why would a consumer cpu need remote management why cant the

Because NSA need you to have it as well

>>62255317
so the government can spy on you silly

>>62255317
The CPU needs to be paired with a chipset with it enabled.

Most/many consumer boards don't have it enabled.

>>62257105
You need the chipset for the security features that cost money.
You don't need the chipset for the spying features which the NSA does for free.

The only reason to have these hardware level embedded spyware is so that intelligence agencies can spy on you.

It was just found out recently that Intel had an undocumented method of disabling the spyware for their government customers.

Spyware for you, but not for them.

If the government wanted it disabled on their systems, what the hell does that tell you about it being enabled on your system?

>>62257156
The CPU itself cannot do anything without the chipset because it is the chipset that is supplying access.
The AMT in the CPU itself just runs the code that it is told by the chipset.

>>62255317
Why can't they just make an open source baseband for your phone?

>>62255317
>>62257105

*rubs hands*

>>62257353
So all this X200 hype is a meme?

stop asking so many questions
we just released a brand new line of chipsets
dont you want to fight with amd fans?

>>62255317
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrksBdWcZgQ