>Coffee Lake i3 4 cores 8 threads THANK YOU BASED INTEL

Someone fucking nuke fucking CPU & GPU threads.

>>61705532
Nice! AMD is finished. RIP.

Also will Coffee Lake support Z170?

>>61705547
>Also will Coffee Lake support Z170?
>he doesn't know
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

>>61705547

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>61705543
>Someone fucking nuke fucking CPU & GPU threads.
mods really ought to ban this shit. or confine it all into a single thread.
all these gaymer manchildren have destroyed /g/ with this shit.

>>61705543
This

an i3 will run 8 threads
an i5 will run 6 threads
an i7 will run 12 threads

market segmentation has gone too far

>>61705565
>>61705580

https://mobile.twitter.com/ASRockInfo/status/891872117972545537

ASRock deleted that tweet.

So they were wrong.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>61705628
>mobile
>CPU shitposting thread
Holy fuck mods do something.

>>61705543
>>61705582

>t.terryfag
>t.private tracker general

>>61705640
https://www.twitter.com/ASRockInfo/status/891872117972545537

Here you go.

URL parsed for desktop users.


Still, they deleted it because z170 IS supported via BIOS updates.

AMD BTFO.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>61705678
Anything, even cult of schizo is better than hardware wars.

>>61705532
i7-6700K buyers got cucked desu.

>>61705628
gigabyte confirmed it too, asrock probably got roasted by intel for breaking nda.

>>61705678
fighting over few percent of CPU speed and few frames in some retarded gfayme and constantly posting about "X being finished" is the most retarded thing ever. it's seriously dumb beyond words. you should be fucking ashamed and question your life.

>>61705684
bullying a schizo is not even related to fucking technology, at least this has actual computer hardware as a main discussion point even if it is inane.

>>61705688
>gigabyte confirmed it too
Sauce?

>>61705712
Schizos are not technology. Torrents are not technology either, they have their place in >>>/t/. CPUs and video cards ARE technology. So kindly fuck off, you stinking pajeet.

>>61705687
Just OC the 6700k to 4.5Ghz like me and enjoy good performance.

>>61705712
you must be pretty gnu if you think /g/ is anything other than

Firefox vs chome
my ide vs your ide
loonix vs wanglows
anything vs fucking anything

>>61705739
GPUs and mainstream CPUs belong to /v/.
Kindly fuck off, Rajeesh.

>>61705712
You're finished.

>>61705751
Fuck off back to /ptg/, paki

>>61705758
Paджит, плec.

>>61705751
>GPUs and CPUs belong to /v/
How new are you?

>>61705751
I use mainstream GPUs and mainstream CPUs and I never gayme.

However, my PC makes me a lot of money in 3D.

Does that mean I should post in /v/?

Go fuck a goat you stinky poojeet.

>>61705543
>>61705582
How quickly would /g/ get axed without Intel, AMD, and Nvidia threads

>>61705726
it was on their forums and got removed shortly after too.

Intel may have changed their mind after seeing R5 so it's not confirmed, might still get 4c on the socket, not sure about the 6c.

>>61705532
REALLY FAST I3

NO REASON TO BUY I7 NOW

>>61705532
Transparent window borders?

>>61705607
6 cores 6 threads will be faster than 4 cores 8 threads

holy shit, my wallet is ready.
that tasty toasty core i7
My compiling times will be crushed from minutes to seconds.

>>61706703
i'm really hyped about the i3s
if they really make it 4c/8t it will be the best gaming cpu under $150 and it will crush any amd competition

so pentium will get quad core?
nice!!

THANKS AMD FOR THE COMPETITION...
NOW I CAN UPGRADE MY HASWELL..

>>61706763
holy shit, you are right

>>61706774
If pentiums really get 4C/4T, it's going to make R3 look really bad.

>>61705532
Take in count that Coffee Lake will not be compatible with kaby and sky lake chipsets regardless of they using the same socket so you'll have to buy a new motherboard, meanwhile the future Ryzen 7 2800x 7nm will be compatible with AM4 and Zen 1 chipsets.

>>61706852
i didn't buy ryzen yet and i don't have a kaby/skylake cpu so i don't really give a shit

>>61706852
why would you have to take any of that into account when the source for the """""leak""""" is "Chinese forums" and that intel would never give anyone a 7700k at i3 prices if their lives depended on it?

>>61706852
And Ryzen 7 3800x 7nm+ will also be compatible with AM4 and Zen 1 chipsets ;)

>>61706894
and everyone will complain how it Zen 3 doesn't support DDR5 which is will be finalized 2018 and reach mainstream 2020

>>61706917
Zen 2 is coming out in 2018 and Zen 3 is coming out in 2019, by 2020 AMD will probably have AM5 ready with DDR5 and PCI Express 4.0 support.

>>61706892
we already know that the i5 will be 6c/6t so it's basically confirmed that it will be faster than a 7700k

>>61706935
Then I'm sorry for the suckers that bought Zen 1 with only half an year lifetime.

>>61706945
so the i3s need to be 4 cores because otherwise it would make little to no sense
the question is if they make them 8 threads or not

>>61706947
Zen2 is Q4 2018 at best.

>>61706947
Sorry for the suckers that bought z270 with only six months lifetime.

File: [BakedFish] ViVid Strike! - 04 [720p][AAC].mp4_snapshot_12.22_[2016.10.26_00.20.37].jpg (91KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1280x720px

>>61705532
>tfw you bought an i5 a year ago

>>61705532
enjoy your new socket cucks

>>61706947
It's not like Zen1 stops yo function when Zen 2 comes out. Its soldered after all.

My sandy bridge is still fine and perfecly does anything i want from it.

>>61706974
now i'm really happy i didn't buy any cpus since 2010

>>61706977
It's even worse, Intel is going to use the same socket but it will not be compatible with older chipsets (z170 and z270).

If it don't have hyperthreading whats the point?
Also when did they stop putting hyperthreading in i5s?
My i5 3320m has hyperthreading but apparently newer i5s dont, and it's only in i7s? wtf (((intel))))

>>61706998
the worst part is that it will have the same tdp with much lower clocks effectivelly killing their purpose lol

>>61705813
Oh yeah. Quickly. Take it as a sacrifice to our normie overlords

>>61707001
>Also when did they stop putting hyperthreading in i5s?
Desktop i5s never had HT.

File: 1471202017627.png (168KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 400x400px

>Coffee Lake will be 14nm
>mfw this is the fourth time Intel uses 14nm

File: Screenshot from 06-07-2017 19_12_35.png (36KB, 571x556px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 571x556px

>>61707104
Don't worry pal, their 10nm node is a total disaster.
Just look at the fucking mask count.

>>61707104
No no goy, it's 14nm++.

>>61707087
>Desktop i5s never had HT.
maybe that's where my confusion is. Do mobile i5s still have HT, or did they discontinue that and save it for i7s

>>61706640
Nah it'll be roughly the same as long as all 8 threads are being utilised and same single core performance.

>>61707148
They do. Basically the only difference between i5s and i7s in mobile is that the latter are higher clocked. Except for the specific quadcore parts. Intel's naming convention in the mobile space is confusing as fuck, doubly so because it doesn't really have anything to do with how they name their desktop CPUs except higher is better.

>>61705543
this

>>61707148
Mobile "i5" is 2/4.

>>61707104
4th time?
Sky+Kaby+Coffee=3
Retard.

>>61707184
You forgot Broadwell you dipshit.

File: w_500.jpg (37KB, 500x327px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x327px

>>61705547

You need a Z370 board for Coffee Lake

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

File: WdWJLnu.jpg (81KB, 596x544px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 596x544px

>>61707184
>Being this retarded

>>61707187
and plus the z87 socket 1150
literally the same shit

>>61705628

Intel bullied them for accidentally breaking NDA.

Notice how Intel hasn't corrected the record regarding the Coffee Lake not supported on 100 and 200 series motherboards.

Do you realize all Intel mainboard manufacturers are sitting on hundreds of thousands of unsold Intel mainboards because consumers are getting tired of having 500 different motherboards to choose from.

>>61706640
Have you seen the 1600 vs 7800 reviews and the like?

While the 6 cores do better in productivity they both still lose to the 7700K in gaming.

So it's quite possible that i3's will now beat i5's and i7's in gaming simply because they seem optimized for 4/8 configs.

I could be wrong though, it may just be an architecture optimization issue, and they'll do better. It will be interesting to see though.

>>61707148

notebook core i7 are 2core/4thread. They are only 4 core/4thread if they have "HQ" in their name or something like that

clusterfuck to say the least kek

>>61707163
i7 HK/HQ/EQ - 4c/8t
i7 U/Y - 2c/4t

i5 HQ/EQ - 4c/4t
i5 U/Y - 2c/4t

i3 H/U - 2c/4t

Kaby Lake Refresh / Coffee Lake:
i5 U - 4c/8t

What did Intel mean by this

>>61707228
>because they seem optimized for 4/8 configs.
I still don't get why that's the case since consoles are 8 cores.

>>61707413
Consoles reserve cores for console OS and other tasks.
You're most likely going to get 6 cores or so allocated to games.

They are low low performance and low clocked cores.

Heck I'm not even sure if the Jaguar cores are full cores or bulldozer shit.

A 4C8T cpu with high IPC will make up the difference with sheer clockspeed/IPC/HT/SMT

>>61707478
>Heck I'm not even sure if the Jaguar cores are full cores or bulldozer shit.
They're full cores, but designed for netbooks and other low-power stuff. Comparable to atoms, pretty much.

>>61707478
Jaguar cores are full cores. Construction cores =/= cat cores.

>>61707228
they will just cut the l3 cache on i3 to make it slower in games
my dream intel line up are basically ryzens but by intel
>pentium 4c/4t
>i3 4c/8t
>i5 6c/12t
>i7 8c/16t
>tfw this will not happen

>>61706974
Entire /g/ has warned you: wait for Ryzen.

>>61707515
By the time that might happen (Icelake) Intel will be mercilessly crushed by Zen2.

>>61707515
Wait for Tiger Lake ™

>>61707528
>wait for something that comes out in eight months and might or might not be good when you need a pc right now

How about no.

Does this mean we will have

2C/4T Celerons
4C/4T Pentiums?

Will 2C/2T finally cease to exist? Or will low end Celerons get 2C/2T?

>>61707583
maybe the cheapest celeron will be 2c/2t for the ultra poorfags

>>61705532
>posting botneet

w10 E LTSB or SHUT UP!

>>61705628
>>61705680
What's funny?

>>61707574
> when you need a pc right now
> posts tfw when better product comes out in a year
I can't follow your logic

File: 1499048048559.jpg (66KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 320x240px

>>61705547

>>61707630
It still hurts all the same. I wouldn't have minded waiting if my old shit hadn't died.

>>61707574
Ryzen is out since quite some time now.

I hopped on the 1231 V3 bandwagon, and everything these days kills it.

If I only had ponied up for a 4770K instead, I'd least be able to keep up.

>>61707649
i understand you, back then no one would have thought that AMD can do something good after all the bulldozers and other rx400s

>>61707665
I'm talking about early summer 2016 here.

>>61707665
>Ryzen is out since quite some time now.
Ryzen has been out for quite some time now.

Lrn2engrish, Pajeet.

>>61707528
Ryzen sucks tho
>lots of cores but limited to dual channel ram
>can't clock higher than 4.1ghz
>crap performance if the benchmarking tool hasn't been optimized for it
>needs fast ram, the right OS settings, hyper threading disabled/enabled for the best performance

>>61707701
Hiring all those english majors really paid off for intel

>>61707771
>complains about dual channel ram on regular consumer CPUs
>MUH CLOCKSPEED 5GIGAHURTZ MEANS ITS BETTER
>day one benchmarks
>still day one benchmarks

>>61707771
>lots of cores but limited to dual channel ram
wat
the Ryzen Threadrippers has quad channel support
>can't clock higher than 4.1ghz
Doesn't really matter since performance seems to scale with RAM clocks.

>>61705543
>ITT AUTISM

File: 1501274983756.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>61707684
J I M K E L L E R

>>61705532
more like skylake-x is finished. Why would you ever buy the $600 8 core when you can get a higher clocked 6 core for only $300

>>61708169
What the hell is going on in that webm? What's the orange thing for?

>>61708169
where's the thermal paste glob

>>61708169
I wonder how long that piece of plastic will last...
A lot of "green eco friendly" plastics fail spectacularly within a short amount of time these days, and that one's going to be somewhere hot all the time.

>>61708195
This is how you can rip threads

>>61705758
stop fighting niggers

>>61706852
If "complete" you mean no optane support or any other shitty gimmick in the last 1.5 years Intel shat out, I'm totally fine with that.

Riddle me this
If i3 is 4/8, i7 is 6/12, then what is i5?

>>61705740
I mean you get the same (maybe even better) performance on a fuckjbg i3 . unless Intel decides to not release unlocked i3s

>>61708269
6/6

>>61708278
Doesn't make any sense, 4/8 can perform better than 6/6 in certain situations

It's not going to be overclockable
It's going to cost shittons

>>61707001
It's a mobile i5, which means it's a c2d essentially

>>61708289
>Doesn't make any sense
Neither does any of Intel's decisions since AMD released Zen.

>>61708269
high end (overclockable) quadcores and low end 6 cores

>>61708310
That's too retarded even for shintel, 3/6 is the best case scenario you could hope for

How do I blur taskbar and windows titlebars like that?

>>61708289
explain

>>61708347
some gaymes scale really well with HT, which may put 8 threads ahead of 6 real cores

File: intel pin.jpg (16KB, 355x355px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 355x355px

>>61708206
At least it's not on a place where you get constant mechanical stress, like a certain other company solution.

>>61708372
AAAAAAAAAAAAARGH

File: 21107293889998_609_m[1].jpg (10KB, 255x156px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 255x156px

>>61708372
Intel push pins are literally designed to be installed and not touched after that.

They actually sell these things that replaces the push pins for the stock cooler.

>>61708372
I had those break on one of my older PCs.

>>61708372
those things are absolutely fucking retarded and the "designer" should be shot in the fucking head

>>61708372
these break every single time i do anything with the cooler

>>61705628
>https://mobile

>>61708369
If games is all you care about, then you should be happy that cheapest variation is now best suited for you

File: Laughing Tsuruya.jpg (59KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 300x300px

>>61707132
>1Q-17

>>61708206

my mobo came with one for my intel cpu. it gets really warm but i haven't seen anything melt yet

>>61708541
>Risk Production

>>61708544
>Intel
Irrelevant as video shown in Thread Ripper.

>>61708535
>4c/8t only for gaming
they will be good overall processors and probably way better than ryzen 1600/older i3s in gaming
i REALLY hope this turns out to be true

>>61708520
Just buy more!

This was already confirmed to be a fake.
Jews BTFO

>>61708575
fuck
i guess that means i will be waiting for the series after coffee lake or just buy zen+/zen2 if it's better in games

>tfw bought a 7700k 5 months ago
Fuck you, Jewtel. I basically have an i3 now.

>>61708191
Consumer market for $500+ cpus is almost non existent anyway.

>>61705532
>R&D Experiment System

Ha. Good one.

File: Intel-Coffee-Lake-4[1].jpg (173KB, 1194x636px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1194x636px

>2 cores
>95W TDP

>>61708561
7700k is already bad overall CPU, even 4790k was bad overall CPU. But I guess it depends on what you don't do on your PC.

>>61705757
>No u
Great response.

https://videocardz.com/71660/intel-coffee-lake-architecture-brings-6-core-at-95w-tdp

THANK YOU BASED INTEL

still no reason to upgrade from [email protected]

>>61708673
what a fucking mess
that means there will basically be 3 versions of 1151

>>61708604
That's how it should have been for the last 10 years, if intel didn't have a monopoly.

>>61708673
>No H or B chipsets this year
Oh god, Intel is done and finished

File: 1497851175425.jpg (26KB, 440x586px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 440x586px

>>61707132
Can someone tell me what I'm meant to take from this graph?

>>61708845
>/g/ - Technology
Anyway, it compares feature sizes, mask count, vmin and availability of several nodes from different foundries.

>>61708845
>brainlets

>>61708860
Yeah but is it meant to be saying that Intel got btfo somehow?

>>61708870
Yes, just look as SRAM density, vmin and mask count.
Their 10nm node is total trash, a late one at that.

>>61705532
who cares about the new cpu
what about the aero effect on the pic

>leak from Baidu shit
>ES with the full product name?
FAKE AS FUCK

>World of Warcraft was originally designed for 1 core and can now use 2 threads
Why would I ever use this thing?

File: 1500735024501.gif (365KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2000x1153px

>>61705532

>>61708845
If you want the simple brainlet explanation, look at the Relative mask count number.
The smaller, the more shit you can shove on the same space, thus the better.

>>61708933

>games without motion blur

WoW is choppy as shit on my 144hz monitor because there's no motion blur when spinning the camera around

fuck Blizzard

File: 1500260377912.jpg (96KB, 638x710px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 638x710px

>>61708575
>>61708909
>>61708937
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>61708941
That... doesn't have anything to do with the relative mask count. Relative mask count is about how difficult/expensive the process is.

>>61708949
If a camera sweep feels choppy it usually means you have inconsistant frametimes, hardcap your framerate with Nvidia Inspector or Rivatuner.

>>61708909

Please delete this post.

File: 1487142949075.png (17KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 882x758px

>mfw intel hasn't released a statement on AssRock's tweet about Coffee Lake needing a new motherboard and is not supported on 100 and 200 series mainboards

>>61708964
>renamed 4790
>HUR DUE ITS REAL GUYS
Fuck off favela macaco

File: 1481149316342.jpg (132KB, 882x731px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 882x731px

hmm


4790k here when it first debuted, guess come 2020 i will upgrade to a 12c24t behemoth.

>>61706974
>tfw you bought a 2500k at launch and have no regretts

File: mvdtn8N.jpg (210KB, 1888x1320px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1888x1320px

>>61705532
you should thank AMD because if Ryzen 3 didn't exist Coffee Lake i3s would have been 2-core shit yet

File: 1500551935194.png (386KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1000x1000px

>>61707771

File: 1487297768743.jpg (125KB, 960x878px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 960x878px

>>61709005
SHUT UP STUPID GOY

>>61707771

Tell me about a delicacy from your country.

>>61707830
>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Locked platform features don't matter!
>*NEW* Synthetic loads don't matter!
>*NEW* Burnt pins don't matter!

Intelcucks 2017

>>61707679
>>61709016
>tfw bought a Xeon E3 1245V2 but the MSI Z77 motherboard had recently suffered a VRM failure which killed the Xeon

>>61709138
Multi-core in many cases does not matter indeed.
But when your single core performance depends entirely on your toaster toasting toasts instead of having an competitive IPC, it's kinda like being on the brink of the abyss.
Specially when your rival have quite the potential to increase the IPC as it's a brand new arch, versus your quickly aging 10 year old rerashed shit that you rode because "muh manufacturing process advantage".

>>61709100
MACACO SOPA

File: macaco.jpg (30KB, 216x250px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 216x250px

>>61709201

>>61705532
Good, AMD will cut even more the price of ryzen. I will buy the 1700x then.

So tired of this macaco sopa already...

>>61709261
Blame the BR shitposter.

GAYMD BTFO'd

AYMD NOW FINISHED AND BANKRUPT!

>>61707132
>7nm LP

is LP standing for low power or leading power?

>>61710009
Leading Performance. It's IBM-speak.

>>61710034
thank you, anon.
Please finish the job IBM, burn them all.

>>61705532
>AMD release processor
>Intel turn i7 into i3 in a single refresh after years of 4 core 8 thread i7 stagnation
Damn, thanks for coming back AMD

>>61710059
Oh, they will. With POWER9+, a housefire we've never seen before.

>>61705543
This would please me greatly. There's almost no real tech discussion. Just a bunch of fanboys waving their red/green/blue peens all over the place.

File: t.JUSTnich.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>61710082
OY!

File: ddda.png (35KB, 362x435px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 362x435px

>>61705532
really fires my oven

>>61707001
only dual core i5s get HT

>>61710422
HOW?
It's $1k CPU.

>>61707228
The 1600s already match the 7700k at lower CPU clocks when paired with 3200 ram. Ryzen scales with ram speed

>>61708195
>>61708206
The orange slides into a rail on the CPU tray so you never have to handle the sides of CPU or pins. Also plastic melts at 350 degrees and survives under car hoods for a long time

>>61705547
It's like Intel is forcing me to go amd
fuck you Intel I believe on you
Now this fucking z370

If toy rupee is good with gayming I gonna discard you fuck

>>61710610
There is good plastic and bad plastic. Eco green crap plastic cracks, flakes and disintegrates in only a few years, the bad thing is that a lot of new shit uses the bad plastic.

>>61705821
Anyway I bet it's same pinning and shit.
Even z170 have better vrm colling than skx, and they can handle power on those 6 cores, heck official tdp is 95w.

Intel is just jewing to force purchase of new boards. Board vendors are interested too, it's new sales

>>61707328
It means finally ultra low power CPUs will have 4 cores. That is to deal with ryzen

Yeah, I guess I'll be limping along with my E3 1231 V3 until all this clusterfuck is sorted out.

Maybe I should just skip DDR4 altogether, current DDR4 prices have gone up so much, fucking goys not ramping up chip production.

Regularly going over 20GBs of my 32GB memory so next build will be at least 64GB.

>>61710694
It should be stuff designed for wide temperatures considering it sits on a cpu, epyc is going to use the same stuff and I doubt enterprise will take that shit. And if they want to save money on plastic why not save it on indium solder as well.

File: kekekekek.png (1023KB, 728x1232px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 728x1232px

m-muh buy babbylake-x now and upgrade to Skylel-X later..!

https://videocardz.com/71647/intel-core-i3-8300-spotted-with-four-cores-and-eight-threads

>Update: According to the poster from NGA, the original image is from Tieba Baidu, in other words, it might be fake.

In other words, it's definitely fake. "R&D Experiment System" are you fucking kidding me? Who the fuck believes this shit?

>>61705687
i got i7-6700K
But I'll upgrade to i7-8700k with Z370 anyway.

>>61705532
Fucking Intel and AMD marketing teams you faggots have to stop bombarding us with this threads, the truth is that ARM is the superior arch and you both are getting irrelevant

>>61710485
I need one. I already put it once into my basket but just couldnt justify buying it before my payday later this month

>4C/8T
>$400
>1GHz
Top KEK

>>61711575

What the fuck are Intel thinking by releasing a fucking 4C/4T i5 HEDT processor when they are gonna release a 4C/8T i3 in a couple of months?

Will we start seeing yearly HEDT chipset upgrades like we do on Intel mainstream? X399 Intel, now with support for 8th generation core i3 processors? Uwot

File: delid this.png (334KB, 679x702px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 679x702px

>>61705628
>ASRock deleted that tweet.
>So they were wrong.
Keep telling yourself that, buddy.

>>61710636
spotted the favela monkey

>>61705532
>not compatible with 2XX motherboards
>doing a new build with an expensive motherboard centered around an i3
kek

A socket a year keeps the goys away

>>61707243
Mobile "HQ" I7 are 4c/8t tho
http://ark.intel.com/products/97185/Intel-Core-i7-7700HQ-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz

>>61705628
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

maybe z270 is supported with bios updates

File: 1501684855430.jpg (45KB, 960x603px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 960x603px

>>61715528
This being said by the guys that make the motherboards, probably not.

>>61705532
confirmed fake you moron
enjoy Intels milk