Thread replies: 23
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: maxresdefault.jpg (252KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
252KB, 1280x720px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_4ZhrGfA4Y
What did they mean by this?
>>
>>
Why on the AMD side is so much of the load being put onto the CPU?
>>
>>62473442
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_C%2B%2B_Compiler#Criticism
>>
>>62474165
ah so AMD sucks, I see
>>
File: 1502057271223.jpg (18KB, 267x297px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 267x297px
>>62474293
>>
>>62473442
amd's driver overhead
>>
>>62473402
fucking nvidia didnt render that bald dude...
>>
>>62474412
also, look how many fucking cars the AMD rendered...
jesus fuck, this benchmark is shit
>>
>>62473402
>800mhz vs 4001 mhz
>same performance
what
>>
>>62474503
>What is HBM2 for $400, Alex.
>>
Why does the grass look like a Simpsons map from CS?
>>
>>62474422
It's how nvidia benchmarks work- the drivers turn down the settings.
>>
>>62475235
Alex what
>>
>>62475312
pajeet please leave
>>
>>62475262
Because the guy has a retarded postprocessing shader mod installed. GTA 5 looks just fine without it.
>>
>Trusting literally-who youtubers
The vermin of tech journalism who would kill their own mother to get sent free shit by companies.
>>
>>62474165
it's the same CPU on both sides though.
>>
File: doitfgt.jpg (85KB, 835x703px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 835x703px
>>62473402
Yes, this pile of shit 2011 console port with garbage mods installed is truly the best way to judge the performance of modern GPUs.
>>
>>62473402
>60fps
>17.4ms
pick one
>>
>>62477505
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS DETECTED
>>
>>62474165
Nvidia do this for years, but lol gayming
>>
where's the "uarch improvements disabled" and "17.320 branch drivers" shill? I bet he's going to eventually post here
Thread posts: 23
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3