Are meshnets the future of the net? Where it's basically

>>61746832

It'll probably be blockchain based(ie you pay to deliver packets the more you pay the greater the speed), I wouldnt mind since it would be cheap af.

>>61748635
a blockchain system depends on free flow of data to function. if data transfer is itself a scarce resource, it will break down.

>>61746832
go back to your lain circlejerk

>>61746832
nice dream, but mesh nets are slow af

>>61746832
>not subject to government interference
Until the government mass-produces and deploys it own nodes.

Mesh isn't the answer. It's slow as fuck, and requires a ton of widespread participation.
If you want true DIY comms, use HF radio. If you just want security use encryption.

>>61746832
>Are meshnets the future of the net?
No