If i say "I DO NOT ACCEPT" loud and clear while "clicking

File: About Windows.png (44KB, 505x443px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 505x443px

>>61884499
What??

I used to do it when I was younger.

Nowadays I know that spoken statements are only legally binding if there's witnesses who can testify.
So if you ask your coworker to come from the next cubicle over, and indeed press accept while saying out loud "By doing so I am not agreeing to anything" then you've tricked the system.
Otherwise it's useless.

>inb4 you agree to something by clicking the button
You never agreed to this statement. You first need to agree that pressing button states acceptance of terms, and *then* press the button, thus really acknowledging them.
If there's witnesses that you didn't agree to the first, you never agreed to either.

>>61884639
My mom always hear me!
So ok, i'm fine.

And, what if i look away from the monitor and just press things(supposing is a touch screen monitor)

>>61884499
>are you guys that stupid too

>>61884685
A judge would say that it's negligence if you say "I just clicked randomly while looking away from the screen". It's like saying "I was just signing with a pen without looking at what I was signing". A better strategy would be "I was aware of such statement and I didn't agree with the conditions".

>>61884685
>My mom always hear me!
Not good enough because she's not aware what exactly are you not agreeing to.
She needs to be able to testify on this matter.

>what if i look away from the monitor and just press things
It'd make a case, but it's a super-weak argument. Like the infamous "my cat walked on my keyboard".
No, not really - it wouldn't work.

>>61884804
>>61884814
Thanks for the clarifications, so, i do now have a FREE windows?
I mean, if a Microsoft memeber would come to me and say that, that is his intellectual propriety and to uninstall i can say: "no it isn't, the background is different" right?

I just want to be sure.

>>61884846
Yeah