Why do cameras and people often blur the background and focus on the main object? Why not just leave the whole image sharp without any distortion?
>t. retard
To put more focus on the actual subject without the background distracting from it and because bokeh looks good
>>62154521
because that's not how optics work, light always needs to be focussed.
there's a thing called hyperfocal distance though, which describes the circumstances that situation appears
>>62154521
Because that's not how optics work you fucking idiot
>>62154565
>because that's not how optics work
>>62154566
Not OP, but it doesn't make any sense. It looks like a poor approach to simulate depth on a 2D medium that obviously fails.
>>62154594
What part of "because that's not how optics work" do you not understand?
>>62154594
there is nothing being simulated at all
put something a couple of centimeters in front of your eye, focus on it and watch what the background does
ever wondered why people need glasses?
that's basic optics, mate
>>62154643
My whole vision is sharp and not blurry mate
>>62154594
>Not OP, but it doesn't make any sense
Ok then, go ahead and make a camera capable of focusing on all distances at once. You'll be a millionaire before you can tell your arse from your head.
>>62154661
>My whole vision is sharp and not blurry mate
uwotm8?
>>62154637
>>62154643
Which part of "it's just a meme effect and even my shitty cam from 2005 has a deeper focus" do you retards not unterstand.
>>62154717
go troll on /p/ for fucks sake
>>62154687
>Ok then, go ahead and make a camera capable of focusing on all distances at once.
Obviously, for OPs photo it would be a couple of meters and that exists.
Pretty sure in OPs photo it's just a meme yeah depth of field /v/ tier effect.
>>62154661
You're fucking retarded m8.
It's a stylistic choice you autist
>>62154743
see >>62154769
A shit tier choice, though.
>>62154769
Sometimes, yes, but most of the time there's no avoiding it because of fucking physics
>>62154521
For focus and it makes the shot more, I guess you could say, dramatic
lol you guys can't even answer a simple question properly, dumb dumbs as expected
Pretending to be retarded is the lowest form of trolling
>>62154521
Because your aperture is too wide...
>>62154521
hahahahahahahhaha
>>62154521
It's just a meme
iFags and similar posers think it looks cool because it's like in the movies
But actually you are objectively getting a worse picture by blurring half the detail
>>62154687
>Ok then, go ahead and make a camera capable of focusing on all distances at once. You'll be a millionaire before you can tell your arse from your head.
There is one. However it works simply by taking a shitton of pics simultaneously at different focals