Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: Capture.jpg (33KB, 512x342px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 512x342px
> Read news about red hat "deprecating" btrf because its "hard" to "maintain".
> Wonder how red hat plans to add cow support for the docker fan club.
> zfs? overlayfs? aufs?
> They start writing their our own.
> From scratch.
> In Rust and Python.
"This is also a chance to learn from the benefits and shortcomings of existing solutions. We
should not just copy ZFS." Great.
"This is made possible by a hybrid, userspace-based approach." Better.
Section "2.2 Building upon existing projects" Evaluates existing projects but only mentions xfs and device-mapper. Perfect.
https://stratis-storage.github.io/
>>
I'm a systems guy, but I generally work higher up the stack these days. Whats this going to get me? Will this eventually be the default rhel file system? Does this replace lvm?
>>
>>61703978
Perhaps an updated xfs which replaces lvm.
>>
I heard they hired on Terry Davis to lead the project.
>>
>>61704436
I'm sure Terry could come up with something better.
Not that he ever would.
>>
File: 1498510540414.jpg (109KB, 823x744px) Image search:
[Google]
109KB, 823x744px
I really hate all of that bs what redhat is doing right now.
The current gnu/linux status is deplorable.
>>
File: Screenshot_2017-08-03_00-17-42.png (135KB, 1816x719px) Image search:
[Google]
135KB, 1816x719px
>>61703800
ZFS 0.7.0-1 stable is live.
You know what you must do.
>>
>>61703800
Are you being obtuse or are you just retarded? They're using XFS, which was already the default filesystem and has been since 2014 (and has been available since like 2010). There's no plan to start using Stratis yet, because it's not even out. It won't be finished and available for years and it's targeted towards their enterprise customers.
>>
>>61705145
>targeted towards their enterprise customers
That's what the E in red hat enterprise linux stands for. What distribution are you talking about?
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3