Are those chink turntables worth anything? I want to buy my first

Probably the worst thing it will scratch your disc and make it sound worse

>>62330553
That's what I was afraid of. Can you reccomend some alternative?

>>62330573
>>>62330553 (You)
>That's what I was afraid of. Can you reccomend some alternative?
Nope

>2017
>having physical music collections
>falling for the vinyl revival hipster meme (the quality won't beat a compact disc ripped to FLAC or other lossless file)
>not buying cheap CDs used, ripping them to lossless files and throwing them in the trash after

no kill yourself fucking subhuman cuck

File: Michael_Jackson-Black_or_White_Loudness.png (36KB, 822x1680px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 822x1680px

>>62331154
There is a reason why vinyls can in theory sound better than CDs, but it's something horrible.
You see, retarded studios are since the mid 80's pushing the media to make the audio louder and louder and louder, obliterating the actual audio fidelity in the process as they crush the details horribly with it.
And Vinyls are less prone to data loss because they don't have hard limits as with CDs.
But there are also several,several cases where the vinyl audio source IS a crushed CD and nothing can be done.

>>62330535
No, decent turntables start at 200$+

>>62330535
No.

Just look out for mid-70's to mid-90's turntables, even the cheaper ones of that time where better than okay, specially compared to the ones we have now.