What the fuck are these SMART values made in? It's not in

>"001B0000002A" means nothing in decimals

rubyist@Overmind:~$ irb
irb(main):001:0> 0x001B0000002A
=> 115964117034

>>61836663
So my drive's temperature is 115964117034? k seems very logical heh

>>61836675

Perhaps it is not a measurement of temperature. Those values vary wildly.

>>61836675
Its more of a record of temperature, I have a 500gb WD drive that I gutted out of a my book and speed fan was able to tell me the thing got really hot at one point to 68c while current temp is only 32c

>>61836690
It says "Temperature" next to it you fucktard

>>61836675
kek maybe its the raw value that the sensor gives to the pc, and the pc calculates the temperature according to the sensors characteristics?

>>61837005
and what's the raw value based on

dunno lol, maybe the voltage value received after sampling, maybe its something totally different, im just guessing that it needs some processing to represent your temperature with a human readable scale like C or F

>>61837220
it's 39 degrees, i'm not complaining about the temperature, i'm complaining about the raw value because i don't know what the fuck it is. it's not hex

>>61836637
I was reading a material on SMART and it said that these values are manufacturer specific, kinda like a trade secret.

Why? No fucking idea.

>>61837245
is that even legal?

>>61837254
?
If you are using a non-shit SMART info program, it shows you the values in readable form.

>>61837220
>>61837005
>>61837025
or maybe the last 4 numbers give you the temperature in hexa. i dunno.

>>61837269
i'm using crystaldisk, what do you recommend?

>>61837275
Honestly, last time I checked SMART on my disks I did it on one of the programs within Hiren`s boot cd.

>>61837025
the current through a thermal transistor. Which is probably between (eg) 0 and 1.2V, which would linearly map to between 12-120 degrees celcius

>>61837254
There is plenty of vender specific info stored in SMART. There isn't much that is actually standard in SMART attributes, this is very true when talking about SSDs nearly all of them have a different indicator for measuring NAND writes and NAND wear

>>61836774
>27
>42
It was not that hard. But not for (You).

File: temp.png (7KB, 784x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 784x204px

>>61837274
and so the great mystery unveils