Its over >End of The Pirate Bay? How Apple could be about

tfw yiffy will be release date + 17 days from now on

>>62202630
So going to cinema isn't worth it anymore? After 17 days it will be on tpb

File: DEAD_.webm (3MB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x1280px

That's not going to stop piracy, fag.

In fact this will just increase piracy as people get access to video before it's out on blu-ray discs lmao.

btw anyone interested in encoding video:
V: 10-bit HEVC, faster preset, 22 CRF
A: 128 vbr Opus

Do that for 1080p, 720p, or even 4K. Video will come out with the absolute best balance of quality and file size.

Encoder GUI: https://github.com/stax76/staxrip/releases

latest 10-bit x265 encoder: https://builds.x265.eu

>>62202630
>38 eurobucks for ONE movie
wow im shaking im my boots

>>62202630
I really don't get how this would stop piracy

desu MoviePass $10 monthly subscription is much more likely to kill movie piracy

>>62202694
Only a fraud would suggest to use hevc for sub-4k.

>>62202630
>£38
You know I'm not positive, but I think that's more than the £0 I pay for piracy

>apple will destroy piracy
Yeah. And also Trump will be impeached and Obama will decree martial law.
Meh.

>>62202711
Test out the latest x265 encoder, it's at minimum 50% more efficient than the x264 one.

>inb4 "muh hw decoder"
We've had those on $100 android trash chinkphones with snapdragon 6XXs for a while now.

>>62202711
Are you arguing against getting the same quality for half the disk space?

Nice piracy future will look bright if it can be realeased after 17 days

>>62202699
You do understand that intel and amd arent on suicide watch right? That OP is alwahs a baiting faggot right? Read the sidebar or send me a PM if youre still confused

>>62202630
WELP, YOU SAW IT HERE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, APPLE SINGLEHANDEDLY STOPPED PIRACY, SOMETHING NO OTHER ENTITY HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO SO FAR.

>/capsarcasm

>>62202727
>Bernie can still win!

>>62202678
After a day is on tpb and with subtitles

>>62202630
>https://archive.fo/kNRFG
>YASSO
>Yet Another Streaming Server Online.

Yes because more streaming services have always worked in the past.

>>62202630
So I'll be pirating films just after 17 days? Nice

>>62202630
The people who write this bullshit have no clue what torrenting is about

I don't want to watch Marvels latest pile of bullshit. I want to watch things that I WANT to watch. On my own terms, in the way I want to watch it. Anything with DRM isn't going to allow for this.

there hasn't been a movie worth watching in a theater in 5 years

>£38 for a fucking movie

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHsageinallfields

>>62202694
How do I do this on handbrake?

>>62202734
>>>62202711
>Test out the latest x265 encoder, it's at minimum 50% more efficient than the x264 one.
>>inb4 "muh hw decoder"
>We've had those on $100 android trash chinkphones with snapdragon 6XXs for a while now.
Who cares about file size? 40gb bluray? Here in eastern europe it is not a problem. But I don't want to "upgrade" my still good 4670k with 780 to just get hardware decoding of some shitty codec which will become obsolete in a few years anyway.

It's a shame to see even Steve Jobs couldn't knock sense into the movie industry. They just don't get it, do they?

Firstly, that's ludicrously expensive. Quarter the price. Needs to be an impulse buy.

Secondly, the release needs to be simultaneous with the theatrical release, and worldwide. Any gap in that creates demand for pirated copies.

The Darknet And The Future Of Content Distribution (Biddle,
England,
Pienado,
Willman) <http://msl1.mit.edu/ESD10/docs/darknet5.pdf> came out like a decade ago and change.

All they're doing is creating a great source for dewatermarking and ripping.

>>62202630
>dont own the film, still pay money for lifetime rent nuless I lose my data, and they don't have it anymore

no thnx

>>62202907
You don't, download staxrip I put in the link. Then all you have to do is download a recent x265 encoder and replace the stock one inside the staxrip directory.

>>62202843
cheaper than blu ray

>>62202770
It was blatant sarcasm you retarded /pol/io

>>62202752
Also I believe them when they claim that macs rule
I also believe them that aplle products werks
I guess we have to submit to our overlords who killed pirate bay.

>>62202917
Most people use phones and prefer seeding a 1GB x265 720p rip vs a 4GB x264 1080p rip.

Also hardware decoding is only needed for phones due to high battery drain associated with software decoding. You don't have to worry about that.

x265 is going to be relevant for at least another decade.

>>62202630
Thanks apple now we can get rips 17 days after movies come out. The Korean rips suck.

>>62202630
>38
I could see the movie for that

>>62202630
How much real money are 38 poundings?

>>62202630
>stream a movie for £38
But movie ticket is cheaper

>>62202630
So basically... 17 days after a film's theatrical debut, I'll be able to pirate said film in good, non-camshit quality.

Thank you Apple!

Fuck movie theaters. I'm glad Netflix is keeping people away from them. They should continue suffering until the day studios force them to compete on equal footing with streaming services, meaning same-day movie releases with competitive pricing.

>>62202931
But not BD quality, and no BD features. And what about old film? Not everyone watches the newest Hollywood spew

File: 1504269844915.png (28KB, 1027x731px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1027x731px

>>62202630
Ok Mr autismo the magical kid

>£38

and i though grey goose was expensive, apple can fuck off.

How much do you pay guys to theaters and think they are expensive?

>>62203062
>a cheaper alternative doesn't have features the original has
Shocking, I know.

>>62202962
>Also hardware decoding is only needed for phones due to high battery drain associated with software decoding. You don't have to worry about that.
Same thing for laptops, and desktops running 1440p or 4k. Stop forcing people to upgrade hardware while bandwidth is cheap as fuck.

good idea but the price is stupid considering no overhead from owning a physical location.

>>62202630
why would anyone watch a movie or show or whatever? don't you have anything better to do?

File: No-Netflix.jpg (9KB, 228x225px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 228x225px

>>62203048
>terrible selection
>poor bitrate
>some content not even available above SD quality even with BDs out
>DRM
>at the forefront of HTML DRM, which aims to restrict the web for all
>sells user data to third parties as per their privacy policy
>can't play above 720p in browsers other then Edge
>requires hardware DRM to even play 4K content
>consumers buying new hardware are paying for DRM so Netflix can serve its business model
Anti-user, anti-privacy service profiteering off the ignorant consumer - fuck Netshit

>>62203115
The servers to host the content aren't a physical location?

>>62202630
>£38
Is this supposed to be a joke?

File: 22drqJ1.jpg (25KB, 480x319px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x319px

>>62202630
Am I the only one who noticed the talks in the article about how Google is adding a fucking ad blocker to Chrome designed to enforce "better ads standards", aka. blocking all ads that doesn't put shekels in Google's pockets somehow.

>>62203156
No, they're on the internet

>>62203108
For laptops: somewhat, decoding 720p HEVC video with a 1-2 mbps bitrate doesn't use much cpu resources on even sandy bridge i3 laptops (remember like 8 A53 ARM cores = 1 i3 sandy bridge core). This is a non-existant problem on desktops.

I should remind you 4K content is still scarce and 720p rips are still the most popular.

>>62203174
It's a scheme to get adblockers banned as anto-competitive.
Either they successfully strangle their competitors, or they save the ad industry
Win win

>>62202630
Piracy dies at least thrice a year nowadays

File: 1389723806704.jpg (16KB, 152x172px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 152x172px

>mfw I barely pirated anything in the last 10 years because there's no content that appeals to me anymore

>>62203142

Hmm, that's a pretty stupid way of looking at things.

>terrible selection
That's not their decision. The studios decide what get licensed and for how much and for how long it will be on the service.
>poor bitrate
>some content not even available above SD quality even with BDs out
Again, that's ALMOST entirely based on what is given to them by the studio.
>DRM
>at the forefront of HTML DRM, which aims to restrict the web for all
No studio would want to work with a company as big as Netflix if their properties aren't protected.
>sells user data to third parties as per their privacy policy
I'm not aware of this, but I believe it and it's not excusable.
>can't play above 720p in browsers other then Edge
That up to the browsers to implement.
>requires hardware DRM to even play 4K content
I agree, that's retarded, but again, they'd get no business if they didn't implement it.
>consumers buying new hardware are paying for DRM so Netflix can serve its business model
A symptom of corporations other than Netflix deciding standards.

I don't have Netflix either, because I can pirate and get away with it, and I don't give a shit. But honestly $8 for a pretty decent amount of existing and original content really isn't bad. I don't blame them for trying. I get what your saying, I just think you're blaming the wrong people.

File: 1496969524089.jpg (100KB, 800x900px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x900px

>>62202630
>Apple will allow its users to stream a movie for £38
>Apple will allow its users to stream a movie for $49

>$49
>to watch a movie on a shitty tiny ass 1136x750 iShit screen

LOVING

EVERY

LAUGH

No studio will ever agree to this.

>>62203333
They have already done this before, but the implementation was awful.

>>62202695
Those are sterling kroner

>>62203306
This. I don't even watch movies anymore.

>>62202694
Fuck off Daiz

>>62203434
Daiz would have recommended 16-bit HEVC with the extra placebo preset and a CRF of -28.

>be 4K UHD video camera in a tiny quadrotor drone disguised as a fly
>fly into movie theater without even paying for a ticket or popcorn
>livestream movie to the internet with about a 30 second buffering delay

pirates win again, better luck next time crapple.

>>62202962
>Most people use phones
>Citation: your ass
It's incredibly inefficient to download and watch torrents on a fucking phone. Most people I know use their phones for anything they can use their phone for, but not once have I met someone who torrents on their phone.

>>62203310
>That's not their decision
>Again, that's ALMOST
Not my problem, it's theirs that they can't negotiate and are at the whim of licensors. I'm simply not going to watch a film offered in abysmal SD DVD quality when a bluray of said film is available.
>if their properties aren't protected
Software DRM hardly works for "protection", if even (which is why they're pushing hardware DRM), it only serves to track users via proprietary binaries and restrict them. And the problem with HTML DRM is how it outs Netflix as a two-faced hypocrite entity. You may have heard them being for Net Neutrality? Well, HTML DRM and NN are completely contrary, so Netflix is just for NN not because they believe in it, but because it's both good publicity and also in their interests as a business to have their services unrestricted to all. Utterly despicable if you ask me when the next they're pushing HTML DRM as a standard.
>I'm not aware of this
They are a data mining company, they even leaked user data accidentally a while back. What you agree to by using their service is basically all your data and viewing habits being tracked by them.
>That up to the browsers to implement.
No, it's completely arbitrary. Their proprietary apps run 4k, but not browsers, besides Edge with with they have some sort of business deal with Microsoft.
>other than Netflix deciding standards
Maybe, but they also don't care; their "Original" content is restricted the same by DRM, despite not being licensed.
>honestly $8 for a pretty decent amount of existing and original content really isn't bad
You're not just paying with money, you're paying with your data as well. Notice their site doesn't work without cookies: they track everything. Another way to look at it is you're literally paying to be spied on, for your viewing habits to be shared with interested parties, and so on. Why would you pay for that, and support such practices?

>>62203615
Do you wanna know how I know you and your pals don't have jobs irl?

You guys are mean, I don't even know how to turn it off. :(

>>62203615
>work graveyard retail
>use the free WiFi to torrent all night using LibreTorrent

Wow you're wrong already

>>62202931
Blu-rays are like $15-$25 at most.

File: 0m94aBM.jpg (34KB, 480x409px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x409px

>>62202630
>$ 50 USD for one movie
>That I can download for free

>>62202829
Pacific rim was quite the spectacle

>>62205548
That's blank blu-ray without the movie.

>>62206230
lolno, you live in Brazil or something?

>>62206230
I've been buying new Blu-rays that also come with DVDs for $5 each

>>62206250
For old movies. Try to find new movie blu-ray that costs $5 in less than a month the movie premiered.

38 > 0

Checkmate

>£38
Literally no one, not even normies, are going to buy that

>Yeah dude let's stop people from pirating shitty cam rips and instead give them literal home release quality copies of movies after 2 weeks instead

>>62202699
Laziness, speed, reliability, costs.
Plenty of people from countries that get access to a movie God knows when after release would just pay out to see a movie as soon as they can and don't want to risk spending tons of time dl/in porn.

>>62203024
It's probably going to look like ass knowing apple

>>62202630
>55 maple dollars for a shitty low bitrate stream
fucking kek

This is the funniest thing I've ever read.

>$50
>FOR A MOVIE

>>62202630
L38? People are ready to wait years instead of paying L5 for a lot of shit.

>>62202667
Sauce?

>>62202630
>stop piracy by doing the exact opposite of the advantage of piracy

>>62208628
it'd be cheaper to just go to the movie theatre like 4 times in my town

>>62202829
Interstellar and Brdman were. But I can only think about those two. Interstellar on digital Imax was the shit.

>>62202630
No, this is just going to make getting high quality pirated rips shortly after release even easier. Thank you, based Apple.

>>62208737
this tbqh.

£38 > 0
>thinking_face_emoji.jpeg

File: tenor.gif (2MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x277px

>paying for streaming quality

>>62202630
>Apple will allow its users to stream a movie for £38 just 17 days after a film’s theatrical debut, thereby stopping piracy for good.
I don't think you understand piracy.

File: 1502231044159.jpg (83KB, 720x1024px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 720x1024px

>>62206371
I pirate movies while they're still in theatres.
Bootleg video camera quality footage.
I only care about quality when cgi it the main draw for the movie.
Like I wouldn't pirate Ender's game or city of a thousand planets unless it was HD.
I really care about the story and acting more, unless it supposed to be a spectical.

i don't mind waiting for the bluray remux to show up online
i just look for new movies by checking bluray releases, not theatre releases

>>62208897
>he willingly downloads CAMrips
i bet you download phone recordings of music coming from the radio, or tv shows recorded from a phone too?

38 euros is a week worth of food in most european countries, nobody will buy this shit

people who want it sooner will keep getting cam/ts
people who want quality will keep getting remuxes
people who don't want to pay will wait for either

also, this will just get dumped/capped and uploaded like everything else

>>62202734
Mactoddler/lame tripfag

>>62205635

Lmao are you kidding me? That movies is aids

>>62202630
You can't stop poor people from torrenting.
But you can't make em buy your shit either so the best use is just letting em torrent, make the movie good and enjoy the extra profit from the word of mouth.

What you don't want is people that actually have money torrenting.

>>62202630
but I pirate jew movies out of principle

>>62202630
>Apple will allow its users to

Piracy doesn't require apple devices

>stream a movie

Piracy lets you keep the movie forever

>for £38

Piracy costs $0

>just 17 days after a film’s theatrical debut

Piracy in best case copies the movie the first day it's shown in theaters and worst case copies the movie's earliest digital release

If apple's release is the earliest the pirate release will simply follow apple's if they don't release it sooner

>thereby stopping piracy for good.

HUE

HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUAHHUAEHAHUEHUAHEUAHEUAHEU

>>62203142
>>terrible selection

Agreed

Netflix as a service is good but they simply don't have the fucking movies that YOU want to watch

It's funny, companies invented copyright to protect each other and it is precisely because of copyright that they fail to outcompete a bunch of enthusiasts ripping movies and crowdsourcing bandwidth for distribution via torrents

> Apple could stop piracy forever
> £38 to stream movie
You're an iditot

>>62208698
yiffy is dogshit quality

>>62202695
>one movie
>renting
unsuprising kek

>>62208859
It's better than paying for satellite transmission quality. There's a special place in hell for those people.

>>62206239
What does Brazil have to do with Blurays

>>62209440
Then lobby them to use HEVC

>>62209464
He's probably talking about the absurd brazilian taxes that leads the country to mostly either pirate or just buy online where the taxes don't reach (yet).

>>62209515
Why they tax stuff so much? Last time I read Brazilians actually have a lot of money and go on literal shopping sprees when they visit USA, but at home shit's too expensive?

>>62203271
They'll only get their own adblocker banned that way you fearful moron.

>>62202630
Fewer normies torrenting is a good thing for piracy, not a bad thing.

>>62209640
Socialism.
This and also retarded "gambling" taxes that are applied to gaming consoles and the associated software.

>>62206304
Try finding a new movie worth watching (you cannot.)

>>62209695
>"gambling" taxes

That's hilarious...

I actually think every country should ban the shitty mobile/phone games. 99% are literal money sinks designed with addiction in mind.

File: 1492120641547.png (42KB, 600x620px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x620px

>"this thing you pay for will KILL piracy!!!!"
every time

>>62209734
Those are not taxed because they're not physical.

>>62202630
>$50 bucks to watch a movie once

yeah sure this is gonna be a killer.

>>62202931
bitch 4k blu rays are only 30 let alone regular blu ray

>>62202630
iToddlers can barely afford food and rent and buy their fruit toys on monthly payment plans, what makes you think they'll shell out $50 to watch a shitty low res stream?

i can go to a morning show at my local theater for $5 why the fuck would i pay $38?

>>62202694
HEVC is a meme. Can't wait for AV1 but there is still VP9

>>62210040

Explain why its a meme, retard.

>>62210040
If anything VP9 is the meme here. Literally takes longer to encode than HEVC and results in worse quality. Only someone as huge as jewgle could have the resources to waste on such a half baked video codec.

>>62202630
>still have to pay
Yeah that's not going to stop piracy at all lol people torrent because they're poor and/or cheap

>>62202630
>£38

Or I could go to a cinema, with a friend, and buy popcorn and drinks for both of us.

More realistically, I wait another day for someone to rip that movie.

>>62202630
>stream a movie once for £38
>I can pay $6 and see it in a theater earlier and in better quality
>I can still just pirate it anyways just as soon if not sooner and pay nothing

the value they're offering is terrible

>>62210146
this. even here in austarlia, ticket prices for movies nearby are like $18-22. there's no way i'd pay $40+ to stream it once

>Streaming a movie for an exorbitant cost is going to stop people from downloading movies for free
>Movies are the only thing people pirate
Are these people smoking crack?

>>62202630
>good guy apple making lifes of torrenters even sweeter
Thank-k-s

>>62203310
Question: do i get to see movies like...let's say from ernst lubitsch or some 1950 movies from akira kurosawa on netflix ?
Ooor is this all about millenial shit taste and new tv shows ?

>>62202630

So basically you're getting a digital copy right after the movie finished it's theatric run. I guess it's better than waiting for BD version for half a year.

I'll be pirating that much sooner

Thanks Apple! Yo did something right for ones

>>62210348
Apple just shits on film culture and art...no matter how fucked up the film industry is...this more fucked up

Man, i don't care about the ads on TPB, but if only they could remove the fucking pop ups i would gladly have ublock origin turned of the whole time just like i do on some websites i care about. i fucking hate pop ups, if you have pop ups on your website, fuck you!

Apple fankids happy to buy visual movie files...no dvd no vhd nothing..just a stream right after the movie been in theaters
Revolutionary !!

>>62210377

Hollywood has been shitting all over film culture and art for over a decade now.

I'm pretty sure that the reason film companies agreed to this deal in the first place is due to dwindling interest in movies in general, now that TV series offer better watching experience.

>>62210428
Yeah but why make a deal with the most greedy moneyhungry company then ?
Imstead they could support netflix for example...apple will drain the money from them and sue them then sue them again for making them sue them or whatever