>apple have patented behind screen camera Apple way ahead

File: 1501307047247.png (161KB, 422x357px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 422x357px

>>61621391
>Way ahead of the curve
>Used the same design for three models
Also friendly reminder to sage and report shill threads

>>61621391
>behind screen camera
u wot? for what purpose and how does that even work?

>>61621391
>apple nigger shit
No need, I've already saged.

>>61621626
For maximising screen to phone ratio.

File: 1317464430091.jpg (12KB, 472x472px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 472x472px

>>61621391
>way ahead of the curve
>no headphone jack

File: 1491188957634.gif (617KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 498x498px

Have smartphones reached the end of useful innovations?
Manufacturers seems to be grasping as straws now, coming up with stupid gimmicks that don't really add anything.

sage and report shill threads

File: 1497630847227.png (281KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 666x666px

>>61621391
>no standard auxiliary jack

>by definition, below standard

>>61621691
yeah but screen stuff makes shit lens cover. shit quality light getting into campera

>>61621702
The samsung dex dock idea was pretty neat. The endgame for smartphones is to replace the average consumer pc or laptop. Itll be awhile before that happens though.

>>61621391
>way ahead of the curve
>removed headphones jack
>average battery capacity
>bezels
>muh lightweight bullshit
>shitty specs and software
>screen cracks when you drop your iPhone from few centimetres
>appstore is filled with nothing but garbage
>repairing cost more that the device

>>61621626
It is actually a really good idea. You can look directly at the eye at the person when skype-ing

>>61621766
yeah but even cheap lenses are shit for image quality, so how is letting light through a screen not going to be shit?

>>61621391
Source?

>>61621820
I don't know how they did it, or even if they did it or op is just memeing,

>>61621820
Presumably they have a filter in the camera's software that can compensate for the added light from the screen pixels.

So if there's a lot of blue on screen, the camera could leech any blue the pixels might have back-shined into the lens and offset the image to a correct representation.

>>61621978
>the added light
no, I mean impure shit in front of a lens.

I'm going to assume they turm off pixels when the camera is active and use OLED, so turned off pixels are transparent. but still the plastic that the screen is made out of, is going to ruin light for camera picture quality

>>61621766
Exactly what I was thinking