What features would /g/'s perfect language have? compiled

There's no perfect language, there never will be a perfect language. Different tasks require different tools. Like hanging yourself, that would require a rope. You understand where I'm going with this?

C but with standardized polymorphism, a decent stdlib with atomics, standard sized ints, ipc, networking and namespaces.
>inb4 you mean C++ ?

it's pretty much go or limbo

Clearly the best programming language would allow you to program the language to how you want it to be.

>>61608864
t. greenhorn programmer
that is literally the worst kind of language because you would encourage eternal fragmentation.
mcfucking kys tech illiterate.

>>61608862
go with no gc that worked on bare metal would be the best language ever no debate.
>inb4 muh rust

>>61608829
General purpose language, with the widest possible use cases, for most jobs, instead of switching between languages.

Of course, I mean a language of today's standards. not "perfect" in that sense.

>>61608864
>>61608910

>>61608829
You do realise Python actually exists?

>>61608878
Kek

The perfect language would solve the fragmentation by fragmenting the configuration of how its run per fragment.

But sure, we're talking about only practical languages in a perfect language thread.

Lua

>>61608852
no classes/struct member functions?
what about templates?

>>61609624
>templates
kill yourself

>>61608852
basically c with javas object system, and library.

>>61608633
Compiled.
Type inference.
Multi paradigm.
Dependency management using only git servers.
Lots of metaprogramming support.
Implicit functionality and DSLs.

Basically I want compiled Ruby with type inference.

>>61609723
what's wrongbwith templates?