>Top most vulnerable software are all free and open source

>>61660611
That's because you can actually look inside the code. There are probably thousands more for Windows that no one knows about.

>>61660611
>code actually gets looked at
>vulnerabilities get found
makes sense tbdesu

>vulnerability found
>gets reported properly
>patched in 2 hours
You're leaving this part out.

>>61660811
Sure thing pal. You mean like that time that Linus fixed a vulnerability and then reverted it and then it lasted 9 years until it was actually fixed? Cool story.

>>61660653
>>61660664
So you're admitting that open sores is less secure?

>>61661635
are you stupid ?

File: vodka.png (169KB, 575x446px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 575x446px

At least I don't have to wait years for Micro$oft to fix it

given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow

>>61660996
A 20-YEAR-OLD PRINTER VULNERABILITY LEFT WINDOWS EXPOSED TO MALWARE
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/20-year-old-windows-printer-bug/

19-YEAR-OLD VULNERABILITY DISCOVERED IN WINDOWS OS
http://www.mortimersmythe.com/about-mortimer-smythe-designs/blog/373-windows-bug

18-year-old SMB vulnerability resurfaces, dozens of vendors affected
http://www.csoonline.com/article/2908476/vulnerabilities/18-year-old-smb-vulnerability-resurfaces-dozens-of-vendors-affected.html

Windows has a 17 year old un-patched vulnerability
https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-has-a-17-year-old-un-patched-vulnerability

15-year-old bug allows malicious code execution in all versions of Windows
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/02/15-year-old-bug-allows-malicious-code-execution-in-all-versions-of-windows/

Because in that table Windows versions are separately counted.

If you look at the CVSS Score Distribution it shows Microsoft has more serious CVEs than anyone else, by far.

https://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-vendor-cvssscore-distribution.php

dont forget that openssh just had a 0day RCE released to the devs, get ready for some patchin!