Why do I have to use deprecated filesystem if I want compatibility between android and windows?
>>62212338
windows works with it and Android is linux
Android should be able to read NTFS, otherwise install Gentoo and use a proper FS like ext4 or f2fs
Because windows IS deprecated, NTFS, the so-called "new" filesystem is 15+ years old, and they won't give default support to ext4 or pretty much most filesystems, because NIHS and incompetence.
E X F A T
>>62212403
Android don't support it.
My 3 year old Asus Zenfone 5 on Android 5.0 is using EXFAT, which is a modern filesystem.
Your phone is shit.
>>62212403
YOU'RE MOM IS EXFAT
>>62212396
zfs is 15 years old as well and it's the top fs
>>62212338
APFS guy's thats all im sayin
>>62212442
Android allegedly supports it since KitKat, but as always you will only get it if your manufacturer feels like enabling it.
>>62212600
YOUR MOM IS VFAT
>>62212396
>using "it's old" as an argument in anything technology related
t. brainlet
Because fat32 is the only sane format for external hard drive.
>>62212338
Because is easy to implement, is documented everywhere, they are lots of open source implementations, and "proper" filesystems have permission issues sometimes.
>>62212396
>new filesystem
I dont remember any document of microsoft refering NTFS as New File System.
Anyways, you don't want bleeding edge filesystems, lad.
>>62212804
zfs is a meme and needs to die
>>62212338
u need to use that shit on a GPT disk in UEFI too :/
>>62213112
>"NTFS"
>"New Technology File System"
>>62213213
>he believes that NT stands for New Technology
VMS + 1 = WNT
>>62213237
>https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc230448.aspx
>New Technology File System (NTFS): The native file system of Windows 2000 operating system, Windows XP operating system, Windows Vista operating system, Windows 7 operating system, and Windows 8 operating system. Within this document, this term is occasionally used to refer to the operating system subsystem that implements NTFS support. For more information, see [MSFT-NTFS].
You were only pretending to be retarded,
>>62213272
>believing official microsoft documents
>who is dave cutler?
>>62213357
What are you going on about? I'm talking about what the name, specifically what the acronym NTFS stands for. I linked you official MS documentation, it clearly states that that is indeed its name.
>>62213374
Well, considering that I'm talking with the retard that believes that filesystems should be bleeding edge, I thiunk this discussion is doomed.
>>62212338
incompetent devs afraid of changes
Microsoft should use APFS superior fs
>>62214009
>i know jack shit about filesystems