http://www.tomshardware.com/news/x3 99-raid-threadripper-amd

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

Oh look, clickbait.

>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature
SOPA

Only reading the titles makes Wikipedia browsing a lot easier.

Fuck rAIDS. It's false security. Always backup.

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature
BRAZILIAN EDUCATION

>>61796957
RAID is for speeding up read/writes not for protecting your data.

>>61797003
you don't need more speed once you're already on nvme, that's linus-tier faggotry just for giggles

>>61796844
Reminder to report shitposters.

>>61797003
RAID-0 is not even a RAID because it is not redundant you clown.

>>61796844 (OP)
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

>>61798168
>>61798196
Haha, you guys really showed him by bumping his dead shitpost back to the first page, haha.

>>61797567
A-ha and get banned then. No thanks

>>61796957
>false security

Look at the click-bait article, it's about not being able to boot off RAID-0. That's not exactly something you use for security since it doubles the chances of losing your data.

The only raid levels I use are RAID1 for my SSD (with a spinning drive as --write-mostly) and RAID6 for storage (two of six drives die and it's gone).

RAID-0 for boot seems a bit silly - but that's just my opinion. Actually, I don't see the point in risking using it for anything unless you absolutely need the speed.

>>61799370
RAID0 is tits for huge HDD scratch disks

>>61799370
>>61799613
Kill yourselves for bumping this thread.
Retarded sacks of shit. s4g3

File: 1502192923956.png (350KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 672x794px

>>61796844
>We were also told that AMD is going to enable the feature

U M A

U M A
DELICÌA

>>61796844
>needing RAID on NVMe
>retardissimo
maybe after 5-10 years

>hardware RAID

>>61796844
this is a bunch of nothing... confirmed.

File: UMA_MACACO_STRIKE_AGAIN.png (98KB, 361x453px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 361x453px

>>61796844

>In August 2005, nVidia (how it was spelled at the time) released the nForce 4 SLI X16 chipset for the Pentium 4 in Socket LGA775. The chipset supported a whopping 40 PCI Express lanes.
>Not long after, Intel realized that Nvidia was cutting into chipset sales and stopped licensing x86 to the company.
>In the years hence, we've been stuck with 16 PCIe lanes.
Fuck Intel

File: 3.jpg (8KB, 300x295px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x295px

>>61796844

File: 4147_25_nvidia_nf200_x16_x16_vs_intel_x8_x8_p67_performance_analysis.png (24KB, 589x634px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 589x634px

>>61801997
The P67 board I'm using has an Nvidia NF200 and supports 16x/16x SLI (and 16x/16x/8x).