https://arstechnica.com/?p=1151923
Should Ars be shut down for daring to criticize President of the United States of America Donald Trump?
I'll shut down your Arse with my dick.
>>62090559
>undercover CIA wanting 1 bi USD to "shut down trumps twitter"
Yeah, right. CIA became it's own thing, Trump shut them down.
>>62090559
I have a great solution the problem of Trump on Twitter.
If you don't like it, don't use Twitter. Nobody forces you to use it and you can very easily live a long and productive life without it. I have no sympathy for people who bitch about things they see online because they do it to themselves by using the internet in the first place. We live in an age where personal responsibility is pretty much non-existent and people need to grow up. Everyone is acting like a thin skinned baby these days it makes the world a much worse place. Grow some thicker skin and a set of balls and muster up enough testicular fortitude to handle mean words or fucking kill yourselves.
>>62090559
ArsTechnica is owned by Apple Corp.
Literally the biggest entity in the world.
>>62092563
[Citation needed]
>>62090559
Is really hard block him on twitter or something? how low can libtards can fall? literal childs
>donate to me to buy twitter goyim!
they are retarded and there is no cure for them
>>62090559
>bitch wants to buy Twitter to silence the president
This woman should be executed
>>62090559
Should they be shut down for criticizing the God Emperor? No.
Should they be shut down for polluting tech news with political shit? Yes.
Should they be shut down for holding a different ideology than me? Of course. Death to all who insult Allah.
>>62092706
They literally have tried to take him to court for blocking them on Twitter. They're addicted to their own misery. What pathetic people.
twitter investors getting really desperate
>>62090559
>>>/pol/
But, now that you're on the board of tech enthusiasts and not a armchair political circle jerkers. I just have to weigh in. I think no one should be censored. Not even people I have no respect for. I don't have respect for him because he's just doing what the evangelicals say. He's not his own man. He works for the banks and he's owned by evangelicals. There, I said it.
>>62090559
well, thats another way to start civil war 2.0
>>62094144
People you have no respect for are the people you should protect the speech of the hardest.
>he's just doing what the evangelicals say. He's not his own man. He works for the banks and he's owned by evangelicals