>ask legitimate question on stackexchange
>specifically about OpenCL in Intel CPU/GPU and Cycles renderer
>get shitpost and uninformed opinion worse than /g/
>>62357554
mainstream sites like stackexchange are highly controlled to the point where they follow the cia brainwashing program to a T.
if you try and get useful information there, you will be subverted. I've seen moderators encourage people NOT to get into motherboard manufacturing because it was "not possible"
>OpenCL
>Not using superior CUDA with NVIDIA GPUs
>>62357554
try stackoverflow next time
>>62357574
I didnt know that something can be so cluserfucked.
>>62357587
yes goy,while getting shitpost like this on stackexchange it turned out you can force CPU+GPU OpenCL in cycles and the performance benefits are equivalent to 1/3 faster than CPU only.
GPU usage caps at 40% so I have to look into it.
>>62357587
yeah this is exactly how stackexchange would respond.
poison your attempt at gaining knowledge in the field and advertise their proprietary shit in its place.
You're never going to find what you are looking for, until you get into mailing lists with pretty active developers
And even then you might get stackexchange tier discussion