>chrome is a botnet >firefox is becoming a slower chrome

>>61951744
Gimp

Two things I miss in Edge:
>HTTPS Everywhere
>VP8 WebM support
Otherwise I think it's great.

>>61951744
post the orginal pic pls

Firefox Nightly

>>61951744
my gf ruri is so cute

Use Ungoogled Chromium it's very nice

>>61951744
>firefox
>slower chrome
Nightly was faster than chrome the other day. There's literally nothing wrong with firefox and a 1-5% worse speed is unnoticeable on stable.

>brave is a botnet
It's actually open source isn't it? It's currently the best android browser. I don't see why it wouldn't get that status on PC too.

You can always use Iridium

>>61951744
w-what are the tissues for

>>61951744
>the other browsers are bad because datamining
>so the best choice would be the browser that requires the pinnacle of datamining operating systems

>>61952718
This. How can OP be so stupid? He's most likely shilling windows 10 and edge.

File: this_is_bait.jpg (45KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1000x1000px

>>61951744
>Only works on botnet10

File: Screenshot_20170817-134212.png (448KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1280x720px

>>61951896
Fuck off, lazy asshole

>vivaldi is a meme

People keep saying this but they don't explain why.

>>61952989
but it's not by Google. That's the whole point. How does that make it a meme?

>>61953015
Chromium is not by Google anon.

>>61953043
But it is.

>>61953096
No, Chrome is.

>>61951744
>chrome is a botnet
>uses botnet 2.0 a.k.a Edge instead
nice logic wintard btw
>lightweight
try running that on a 5 year old atom/celeron + 2GB of RAM

>>61953102
It may be open source but Google still wrote it and does 99% of the contributions to it. It's also such a massive and complicated codebase that nobody's actually audited it or anything - who knows what's even in there.

w3m my guy

File: 1451616566389.jpg (188KB, 500x688px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 500x688px

>>61952025
she really is

>>61953914
i want to fug ruri

File: 1451537209618.png (1MB, 1600x2743px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x2743px

>>61954027
but she's anon gf

I use firefox but it's kind of slow and I don't like how obnoxious they are about their political leanings.
I don't know what else to use, though. I like firefox's interface and extensions, I used to be a chrome user and switching from one to the other was annoying enough.

>>61955201
>it's slow
Are you using the 32bit version? Mozilla is retarded and defaults to a 32bit download on their homepage.

>>61955201
use nightly

>>61955214
No, 64bit.
>>61955250
It's the same, isn't it? Nightly is just more bleeding edge.

>>61955377
Nightly has shown to be faster than chrome.

>>61952576
Yup and most of firefox's speed improvement's (e.g. the Servo stuff) isn't even in Nightly yet. Plus they have more speed improvements that are scheduled to arrive by 59.

Firefox Nightly is awesome right now.

>>61956047
>>61956151
Is it really worth it uninstalling firefox to install nightly instead?

>>61956177
You install Nightly alongside it. No need to uninstall anything

>>61956177
Just install nightly and keep firefox.
If you're on linux you don't even have to install anything, just unpack the nightly's archive into a folder and you're ready to go.

>>61951744
Firefox 55. SIGNIFICANT speed boost, 57 will be a full GUI rework too. The fox is back, baby.

File: Lynx_vs._Firefox_rendering.png (238KB, 1278x670px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1278x670px

>>61951744
Lynx, it lets you browse the web without all the faggotry. I would have used it all the time if it weren't for the fact that chink moot forces us to use a botnet (javascript) to shit poast

Is the nightly really that much different?

QupZilla. Too bad it has no extensions.

Using icecate right now its by 960k and started at 300k after 20 hours of usage.

I always had to restart firefox after 4hours because it eat my whole ram.
Yes 4gb ramlet.

palememe has been rock solid for me on windows. and on linux, I prefer chromium

none of my firefox addons are compatible with nightly. ublock origin, gresemonkey, https everywhere, they're all "legacy" apparently

>>61956495
What the fuck are you doing? Firefox uses 500mb of RAM on my computer with 12 tabs open.

Edge is very fast and lightweight, but it's not worth installing Windows 10 for. Also it needs VP8 support, most sites might have moved on from it but it's very irritating when you find one that hasn't (hiromoot pls)

>>61951744
Arachne is the true lightweight browser of /g/

edge is a amazing, it's faster than the amount of time it takes for a refugee to rape someone

>>61951744
>firefox
going through a rough transition but has never stopped being the best modern browser in the sense of the bloated mess everyone is used to now, stuffed full of addons like a dirty slut.

>chrome
>opera
>vivaldi
>edge
>safari
non-free, irrelevant

>waterfox
>pale moon
derivatives are garbage, same as with GNU/Linux distros

>brave
I honestly don't know much about it. It's probably fine.

>qutebrowser
vi bindings are great, super fast and lightweight, built-in adblocker. main downside is no real addon support like firefox.

>elinks, w3m
pretty good but you're obviously missing out on some modern web features, which mostly matters if you browse major websites.

>>61956396
That's going full autistic neckbeard manchild, if you only want to be half of that just go with qutebrowser.

>>61956457
Yes. It's more or less Chrome with an FF logo.

>>61956664
Brave pretty bad right now. I use it as my backup browser since well, FF with privacy extensions break things. For me Brave fucks up constantly, like tabs will get stuck to the point where I have to restart the entire thing, and the UI just feels slow and clunky, and it has no extensions right now which makes it pretty pointless. Let's just say they have a lot of work to do to get it into a state where you can use it as your main browser.

File: DeepinScreenshot_20170817192107.png (176KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x800px

>>61952989
>it's literally just chrome with a different css skin

Well then, by all means, please show me how to do this in chrome?

File: 1496008478038.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>muh botnet
>BUT MUH BUTTNETTT
/g/ pls.

File: 1498209523107.png (254KB, 679x693px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 679x693px

>>61956664
>non-free, irrelevant
Freetards are unironically this deluded.

File: 1501862242248.jpg (36KB, 480x652px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x652px

>>61956752
how could i possibly make it look worse than it already does?

>chromelets will never know the ease and simplicity of tab-stacking

>>61956787
Firefox was the only major free browser and it won the browser wars. Other ones taking over is extremely disturbing and shows a more major issue in the minds of the population. People are too susceptible to advertising and misinformation. They didn't even realize what freedoms they were giving up.

>>61956800
Why would you even need to? Why do you have millions of tabs open? Learn to use bookmarks.

>>61956818
>won the browser wars
When was this? Firefox has never been on top.

>>61956837
You think? It seemed to be the most popular by far before Chrome showed up.

>>61951744
Icecat is all you need.

File: StatCounter-browser-ww-monthly-200901-201707.png (277KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1280x720px

>>61956845
ummm.... no, sweetie

>>61956845
IE was probably more popular.

>>61956872
>before chrome
>posts graph that has chrome on it from the start
is this a joke?

>>61951744
>waterfox eats too much ram
No it doesn't retard

>>61956826
I was like you at first, but then i used it. here's some useful examples:
>learning a new programming language
>have the API open, but don't feel like having to reload between concepts
>instead of sucking it up, i can use Alt-Left and Alt-Right to cycle between the stack

>watching a stream, but also want to look at comments
>again, Alt-Right/Left to cycle between tabs

>pinning tabs? Don't want clutter?
>dont worry, stack those tabs!

It really is a neet feature :^)

>>61956904
Fair enough. Though I have two monitors so most of that doesn't affect me, well and I don't program or watch streams. But mostly it just seems so inefficient space wise.

>>61956891
Chrome had fuck all users at the start and the trend was the same throughout the 2000s, with IE on top.
You could probably guess that if you had any bit of brain

>>61956872
sweaty*

File: 1453526045237.jpg (68KB, 400x330px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 400x330px

>>61956747
>Squints eyes
>blacked.com
so.... is that the average vivaldi user?

>>61956999
There's no point in assuming things when the data is actually out there.

>>61956942
maybe if you were using tabs horizontally, but vertically, they do quite the opposite, and help clean up a cluttered screen.

Vivaldi isn't perfect, desu, it still eats up shittons of ram like any other browser, but i've gotten so used to the way it works, i can't imagine using another browser.

>>61957013
you still haven't disproved the point that firefox was never on top

>>61957004
Welcome to your first day on 4chan, may I take your coat?

>>61957021
I wasn't trying to disprove it. I was saying it felt that way back in the day, someone else started posting [far too recent] graphs.

I don't know if it was.

>>61952104
Can it be built on Windows yet? The only Windows build is months old.

>>61951744
Yes
Microsoft botnet > google botnet everytime

>>61957168
Use Iridium

>>61956904
>alt-right
Back to >>>/pol/

>>61951744
>not using Iridium

>>61956664
>derivatives are garbage, same as with GNU/Linux distros
Waterfox isn't nuking addons so I'd say it beats firefox

>>61957258
>>61957323

Iridium takes an absurd amount of time to compile, to the point where my computer "ran out of" memory. It's also a behemoth to download, at 5GB+.

>>61952585
Spilt drink

>>61956845
FF peaked at like 35-40% market share, Chrome was the first browser to topple IE

Ungoogled chromium

>>61956787
>free as in freedom
>communism

Fuck off, jew

Post more feet

>>61951744
>firefox is becoming a slower chrome
That doesn't even make sense.

>brave is a botnet placebo
>open source
>ad blockers built in
>literally built with privacy in mind
You have no idea what you're talking about.

>>61958580
it's slow and is a chrome skin

>>61951744
literally just use anything and quit whining
the Korean boys you download wont change

>>61952987
Because the devs are retarded and the only thing they really do is make a inconvient chrome
I like it though

>>61951744
whenever i use firefox and try to get it to remember 4chan's cookies to remember my style, it still deletes them.

chrome doesn't

>>61962397
How exactly is it inconvenient?

>>61956818
Or maybe people value performance and ease of use more than ideology. Chrome just werks, and that's enough for most people. They aren't retards because they don't masturbate to FOSS like you.

>>61965175
>>>61962397
Yeah this. I use it without any problems.

Specially since they actually made tabs draggable and droppable

>>61953914
I would snuggle snuggle her tbqh familia

>>61953043
This is like saying Firefox isn't made by Mozilla or Gnome isn't made by Red Hat. Technically true, but also retarded.

>using edge yesterday
>2 tabs open
>1 gig of ram used

I have 8 gigs of ram but it still crashes on me. i have no idea whats wrong with it

>>61951889
Botnet. I do like it though, it's the only way I don't shoot myself when I have to use a Windows 10 machine.

>>61951744
How do you store your bookmarks??

>>61951744
Firefox Aurora my friend

Firefox nightly, best browser atm

>>61957363
Why compile it?

>>61956495
What's wrong with your set up, I have 40tabs open and barely a gig of usage.

>>61951744
>>chrome is a botnet
...
>is edge the true lightweight browser of /g/?

are you retard or something?

File: 1477900211065.jpg (701KB, 752x1200px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 752x1200px

>>61958541

>>61951744
I have brand loyalty to Firefox.

>>61956530

retard

>>61970213
Thanks for your help

>>61970291

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases

wow bro hard

I'm using Icecat and very happy with it.

I wonder if it'll ever follow the webextensions only nightly build since theoretically it improves security and performance.

>>61951744
What about Yandex?

>>61956344
Without extensions, fullblown SJW. No thanks.

Is Opera really a chinese browser?

File: ripopera.png (94KB, 772x692px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 772x692px

>>61972472

It should be mandated that they explicitly inform the user of transfer of ownership as soon as it occurs.

I've been trying Brave, It seems to use less RAM than Chrome (which I was using before), but it has crashed twice in the few hours I've been trying it, I can't use 4chan X, the built in adblocker is cool but I could already do that with extensions.

What do you guys think of Iridium, I might try that next.

>>61956682
luakit > qutebrowser

>>61951744
>waterfox eats too much ram
buy more ram
SOLVED