Am I missing something?, Since when AMD become the darling

>>61708360
*did AMD

shoo jew

As soon as they made better CPU than Intel.

>>61708360
They did make some nice cpus this turn around. I'm sure the jew's have a good 15 year leap over amd and if not, they can use thier jewish witchcraft to talk with demons on where to go next.

>>61708420
They were too busy trying to choke AMD out of every market available for the past 10 years to make any actual CPU advantages.

botnet

>>61708400
Soooo:
i7 running properly < Ryzen burning your PC

>>61708813
>i7 running properly == burning your PC
ftfy my hebrew friend

>>61708813
you got it backwards my friend, it's intel's chips that are running hot now.
sources
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/252354-investigations-sheds-fresh-light-intels-x299-overheating-problem-implicates-skylake-xs-design-well
https://tech4gamers.com/intel-core-i9-7900x-is-even-hot-with-1000-euros-cooling-system/
http://hexus.net/tech/news/mainboard/107437-renowned-overclocker-dubs-intel-x299-platform-vrm-disaster/

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>61709236
SIR PLEASE DELET

>>61708360
There are tons of AMD fanboys, rooting for the underdog, wishing for a return to glory.

I am one. My main system hasn't been AMD since socket 939. It just hasn't been the smart choice for builds. I did buy a 5050e for a specific low power application, but that was a very narrow window of AMD has something that's good for a specific purpose; and that window closed quickly.

I'm so fucking pleased to be able to build an AMD system again.

>>61708360
AMD Marketing has been brigading /g/. It's annoying as fuck, but meh it could be worse.

>>61709965
I wouldn't be surprised if there was Intel Internet Defense Forces on here too

>>61710053
Intel, and nvida buys commercials, and/or adspace. AMD gives a few mouth breathers on leddit some hardware with trips to hawaii, and 20 cent per comment pajeets to push their products through muh social media.

>>61710097
that not all intel does
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osSMJRyxG0k

>>61710113
this

>>61709821
honestly the only reason why i support amd is because any sort of competition benefits the consumer

>>61710113
What is the video about? Asking for those that don't click on youtube videos.

>>61710350
basically its about how intel spent a lot of shill bucks to try and undermine amd and at the same time create a monopoly

>>61708360
Since they started making CPU's better than intel.

>>61709965
>>61710053

the only 2 companies that compete on the cpu market dont have paid shills?

ofc they have especially on reddit /r/amd is full of idiots that constantly downvote anything that you provide as a source and its against intel

>>61710350
>>61710381
also, because they barely had any competition, there werent any big innovations in the cpu market which caused them to release minuscule upgrades each year

>Should I /g/ join red team+ /g/?
Want to be Red Team Plus? Tell us your Red Team Story
https://community.amd.com/message/2738767
Will they give me free stuff to shill for them?

>>61708360
Since Intel has stagnated since Haswell and has just been trying to shove iGPUs and meme tier AVX extensions down our throats.

Zen is not really much if at all beyond Haswell, but that's close enough that MOAR COARS at low prices is very compelling.

>>61710350
It's catalogs all of Intel's anti-competitive, and general bullying behavior since the 80s.
mp4 for you.


https://mega.nz/#!yUVklITR!nRdLgSWAt0V2PMop5QjhqaIFOmNKu8nQCa7jsd2doMw

>>61708360
intel is best because it gives more 5fps in gaming

the rest doesnt matter

>>61710509
kaby lake tier ryzen is haswell tier cpu..

got it..

>>61708360
http://wccftech.com/intel-6-core-coffee-lake-i7-8700k-i5-8600k/
A single cycle of AMD actually being competitive in the high-end market made this shit happen.
Let this sink in for a second. All AMD had to do is release a six core with SMTfor 200 bucks and a native quad core with high IPC for 100, and Intel is already cannibalising Kaby Lake and its entire Xeon lineup by announcing QUAD CORE i3S (with SMT) and six core base model i7s (with lower TDP and higher clockspeeds than the overpriced Kaby Lake six cores to boot). In other words, Intel just revealed that they have been jewing the entire consumer market for the last 5 years, and have finally decided that some real innovation is in order. And all it took was AMD finally discovering SMT.
In other words, without AMD we would all be eating Intel's shit till Quantum computing finally became a thing or ARM usurped x86 or something.
That's why we love AMD. Intel are jews and without AMD they'd do nothing but rape our wallets for as long as they possibly could.
And then there's the fact that AMD would be the dominant company by now anyway if Intel wasn't bribing OEMs with billions all through the 2000's. In other words, avoid giving money to Intel whenever possible, they'll make money off of the normies who don't build anyway, and AMD needs all the marketshare it can get when they're losing money hand over fist and only get pennies every time they beat Intel in court over Intel's shitty anti-consumer practices (and Intel always loses those suits, even though they prolong them in the appeals courts as much as possible).

>>61711018
Intel would still be using Netburst if Athlon wasn't a thing.

>>61710701
Yeah, and KL = Haswell tier plus 5-10%.
We're very nearly in the same spot we were 5 years ago, if you're looking at int IPC in real world applications.

>>61711018
Keep in mind this is all still rumors.

>>61711113
If Athlon wasn't a thing, we'd be using [email protected] GHz Itaniums that cost $599.99.

>>61711018
>A single cycle of AMD actually being competitive in the high-end market made this shit happen.
No.
A single generation of AMD being noncompetitive and Intel having an incompetent CEO has caused Intel to lay back and try to push into markets where it has no reason being. Like the mobile market.
They neglected to assume AMD is the threat they have always been.

>>61711177
the reason for AMD not being competitive was due to intel fucking with them, see
>>61710113
or >>61710514 if you don't want to jewtube

>>61710594
Stuttering because of shit frametimes also doesnt matter
Average framerate is the only important thing to exist

>>61710222
Is it really benefiting?
All they did was force "moar cores" instead of the slow and steady improvement in IPC with quad cores.
Enjoy games and applications having a core count requirement in the future.

>>61711341
the point is to get intel shitting bricks because amd is cutting into their profits, forcing them to innovate and lowering prices of their cpus , which is good for the consumer

>>61711341
Games already have core requirements. Farcry won't even launch if it doesn't detect 4 threads. And we need multi-cores to become inexpensive or else Moore's law is going to start kicking in hardcore, since it's doubtful whether or not we can go smaller than 14nm without moving to graphene or some shit, and that leap will be very expensive when it happens.
And without the looming threat of AMD, Intel sure as hell wouldn't be offering quad-thread Pentiums by now. Let alone planning native quad-core i3s.
And it's not like we're losing out on the IPC improvements, if anything we're also getting better speeds and better TDP on top of them if the rumours for Coffee Lake are to be believed.
Intel had this technology and they can offer it cheaply, make no mistake about it. All they need is the right motivation.
Without AMD all they'd be looking after would be their already massive profit margins.

>>61711498
*Moore's is going to start diminishing hardcore. Got a bit confused there.

>>61708813
You been living under a rock?

Intel is having overheating problems AT STOCK.

>>61708360
AMD is crap. Avoid like plague. Bunch of happy non-AMD users on linux can even have some fun with wine.

>>61711712
Get back in the cuckshed, Brian.

>>61712625
Call me when you can play half the games nvidia users can, AMDfag.

>>61712769
>Posts about NVidia in an Intel vs AMD thread
>Implying AMD GPUs flat out can't play games NVidia GPUs can
You're one of those special stupids, aren't you?

>>61712786
>Implying AMD GPUs flat out can't play games NVidia GPUs can
Correct. They can't. AMD's linux 'support' is abysmal. That's why I said AMD is crap under linux. Goes for their CPUs as well. Now, if you weren't a smug little douchebag that actually bothered to read my first post instead of trying to look smart...

File: 1430460027689.png (450KB, 812x720px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 812x720px

>>61712877
>Gaming
>Linux
>Fucking around with WINE

>>61711241
Intelcucks are truly braindead

>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Locked platform features don't matter!
>*NEW* Synthetic loads don't matter!
>*NEW* Burnt pins don't matter!