Ok this is the coolest setup in history. >Upto 18 cores >Upto

>5k screen
Can someone defend the existence/purpose of this?

>>61808602
epeen size

>>61808602
For editing 4K without scaling while still having space for tools.

>>61808602
so you can edit 4k video

>18 cores with Mac thermals
lol 700MHz

>>61808487
It's the kind of computer that can inspire awe in me the same way the octocore mac pro did when I was still using a celeron 2.4ghz based on pentium 4. It really does live up to the mac pro name in that regard.
The fact that they got it into an imac chassis is awesome to some and a total deal breaker to others.
It's not a personal computer. You buy it because it makes you money. It would probably just be replaced by a newer model anyway.
I think it's awesome.

>>61808602
Mac Pro replacement.

>ecc RAM
stupid ass shit

File: 170607_imac_pro_rear.png (219KB, 590x491px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 590x491px

>>61808653
They redesigned it, idiot.

There's 2 giant heatpipes now.

>>61808650
But then how do you edit 8k video?

>>61808712
You don't edit 8k video dumbass.

Unless you want to preview with 1/16th quality in Premiere or some shit.

File: 771c16e6812156913fae48025ef626cb-imagejpeg.jpg (28KB, 476x687px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 476x687px

>>61808712
multiple 5k monitors

>>61808648
Isn't that what a second monitor is for?

The one you have anyway?

>>61808702
It's finally on par with other offerings in the class. Actually blows them out of the water until HP updates the Z1.

>>61808487

What is the cost of this piece of shit?

Why even bother with an iMac when you could just use a regular pc? I seriously don't want to be rude but MacOS isn't any more user friendly, unless you need to use a trackpad, which isn't something you need to do on desktop. Plus those low profile keyboards drive me insane, just as a tangent.

>>61808684
>>61808710
Fuck off with your piece of shit made in china iShit pro you fucking shills, no sane person would buy that garbage

>>61808761
Starting at $4,999

>inb4 too expensive

Plenty of people have tried to price this with other companies like HP and the Apple iMac Pro comes out to be cheaper than the rest.

>>61808780
>t. Angry pajeet who loves plastic piece of shit PCs and Wangblows.

Literal sand nigger.

Isn't this an 8-bit display?

>>61808793
Do you even know who the CEO of apple is?

File: 5673f88bdd089539748b45e8-1920.jpg (148KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1920x1080px

>18 core xeon and vega

>>61808818
Tim Cook?

>>61808783
>Plenty of people have tried to price this with other companies like HP
You literally can't compare them. The Z1 G3 is an 1151 system.

HP definitely has the edge on repair-ability, though, which could mean a lot to businesses if Apple doesn't get their business support game up.

>>61808487
>uding the smiley with a carat nose

>>61808855
Stop comparing HP with Apple.

They're totally different in terms of platforms.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 19.18.58 .png (245KB, 1396x1052px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1396x1052px

>>61808487
I'm the biggest fucking macfag there is but holy shit can you possibly shill any harder?

>>61808904
Hows the Radeon 460 on the MBP?
Is it better than nVidia 750m or the 2015 AMD dGPU?

>>61808803
Sure is.

>>61808895
What are you fucking talking about? If they want to play in the workstation game, they have to play with the big boys.

>>61808710
thats a benis

>>61808933
Macs are not PCs you fucking idiot.

Companies who use Macs usually have a huge cache of Macs for their artists/employees.

No one fucking uses HP in the design world. Only for 3d bullshit.

>>61808702
>billions of bit
>what could go wrong

>>61808922
Upgraded from the 2013 MBPr with the 750m. Drives the 5k monitor better (read: actually usable in lightroom) than the 2013 could drive a 4k.
Haven't tried a single game on it (I got a pc with a 960 for that)

File: b9c990eb-7fca-43b7-8355-dc84512a0130.jpg (72KB, 600x833px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 600x833px

>>61808487
>>61808940
I just see Moloch.

>>61808969
Nice! Does it lag at all? My 2014 is pretty much the same as the 2013 and I want to get the 2017.

The dGPU is getting long in the tooth, but CPU is pretty dank still.

I don't gayme, I only run Adobe apps on this thing.

>>61808487
Meanwhile a TR in an ugly ass case supports 1TB ECC DDR4 and will upgrade to a 24c Zen2/3 successor plus have power/thermal headroom for a GPU not drastically underclocked/undervolted to avoid turning its housing into an actual literal toaster.

>>61808991
MBPro after 2015 has the SSD soldered to the motherboard. No replacement or upgrade possible. Still the mid-2015s.

>>61808958
>No one fucking uses HP in the design world.
What is "design"? HP is popular in animation, oil and gas, science, and engineering. So is Dell.
>Macs are not PCs you fucking idiot.
Oh it's bait.

>128 GB of RAM

for what purpose

>>61808972
M'loch
*tips menorah*

File: 1502059689973.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>>61809012
>Zen
>In a professional environment

L M F A O

>>61809031
High bitrate video editing, 3D modeling, CAE (if Apple is smart they'll partner with Siemens with the new Mac Pro to get NX to actually do CAE things on macOS), animation, shit like that.

File: 1501830339819.gif (2MB, 288x430px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 288x430px

>>61809015
Yeah I know, I was just saying 2017 looks delicious to more efficient dGPU and 2 generation newer CPU.

>>61809019
>What is "design"? HP is popular in animation, oil and gas, science, and engineering. So is Dell.

Yeah no one cares. This is not the Mac market at all.

Macs have a 7-8% marketshare, and it's mostly in post production and the arts (ie graphic design, illustration, etc).

>>61809031
After Effects eats up ram like crazy.

I have 64GB in my Hackintosh and use all of it.

>>61808991
No lag for normal use. LR is pretty snappy, it's not quite instantaneous (maybe a half second) when switching between pictures, but panning and messing with sliders is smooth. Running 24MP photos fwiw.

>>61809085
>Yeah no one cares. This is not the Mac market at all.
>Macs have a 7-8% marketshare, and it's mostly in post production and the arts (ie graphic design, illustration, etc).
I have literally no idea what you're trying to say. Drawing dicks on your Cintiq doesn't require 18 cores, ECC RAM, or workstation graphics, so how does this support your argument that Apple is going to compete well with who they're obviously trying to compete with?

>>61809133
You fucking nigger autist, what's so hard to understand that Apple is catering to the 7-8% Mac users who need a CheeseGrater Mac Pro replacement until a real Mac Pro comes out next year?

Are you FUCKING DUMB?

>>61808487
>Mouse/Keyboard/Trackpad combo
What, no iJoystick®™?

>>61809052

>Paying 5x more for no difference because Ryzen already supports ECC

Keep sucking the workstation jew

File: 7820-motoko_8.jpg (884KB, 1484x2099px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 1484x2099px

>>61809246
>Thinks HEDT and Server CPUs are exactly the same

LMFAO

Enjoy your SuperGlued™ CPUs.

File: 1494301641338.png (123KB, 622x936px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 622x936px

>>61808487
>Ok this is the coolest setup in history.

I think you mean hottest.

>>61809283
>2015
>Old model

>>61809186
>what's so hard to understand that Apple is catering to the 7-8% Mac users who need a CheeseGrater Mac Pro replacement until a real Mac Pro comes out next year?
The fact that those people are not going to spend 5k on an iMac and, if they can, they've moved on already.

>>61809283
MACTODDLERS BTFO

>>61808818
he answered it pajeet, tell him what he wins!
>inb4 a bowl of curry and a free download of MS paint on the windows store!

File: C591C6F2-3A9A-4EF4-A211-905073064829-1781-0000018FD7CD929E.jpg (25KB, 512x807px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 512x807px

>>61808835
I can imagine the city wide fire

>>61808487
>>Amazing 5k (and unmatched) screen
http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-ultrasharp-32-8k-monitor-up3218k/apd/210-alez/monitors-monitor-accessories
5k is old hat.

>>61808710
The iMacs have always used heatpipes to transfer heat off the CPU and GPU to the heatsink.
The big problem here is that those are not giant heatpipes and there are only two for an 8 to 18 core CPU.

That's a lot of heat that they need to be able to transfer. At least there are now two fans, but the heatsink looks no bigger than the previous generations so my bets are throttling under any sustained load.

>>61808487
I wonder how absolutely livid Apple is right now. They've already promised a Vega GPU and an 18 core i9, both of which have proven themselves to be housefires, in the already stupidly thin chasis.

File: 1498085425954.jpg (245KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 640x480px

>>61808487
AMAZING $20,000 DOLLAR COMPTUER BY MAC!!

in reality you know that this is better value as most normalfags dont do much other than web browse and besides they use their phone more often

As much as I like Mac, being on a 2012 Macbook Pro, and wanting something new, I probably won't get one of these.
The maxed out version is going to cost more than the 2 kidneys I currently have.

>>61808710
>giant heatpipes
>attached to 3mm tall heatsinks

>>61809723
Do you think they got to test it on early samples? Or did they take similar TDP chips already available and try them?

Either way this machine could be impressively bad.
Apple has a history of not having the best luck with the silicon.
https://youtu.be/knMM9dRwIH4?t=327

File: dell_up2715k_27_5k_5120x2880_computer_monitor_1081827.jpg (41KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1000x1000px

>>61808487
>Amazing 5k (and unmatched) screen

>>61809794
Small problem is that Dell doesn't sell them anymore.

>>61808712
With a wx9100

>>61808487
>screen
It's a display you fucking tech illiterate mongrel

>>61808487
>Killer MOuse/Keyboard/Trackpad Combo
>Shitty Chicklet keyboard
What?

>>61808487
>Single AMD GPU
>For graphics work
Into the trash it goes.

>>61808710
>Built themselves into a "thermal corner" with the trashcan pro
>Build another pro computer
>Yet again try to cram pro components into a needlessly tiny and cramped space

what could possibly go wrong

File: 1483920176883.png (709KB, 1182x1611px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 1182x1611px

>>61808487
>(and unmatched) screen

Poo in the fucking loo Ranjeet.

>>61808487
I just wish they'd put it in a real case

Now, knowing Apple, it'll inevitable either burn through the screen or melt steelbeams

No freesync, why?

>>61808487
5k€ though..
>poorfag
theres a difference between expensive and overpriced, and only retards fall for the later

>>61808487
>tfw an Epyc 7401p and 2x 1080s would have been the same price and fit in the same power envelope and would have been faster across the board
Why is Apple so bad at this?

>>61809283
>cramming a M295X into a low profile case
it's like they were asking for it.

>>61809318
You clearly underestimate the hardcore Mac user.

File: dusTs2U.png (447KB, 500x643px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 500x643px

>>61808712
i can tell no one here has ever done any real editing before, because you wouldnt edit or even scrub 4k video directly (well, not until recently).

here is how editing works: the hi res footage is compressed into standard def copies, which are then loaded in and edities with. this allows fast previews / edits, and a sane use of system resources.

when the edit is final, these 'proxy' files are simply replaced with the hires footage and a master / production render is made (which is then compressed for delivery, say broadcast or bluray).

using this approach, you can edit and render any resolution you want to, as long as you can fit the video on disk. only recently have production suites been able to realtime edit uncompressed hidef footage, and even then they require some fairly pricy hardware.

source: editor/compositor with imdb credits. suck my ass, faggots.

File: 1502244564180.jpg (50KB, 960x852px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 960x852px

>>61812402
If you actually knew what the fuck you were talking about, you would call this "Offline editing".

Now kindly fuck off you degenerate nigger who edits home videos for his Granny and thinks he's a professional.

Do you suck dicks?

>>61809272
>Intel can't use glue because their thermals would literally evaporate the glue
i'd hate to think whats going to happen to the mac

File: XaSl7cJ.png (65KB, 667x558px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 667x558px

>>61812450
> doesnt use your preferred buzzword
oh i'm sorry i triggerred you, special snowflake, i'll toss more keywords in the next time

the post still stands, try harder

When do you guys think Apple is going to invent the mechanical keyboard?

>>61812497
They already did in the 80s and 90s, dimwit. Everyone copied.

>>61812495
>preferred buzzword
No, it just shows that you're just talking out of your ass.

Post IMDB them and pic with timestamp, faggot.

File: 1501658500796.jpg (146KB, 1600x1424px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1600x1424px

>>61812450
> tfw you identify as an "offline edit"

>>61812011
This isn't for consumers retard

>>61812472
>Do you suck dicks?
"I bet you dont have the goddamn decency to give him a reach around." -Sgt Emeory

>>61812537
In theory we're all consumers. Even big corporations are consumers.

File: 1501363376849.jpg (95KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 480x640px

>>61812524
> explains what "offline editing" is
> doesnt know what he's talking about
damn jamal, really got me there..

> post your personal info on 4chan
hey, that sounds like a smart and reasonable thing to do in order to win an argument with an autist that doesnt even make valid criticisms

have you considered suicide?

>>61812561
Ok thanks for clearing things up for me.

You definitely don't know shit about post production.

You barely even threw out the word "proxy" at the last minute just to make it seem like you know what you're talking about after a few minutes of Googling.

Fucking faggot, go kys.

>t. Been professionally editing since the early 90s.

File: 1501639204081-1.jpg (37KB, 720x714px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 720x714px

>>61812572
so by your standard, an editor is only as good as how many buzzwords they use? ok, good argument there.

and maybe, just maybe, i was explaining things in a simple manner so everyone could understand. if you'd like, we could have a buzzword battle..

i bet you scrub dithered 8bit on your late 90s crt, pleb. bring it

>t. been professionally editing since the 1800s

> computer literally melting infront of you

>>61808487
nah.

File: csnoe.jpg (408KB, 1780x1000px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1780x1000px

>>61808487
>coolest setup in history

File: 1502238509226z.png (154KB, 298x300px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 298x300px

>>61812628
>Buzzword

It's not a buzzword, child. It's literally a process that goes between 2 different editorial teams (offline and online).

Although the gap has closed a bit nowadays because some productions even skip offline in general and go straight to DI from their online edit.

>>61812699
That disgusting mouse pad and wired mouse cable run.

File: 1492928971193.jpg (30KB, 451x451px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 451x451px

>>61812628
> tfw you completely annihilate a fellow anon

well, i'm gonna fap and goto sleep jamal. it was fun.

File: 1502079467719.jpg (113KB, 564x708px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 564x708px

>>61812628
>>61812724
Stop samefagging.

You got caught, deal with it, Jake.

Also you must be 18 to post here.

>>61812722
> tfw your argument is still 'you didnt use an industry term and instead explained the process'
at what point are you going to realize that you dont have a valid argument?

>>61812779
Dude stop samefagging.

You lost because you were being fake.

File: 1501262135576.jpg (68KB, 412x457px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 412x457px

>>61812751
who is jake? and i wasnt hiding my samefagging, jamal.

i once worked on a film that was shot mostly in bulgaria on red cameras. instead of shipping the hard drives back everyday to the us, the dailies were compd to sd and ftp'd overnight in an automated batch process. we could edit footage shot yesterday the morning we came in. when shooting wrapped, they brought all the drives back and we linked up the hires to the proxies.

there, was that enough buzzwords for you jamal? oh, i'm sorry 'processess'. thats the term you prefer. i think i would hate working with you.

File: 1491442415499.jpg (368KB, 894x894px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 894x894px

>>61812822
"I dont have an argument" The Post.

i'm laughing.. i bet you'll get that intership anon, just keep working on your youtube channel, i believe in you..

File: 1442181102972.jpg (228KB, 835x899px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 835x899px

>macshit
Enjoy your Indian crap.

>>61808710
+400 watts CPU and 300 watts GPU

File: photos-highsierra-6c.jpg (234KB, 1360x765px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1360x765px

>>61812842
>i once worked on a film

Lol, low budget porn videos don't count, Jake.

Post IMDB and time stampped pic or get the fuck out.

>>61812890
"I made a false statement and now I'm in deep doodoo because someone who actually knows what they're talking about called me out on 4chan"

Ok Marques Brownleenigger

lmao go kys, you sad sack of shit.

>>61812914
Indians are usually not in the higher ups at Apple.

The industrial design and graphic design team ran by Jonny Ive are 99% white and/or Asian (the good kind).

The pajeets are low shit tier engineers who no one cares about.

File: 1502155864898.png (355KB, 777x656px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 777x656px

>>61808958
>Personal computers are not PCs (personal computers)

>>61812927
Over heat engineers

>>61812936
>Shilling this much for some poojeet/chink corporation

lmfao

>>61808710
Guarantee you that thing will not move well over 500 watts of heat away.

File: download.jpg (6KB, 176x151px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 176x151px

>>61812984
Shilling for who? I don't remember supporting anyone, I think you got the wrong anon.

Pic related is (You)

>>61813015
>Sucking this much corporate dick.

>>61809753
This laptop will never stop being sexy.

File: 1501607483899.jpg (64KB, 361x691px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 361x691px

>>61813059
Now I know that you're baiting but like c'mon

>>61808487
>one button mouse
enough said

>>61813067
Sexy as a tool and looks perfect for the job, not some alien wanna be faggot shit

>>61813121
>Not understanding it has virtual left and right click

Are you this dense?

>>61813067
Ugliest shit ever.

>>61808487
the daily iToddler thread

the only thing I like about macOS is the GUI, it's very shiny, hopefully GNOME can catch up.

>>61809283
at least you can cook some eggs on it or boil a pot of potatoes

>>61813123
That's exactly why it's sexy. It's sexy like a beautifully designed piece of equipment, not like a piece of art drawing attention to itself. It's there to do exactly what you want it to and do it as well as it can. Nothing more, nothing less.

File: DGyANO_UwAEMlWi.jpg (215KB, 1200x816px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1200x816px

my desk is better.

>>61813455
Looks like a copy of the iMac.

Nice going Microshaft

Also
>i5 and a mobile GPU

lmfao

>>61812263
I don't, because I was one. I chose HP when it was time to get rid of my 5,1s at my business. Apple simply cannot compete.

>>61813491
>a screen looks like a screen

hmm..epic..

>>61813491
>Looks like a copy of the iMac.
It has a standard size bezel around the entire screen and a touch screen.

Where is the Mac appearance? The keyboard and mouse?

>>61808487
>apples magic keyboard still has an eject button

>>61808710
>Unified heatsink for a very toasty could and GPU
>Mediocre fin
>Blowers
>Behind a display

Either this will thottle to 500mhz or the fans will run at 10k rpm

Seriously the cooling look even worse than trashcan mac

The entire thing doesn't matter, but the color does look pretty cool.

>>61808904
>I'm the biggest fucking macfag there is but holy shit can you possibly shill any harder?

A google reverse on that image shows that you copied it from a website called https://szifon.com

Nice try, you aborted Rakesh. Now please let the gentlemen talk and you go and take a shit in your medieval backyard toilet.

>>61808735
What the fuck are you retarded?