>Made by Jon von Tetzchner and his team in Norway. >H

>proprietary freeware
Also, it's incredibly stupid that you would be swayed by the political opinion of a software developer on irrelevant topics, regardless of what opinion that is

Also, sage

File: Le-Happy-Merchant-Question-Mark.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>62447761
good sliding there, Chaim

>>62447717
It's the least shit browser I guess.

>>62447717

>not even Mozzarella ever said anything negative about Google because they're afraid to lose that search money
Hardly surprising. Google keeps them alive at this point.

>>62447817
Right, because you're really sticking it to the man agreeing to all those EULA agreements! Way to show Them!

Keep up the good work, /b/ro!

>>62447887
[citation needed]

>>62447817
You're just as bad as the people who think Apple lecturing you on why you should accept gay marriage isn't an abnormal thing to do for a tech company. Virtue signaling is still virtue signaling, you prick, and you should ignore it at all costs, or else you encourage that behavior. There are valid topics for software project to opine on and invalid topics. The social agenda of Google is one of the latter.

>>62447927
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/041315/how-mozilla-firefox-and-google-chrome-make-money.asp

97%

>>62448046
That article literally proves nothing. If anything, it proves the inverse.

just use waterfox

>>62448593
Thanks for bumping this thread, asshole

>>62447717
I'm not white and I don't use Vivaldi(who's a pleb af composer btw)

>>62448618
don't be rude pls

>>62448640
It is time to come home.

>>62448640
i've 4 seasons for you to use vivaldi tho