Can anyone link me up with information about designing decentralized account system?
(in the registered user sense)
I guess I'll try asking on Reddit
>>61962869
>>61962530
Go away.
Immediately.
maybe Matrix protocol specifications for Identity Service API
Left = Feudalism
Middle = Capitalism
Right = Communism
>>61962530
Kerberos with a fail-over server?
>>61963020
That must be the most stupid post I ever read today.
>>61962886
/r/programming doesnt allow self posting
/r/askprogramming is "how do i start programming" level
>>61963007
Seems relevant to what I want to do. Are you familiar with their spec to tell me how good it is?
>>61963020
AGREE, BUT COMMUNISM IS STILL THE 1ST IMAGE. 3RD ONE IS SOMETHING ELSE.
>>61963139
>tell me how good it is
I should explain what I want to have:
I'm looking into what it takes to make decentralized web services.
The motivation and goal is that no single central authority controls the service. That means that the service should be provided by several independent hosts.
Anyone can become a host.
There's no trust between the hosts (ex: can't assume they'll properly sync data).
There's no trust between clients and hosts.
Clients need to be "load balanced" to different hosts, ideally in non-centralized way.
Any idea if Martix meets those demands?
>>61963020
why do ameriburgers keep doing this
>>61963199
I've only looked on Matrix for their session encryption, so not sure about their network model. There should be both independent hosts and nameservers, but no idea how they communicate or what they share.
> clients need to be load balanced to different hosts
Probably not matrix, you as client decide which host to connect and what nameserver hosts your account. But I guess someone could host more servers hidden behind load-balancer, he could only balance his server though.