Give me a GOOD reason for why I should stop using clang. Pro-tip:

Easy. GCC makes code faster.

>>61623859
>>61623884

Real programs aren't written in C.

proprietary compiler plugins don't respect your freedom

>>61623944
>C++
ftfy

C is a great language for small apps, which have to be fast, but C++ is better for enterprise programs: Adobe CC, Visual Studio etc.

>>61624044
You realize the most complex, biggest software is written in C, right?

>>61623884
By a margin that doesn't matter for almost everything. And not necessarily for every software.

>>61624070
Meanwhile, what advantages does Clang/LLVM have?

>>61624064
By that you better don't mean the Linux kernel.

>>61624002
You're wrong. No one has to use plugins or extensions, and it's better that way.

>>61624092
Why?

>>61624091
Better integration in other tools.
I'd say faster compilation, but I don't think that is true, anymore.

>>61624104
Because it is already a catastrophe and the biggest parts are drivers, where you better don't look to closely, even with all the costly amounts of auditing and code review going on.

>>61624091
https://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html
https://clang.llvm.org/features.html

>>61624108
What integration and what tools?