude claiming 10-1 is also the dude claiming that >>Women are irrational lunatics. By definition. You would make a terrible betting man m8, /r9k/ and /pol/ exist in this site >>7766808 You're cingeworthy af my man
U avin a giggle m8? In a veeeeeery general sense, US laws define rape as nonconsentual penetration. We all know that rape extends FAR beyond that, and that people are convicted for very different conduct.
Let's not even get in to the fuckery that occurs depending on what state you're in (from SJW New York to Slut Shaming Alabama)
We're not talking about this snowskinned whore. If what she alleges is true, you could go ahead and say he is a rapist.
But it disgusts me that you can jew your way into calling someone that. I mean, she suffered injustice, but it's SO minor compared to what just about all of rape victims suffer. It's petty. It's like comparing a slap to somebody getting beaten into a coma and calling both assault and battery. (technically true)
>>7766813 The definition ITT, used three times by what it seems to be different people, is "nonconsensual sexual contact" Is that wrong? >>7766825 Yes Go read some moral philosophy /lit/ should have some recommendations >>7766852 That IS bullshit, of course, but that's not what you complained about Whatever, I guess
>>7766862 >But it disgusts me that you can jew your way into calling someone that. This isn't hat the chain of comments was talking about either , but anyways > I mean, she suffered injustice, but it's SO minor compared to what just about all of rape victims suffer. One could argue it was similar or worse because of the relationship they had Kinda depends on how was the sex initiated too
you know... being a police officer is probably one of the most difficult and stressful job out there.
yeah of course you are going to have a few bad apples, but don't talk shit to the blue.
but whores are kinda the same. the people are freaking out about cops fucking people up, so they have to wear chest cameras now. maybe the next step is to have cameras on hookers so we can have video on who got raped and who didn't.
I wonder how that would affect rape statistics? anyone have a guess?
>>7766884 >I'm pretty sure they were in a relationship. They were, which is why this incident is an egregious violation of trust (either for the one who was raped or the one who was falsely accused months after the fact)
>>7764906 >>James Deen held me down and fucked me while I said no, stop, used my safeword. I just can't nod and smile when people bring him up anymore So did this happen recently or in the past? Was it in private or on set? If the bitch ain't being specific she's probably just attention-seeking and lying.
>>7766929 >they have statistically gone down tremendously wherever it's been documented. Where have body cameras been documented for sex workers? Or are you talking about murder rates in general and are just too illiterate to follow the conversation.
>>7765325 >she called him "daddy" and she has multiple interviews bragging about how dominant he is at home and how much she likes it. And Christy Mack said she loved how dominant War Machine was. A relationship can blind you to how harmful a person is
>>7766971 >As always, real victims should go to the proper authorities. Not mouth off on Twitter to get more followers. >I make sure my victims can't touch me in court, and I don't want them talking about my crimes either.
>>7766740 Women need to be raped. It is the only language they understand. Women enjoy rape. Don't let them tell you otherwise, because they are notorious liars and don't know their own minds. Women want to be held down and fucked hard. They want to be made to cry and scream. Women have a biological imperative to be raped. Did you know that women who are raped are twice as likely to conceive as women who have unprotected consensual sex? It is a fact. Women who are raped often have orgasms as well - some women have never had an orgasm in their lives save for a rape. The desire to be sexually dominated is deeply programed into the woman. This is a fact of evolution that cannot be denied without women becoming unbalanced. Feminism is really just an outward manifestation of an internal problem with modern women. These 'feminists' desperately want to be put in their place. That's why they act out so much and are so belligerent. Whether they know it or not, subconsciously they want to piss men off and get men to make them submit. They want to be slapped in the face, told to shut the fuck up, and then raped until they can't stand up. This is what women really want. I say we give it to them.
>>7766617 how come? I find it really funny how you make no apologies for accepting the safe word as being "magic". It's completely fucking insane, as in if I was a kinky fuck, rape play could only ever be a femdom situation because I'm entrusting the rest of my life out of prison to some broad every single time I would do it. Choking, ball busting, whatever, that's nothing when a few keystrokes the day later I can get arrested because of some bullshit word game amidst vanilla sex and not even an awkward moment afterwards. How am I supposed to know I'm a rapist? the lack of pillow talk?
>>7766488 >> we just pretend to rape but if I say the magic word and he doesn't stop, I call the police and he goes to jail! >Really? You don't see the problem? This reminds me of 2nd grade for some reason...
Let's make this very simple for a simple man like you: Boxing. Two guys pretend to fight, but when the magic bell rings and the other guy doesn't stop, he goes to jail for assault and battery.
And no, I don't see a problem with that. Neither should anyone with half a brain.
People can *agree* to suspend normal rules (against rape, against violence) within a safe context. And that doesn't mean a free pass to do whatever and break the safety of the context. Outside of BDSM roleplay, rape is still rape. Outside of sports, hitting someone in the face is still assault. The bell ends the sport, the safe word ends the roleplay. This is how the world works.
literally incorrect. It's up to the ref. Happens all the time (because it's a fight, and punches are often thrown to the last possible second), only clearly obvious cases of illegal behavior are dealt with. Mostly the 2 men acknowledge that it's a fight and you're gonna have that now and then.
ironically, it's even less of a thing in womens boxing or MMA.
Rape fantasy is so popular with women because they can trick men into actually raping them, therefore giving the women a sliver of oppertunity to retract consent, making the man a rapist, which in the USA, has an extremely severe impact.
this gives the vaginal life-support their only glipse of having any actual power in western society.
everyone shut the fuck up now and go back to reddit.
>>7767506 this is fucking stupid, swinging after the bell is "unsportsmanlike" behavior, a fault but certainly not assault. Why? BECAUSE IT'S A FUCKING BOXING MATCH, the men showed up expecting to punch and get punched.
The equivalent of what you're referring to is if one of the fighters takes off the gloves and goes for the nuts, but that's clear indication of criminal intent, that's completely different.
James Deen is the manlet jew that literally said jews were superior and got all pissy when no white women would fuck his black male stars for his company without charging a huge $ amount. He then lashed out and accused the women of being racist.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.