ITT: Shitty logo redesigns from last year and this year

>>274558
Flipfriend, where you at?

File: cbbc_logo[1].png (24KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 1000x1000px

>>274560
>implying
This is not /int/.


here's another one

File: Capture.png (163KB, 1199x515px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1199x515px

There aren't any *good* redesign threads, so here's one from this year that I like.

File: 1464937850193.jpg (19KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x400px

>>274558
>>274560
>PLDC

>>275523
Saw this earlier, who the fuck got paid for this.

File: expensive but shitty design.jpg (9KB, 667x500px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 667x500px

Another one of Pentagram's brandings which could have easily passed as mediocre student work, in other circumstances. I sometimes wonder what's it like to cash in mad $$$ for designs like this one.
>B-b-b-ut it's made by Michael Bierut, you idiot. He's a legend, who are you to judge him? What accomplishments do you have? You're nobody. Stay salty.
In all seriousness, though, I'm really curious how much did they ask for rolling back to their 1979 logo. I bet they worked for months on this one.

File: mia_logo.png (43KB, 1000x560px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1000x560px

>>276590
You can call me a hater all you want, but here's another example.

>>275596
That's actually pretty good.

It's a modern redesign, but it still feels like some old ass ice cream shit. Like nostalgia feels, if you get what I mean.