>Linus, it's Bill. The time has come. >Activate

File: linus-eff-you-640x363.png (213KB, 640x359px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 640x359px

Linus:

>>62007942
It's already active. It's called a package manager.

>>62008562
ZING!
oh wow. package managers btfo.
I hate gnu plus linux now.

>>62007942
>Pajeet, you know what to do. The rupies will be wired directly to your Microsoft Live account tomorrow morning if you see this through.
>

 poo.Init() 

>>62007942
*modifies your source code*

>>62008729
Hi Rajj! Can you teach us about POOP (principles of object oriented programming)?

File: 1402299875528s.jpg (10KB, 206x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 206x250px

>>62008792
Forgot pic.

>>62008562
>not forking every application you want to install and auditing every single line of code
>not editing said code to harden against government eavesdroppers and compiling yourself
>not wearing a stylish trilby covered in tin-foil as you stroke your body pillow of your waifu of choice
I don't think you know how to GNU/Linux.

>>62007942
Linus will just make a gaming PC video.

>>62007942
Activate systemd

BillyG doesn't give a shit about tech anymore. He's too busy buying condoms for people in Africa.

>>62009217
>>62009273
wrong linus

>>62008792
>*modifies your source code*
Actually, only the compiler has to be compromised. The source code of both Linux and the compiler would remain the same. This technique has been described a long time ago.

>>62009314
The creator of GNU/ Intel shill?

>>62009334
linus torvalds: linux fag
linus sebastian: windows (gay)mer

>>62009356
Is Torvalds the fat guy with the long hair?

>>62008562
>>62009066
>>62009317
Most modern package managers use signing to make sure it wasn't tampered with, and the major distros are usually targeted by white hats that assrape software for a living.
It's not guaranteed, but it is reasonable assurance. In comparison, even most proprietary operating systems are vastly more trustworthy than Windows.

>>62009383
>Most modern package managers use signing to make sure it wasn't tampered with
In binary distros you can't be sure - application could be tampered with before signing. In source base distros you still can be affected if YOUR compiler is tampered with.

>>62009375
thats stallmanu

>>62009450
Did he make GNU or the Linux Kernel?

>>62009066
>Not fabbing your own processor
>Not broadcasting in your own frequency
>Not making a fork of binary machine code called GNUary

>>62009444
That would require the distro to be compromised without the maintainers knowing, which is an extremely unlikely scenario.

>>62009444
> In binary distros you can't be sure - application could be tampered with before signing.
You have no idea how binary distros work.

> In source base distros you still can be affected if YOUR compiler is tampered with.
Theoretically possible, but with thousands of packages that is statistically impossible to mathematically do.

https://linux.slashdot.org/story/13/10/09/1551240/the-linux-backdoor-attempt-of-2003
> wait4: 'if ((options == (__WCLONE|__WALL)) && (current->uid = 0)) ...'

File: systemd.botnet.faggot.jpg (123KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1024x678px

>>62009257

File: bill.jpg (5KB, 140x140px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 140x140px

>Lennart? Yeah, it's me, Bill.
>Activate the systemd backdoor.

>>62007942
>>62008562
no, https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/commandline/wsl/install_guide

File: 146295334-linus-torvalds-from-finland-speaks-after-being-awarded.jpg.CROP.promo-mediumlarge.jpg (20KB, 590x421px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 590x421px

>>62007942
>I remember you asking me to put a backdoor in Linux a while ago
>When I said no, I meant it. Faggot.