THANK YOU BASED INTEL AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

Is that how much prices are going up?

>>61947076
Wait that's DOA.
Good job Intel!

>>61947076
>0.01$ has been deposited into your account.

>>61947093
no, temperatures
core/vrm

>>61947076
is it pissmark numbers again?
can't wait for monday

>>61947113
Sysmark.

So the rumours were fucking true.
Like I mentioned on a thread a week ago, shit like this is why we love AMD.
All it took was A SINGLE COMPETITIVE PRODUCT LINEUP from AMD and Intel upped its core counts by 5% across the board. This is the most significant change to Intel's consumer product lineup since Nehalem.
Now if they'd just start soldering the heatspreaders onto their chips and shipping decent stock coolers again....

>>61947208
That's even worse.

>>61947208
PFFFTTTTTT
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And think. all of this, and EPYC isn't even on sale yet.

If you'd believe intel, they've been doing 18% performance bumps every fucking generation.

>>61947231
*50%

>>61947236
Oh, they can't up the core counts against EPYC, they are probably hitting the reticle limits with poolake-x already.

Oh boy I can't wait to be a useless sack of shit and run sysmark all day!

>>61947267
S-sysmark is best.
Buy Intel!

>>61947236
>>61947252
Saying that, just checked a UK based server retailer, a dual EPYC 1U will start at £2400, but that's with basically nothing


http://www.rackservers.com/Configurator.aspx?S=2376

This isn't news. Everyone knows it's Skylake with moar cores.

Where is the pricing?

>>61947282
£2400 is nothing to the target market for EPYC.

>>61947076
>comparing 4c vs 6c
>LOOK AT DIS IMPROVEMENT GUIZE! PURE PERFORMANCE

>amdpajeets already shitting up the thread

>>61947076
I don't get it.

File: 1502143993622.jpg (81KB, 444x444px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 444x444px

>>61947076
DELICIA

>>61947076
>50% increase in cores gives 50% increase in performance
holy shit

File: 1498256245652.jpg (30KB, 216x250px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 216x250px

>>61948257

>>61947076
>still using bingu or meshu design

>>61947076
In order for Intel get the kind of performance incrase they're claiming here it would have to have 5 GHz single core and 4.4 GHz all core. They're lying out their ass with Sysmark garbage as usual.

>>61947076
>tfw intel could make a 4 core g4560 that would destroy ryzen 3 in everything for a lower price

>>61948353
That's called an i5-7400. And it actually loses to Ryzen 3 because it can't OC. And if they wanted to lower prices on those they would have.

>>61947076
Oh now they step up their game!

Fucking jews.

>>61947076
>i3 4c/4t, 不是 4c/8t

4chan 欺骗了我

>>61947076
THANK YOU BASED MINERS

GAYMERS ARE FINISHED & BANKRUPT

>>61948373
where can i get a i5-7400 for around $80 i would gladly buy one for that price

File: lies.jpg (227KB, 1400x789px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1400x789px

>>61948257
You'd have to be a seriously deluded fanboy to take any of Intel's numbers at face value. Which you clearly are saying stupid shit like "amdpajeets"

File: india inside.jpg (387KB, 1500x1164px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1500x1164px

>>61948257
>pajeets

>>61948373
>it can't oc
1st gen zen isn't that good for oc anyways, most people can't get above 3.9Ghz

File: 85416134.jpg (285KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1024x678px

>>61948385
你欺骗了你自己

>>61947076
>based intel
im sorry but what?
https://youtu.be/osSMJRyxG0k

>>61948517
An OCed Ryzen 3 1200 will still beat a locked i5-7400.

>>61948517
Yes goy a 20-30% OC is barely nothing. No goy don't look at the 10-15% OC on K chips. Look at the absolute value, big ain't it?!

>>61949746
>actually taking this shitposting seriously.
Are you new?

>>61952171
right back at you summerfag

>>61949855
No it wont.

>>61954906
Yes, it will.

File: uma_cry.png (350KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 672x794px

>>61947076
>autistic meme: "FINISHED/ BANKRUP
>Favela shitposting
>Based Brazilian education

TY SOPA DE MACACO