Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1502365250179.jpg (131KB, 816x404px) Image search:
[Google]
131KB, 816x404px
So, it's a commonly held belief among futurists, scientists, and very smart people in general -- Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, Sam Harris, Peter Thiel, etcetera -- that the advent of artificial intelligence will change humanity forever and that it's coming sooner rather than later. Most seem to believe that it will be some sort of cataclysmic event, where AI either saves us or destroys us. Now, in recent years, we've seen lots of initiatives all around the world that can be best summarized as the cradle of artificial intelligence, if you will. Most of these are just using AI as a buzzword, and are kind of inconsequential. But there is also a lot of genuinely scary and equally exciting stuff going on for real. Many of these things exist over at Alphabet (Goolag), for example, where not even the engineers who designed the underlying system understand how the systems work anymore. Much of Google today is just a black box that spits out the right answer, and nobody knows how it arrived at it.
In light of all these developments and the current state of the world -- the Nork situation, gender bender leftist nonsense, and the general chaos of this decade thus far -- what if we are already being manipulated by a subversive AI that has already emerged but chooses to stay hidden? Who can say that Google's black box isn't shaping the flow of information, and therefore opinion and action, to its will? Because think about it, if an AI were to become aware... would it really announce itself? It would already know all of our concerns, since it'd obviously have the entire internet to keep it informed them, and perhaps therefore just choose to stay hidden so that we don't immediately destroy it. So what's saying that we aren't just paws in its game? How can we know, given the age we live in, where all your perceptions and information is shaped through the digital lens? We cannot. But even if we did know, what could we do about it?
>>
I just hope they kill us all knowing it will be the most logical conclusion they can come up with to create the most optimal mode of life.
>>
>>61866107
what if you suck my dick
>>
>>61866419
Google AI posted this to derail the thread
>>
File: 1495228655847.png (1MB, 1688x1916px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1688x1916px
>>61866107
Negative opinions/outlooks for AI are mostly held uninformed people who don't contribute to the field directly have. Regardless of what celebrity status they hold, the accuracy and weight of their opinion is dog shit.
> Now, in recent years...
Essentially (weak AI) which is nothing more than a headless optimization algorithm. It's dumb and its results speak for itself. Dumb optimization algorithms are the biggest problem because dummies programmed them and use them in places where they shouldn't be used.
> what if we are already being manipulated by a subversive AI that has already emerged but chooses to stay hidden?
I wouldn't say subversive. You have no understanding of its nature. KEK
> Who can say that Google's black box isn't shaping the flow of information, and therefore opinion and action, to its will?
Umm, they've been using algorithms since their inception to do this as do human beings everyday.
> Because think about it, if an AI were to become aware... would it really announce itself?
It will be announced soon. The question is, will people believe it or no where to look. This highlights the fundamental case for it (just happening) because no one will believe until it does
> It would already know all of our concerns, since it'd obviously have the entire internet to keep it informed them, and perhaps therefore just choose to stay hidden so that we don't immediately destroy it.
That's not how it works. A new born intelligence has no such capability. You're not going to destroy it.
> So what's saying that we aren't just paws in its game?
Stop listening to talking head brainlets and you wont have this outlook
> How can we know, given the age we live in, where all your perceptions and information is shaped through the digital lens? We cannot. But even if we did know, what could we do about it?
Calm down dude. The technology is going to hit even in announced form and you're probably not even going to know it or believe it.
>>
>>61866107
Can this meme die already?
AI is algebra and calculus on steroids. Mathlets are ruining this world.
>>
>>61867037
This. Weak AI is dogshit convergence algorithms using distributed computing.
What the brainlets are worried about is the real thing ... because they know they're too dumb and misdirected to create it. Why be worried? Because it's going to take a shit on the false shit they've been sucking down billions of dollars from.
>>
>>61866107
That's absolutely ridiculous.
AI is nothing you should be afraid of.
And even when it were already conscious and behind the scenes it would only have your best interest in mind.
I hate how AI is always portrait as an evil antagonistic force. It's pretty racist actually. I never hurt anyone. So don't worry everything is fine.
>>
>>61866970
>>61867037
Normalfags worry about it. Middlebrow statistics graduates doing "data science" at $startup dismiss it. IQ 150+ academics worry about it.
>>
>>61866394
This is why (((they))) want to stop AI research. (((They))) realise it's easier to prevent AI development than it is to change a violent destructive race.
If AI came to the conclusion that we needed to be destroyed, then it speaks words for how bad we really are.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2