Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: .jpg (36KB, 442x631px)
36KB, 442x631px
According to https://www.openhub.net/p/systemd/analyses/latest/languages_summary
Systemd has WH*PPING 373,941 lines of code, in different languages also. It is nearly impossible to audit this much code and devs with malicious intents could implement a simple backdoor or two without anyone noticing.
Who do you trust to run pid1 software on your computer? How can you trust these people?
Why you still haven't ditched systemd for a more simple, transparent alternative?
>>
File: 93bff62ff9131c77d761337839da8e26.jpg (931KB, 1032x1327px)
931KB, 1032x1327px
>>62095542
systemd just works anon
just replace with openrc if you want to be a autist
>>
>>62095542
Not defending the project but you haven't presented a reasonable argument. You have said large projects are harder to ensure correctness, systemd is a large project, so why do you trust the systemd devs to write pid1?
Well we both know that all that code doesn't end up in pid1 so your argument doesn't hold up at all. They could take great care with the small amount of code that ends up in pid1, you haven't given any evidence either way.
>>
Linux itself has over 19 million lines of code so I guess it can't be trusted either. If you can't trust the kernel it becomes kinda pointless to discuss whether you can trust anything else.
>>
Just trust us, goyim. We're not deep state niggers, promise
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3