why are there no 4k 144Hz monitors? tech isn't there yet, or no demand, or some other reason?
>>62244342
who needs 4k
1440p is enough
>>62244342
Production cost and thus retail price would be so high no one would buy it.
Also there is no GPU that comes close to rendering 144fps on 4k for newer games.
Wait a few years and they'll start coming.
>>62244342
about the best you'll find is zisworks' tcon4k120 + a suitable panel, which is sold as "most assembly required"
Acer and Asus had announced such monitors in January but delayed them until 2018.
>>62244366
There's 8k tv's and 4k's been around for half a decade. It's not expensive to produce, the industry is just trying to milk consumers dry with little innovation. There's probably price-fixing going on too.
>>62244450
Just because 8k is available doesn't mean it's super easy for people to get 4k. Lots of people still keep/buy 1080p monitors and 4k 144hz is not feasible at the moment.
Price fixing is a given though, of course. Look at RAM now and SSDs/HDDs over the last 10+ years and if it's not "floods" (read NSA back orders) it's collusion.
>>62244342
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rG_a7Qs2odc
There is, no consumer stuff yet
The only people who want 144Hz are people playing vidya. Most modern games run like shit at max 4k 60Hz with high end GPUs so there is no market for it yet.
I am sure the Tech is there if they really wanted to dump it but you always keep shit on the back burner to keep a constant supply of more powerful tech. Like how smarts phones are always kept three generations behind before shipping. I may seem sucky but it is how most companies can continue to innovate without going under.
>>62244342
Can't utilize it with consumer hardware yet, so sales will be low and prices to high.
Also both 4K and 144hz are an utter meme but that won't stop people (including you) from falling for it.
>inb4 retarded anecdotal "evidence'' that one or the other actually improved someones life.
>>62244468
>doesn't mean it's super easy for people to get 4k
have you heard of amazon.com ?
>>62244733
poorfag detected
>>62244342
Because you also need a pc that can run games in 144fps at 4k resolution. Not that many people have such beast PCs
>>62244355
4k is more standard than 1440
>>62244366
High refresh rate isn't just for games. General usage is far better at >60Hz