>he doesn't run unbotneted firefox nightly What's

I run Waterfox

>>61709427
what's so special about nightly?

I run opera, best secure browser, has VPN as a feature by default!

>>61709427
I use tails

>>61709505
>harder
>better
>faster
>stronger

File: a denial.png (86KB, 1228x545px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1228x545px

>>61709427
Chromium > Iridium > Waterfox/Icecat > Brave > Nightly/Beta meme

>>61709531
real talk, no memes? I already enabled multi process on whatever version I'm on now.

>>61709427
I do though, and Nik's Chromium.

v57 is fucking fast

it's a shame they're dropping support for most addons, though.

>>61709513
Its a proxy that doesnt encrypt the rest of your connections, just the browser. Its not as secure as you think.

https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2016/04/22/opera-browser-vpn-proxy/

>>61709596
>google cancer
no thanks.

inb4 b-but chromium has no google cancer
then why does something like ungoogled-chromium need to exist?

nightly is king

>>61709818
Firefox has google botnet too

>>61709838
Watch him say you turn it off, well I'd say to that you can do the same with Chromium too.

>>61709838
>what is about:config

>>61709850
>you can do the same with Chromium too
yeah, if you compile from source, which you clearly aren't doing if you're using nik's, nor were you suggesting a custom chromium. enjoy your google cancer

>>61709865
>what is about:config
I bet 300 dollars your about:config is a botnet garbage since you are using beta meme

File: 2017-08-03 15_17_20.jpg (25KB, 873x218px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 873x218px

>>61709878
google shills in full force today, i see. you don't even have to go to about:config for this

>>61709878
I doubt he went through and removed every Google related thing in about:config, not to mention all the Mozilla telemetry shit that has nothing to do with the few toggle boxes given in Options.. oh boy.

>>61709761
>chromium based browsers will never let you have this much control

https://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/18/a-comprehensive-list-of-firefox-privacy-and-security-settings/

>>61709913
doubt all you want, won't cure you of that google cancer. stop shilling chromium in firefox threads, no one here is falling for it. go make your own thread.

File: hmhm emoji.jpg (7KB, 224x230px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 224x230px

>mfw the latest nightly is faster than the latest chromium AND offers a shit ton of customization

um forget this privacy shit (only pedos/terrorists care really), how about we talk about the performance side of things?
does it still lag when viewing many videos/webms/flash at once? my system is beafy AF so ain't my system.
i switched to chrome for that reason, it just handles a bigger workload better were firefox basically chokes itself like shit.

File: works on my machine.png (30KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 200x193px

>>61710011
>does it still lag when viewing many videos/webms/flash at once?
never did that on my machine in the first place

>>61710033


then u were never viewing enough in the first place
multi-process thing nightly is only just getting has existed in chrome for years, mozilla is always 2 steps behind sadly...

>>61709910
>you don't even have to go to about:config for this
you are stupid
there at least 13 settings you must change in about:config to remove mozilla tracking garbage

>>61710011
why are you watching a bunch of videos at the same time?
why are you using a browser to watch videos when you can stream to an actual media player and get better quality?

>>61710101
>answering to redditors

>>61710101

because thats inconvenient AF, way to sidestep anyways i shouldnt have too do such if firefox could handle it...

>>61710125
>clicking a single button to watch in the best quality available is inconvenient

this is the state of google chrome users

>>61710125
No problems here.
And streaming is only inconvenient for the tech iliterate. Honestly, I cant go back to watching videos on my browser after seeing the quality gains.
So, how many videos are you watching at once?

>>61710176
>having to click extra shit
Autism.

>>61710191
>neo /g/
go and stay go

>>61710208
If choosing convenience over complexity is neo /g/ then so be it.

File: really serious.jpg (13KB, 217x204px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 217x204px

>>61710236
>clicking a single fucking button
>"inconvenient and complex"

this is the state of google chrome users

>>61710260
I'm not a google chrome user, I'm a chromium user, there is a difference as one is a botnet and one isn't.

>>61710236
But you only think its complex because you are tech illiterate, hence neo /g/.
You are also viewing in worse quality.

>>61710273
nice bait

>>61710273
>as one is a botnet and one isn't
if default chromium is not botnet, why does ungoogled-chromium even exist?

>>61710298
>if default chromium is not botnet, why does ungoogled-chromium even exist?
That's a paradox.

>>61710314
what are you even on about at this point? this is not a paradox, it's a simple question. i take it you've never heard of this?
https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium
it exists because default chromium is botnet and this user didn't like it. if you actually read the source and compiled it yourself, you'd know that default chromium phones home to google.

>>61709427
I run Chrome.

>>61710332


thats outdated, use nik one who use also pulls the iradium privacy changes for debotnet-ing.

>>61710101
Better question is why Firefox hasn't integrated libmpv

>>61709596
Stupid selection...

>>61710382
>use nik one who use also pulls the iradium privacy changes for debotnet-ing

Do you have a source for that?

How about a real browser debate?
Iridium vs. Icecat

>>61710182
>>61710101
How do I stream with mpc-hc or mpv?

Firefox keeps crashing for porn and youtube.

>>61709505
It has many more unfixed bugs than the releases.