What are the chances of this generating an image that actual

>>61584632
that looks like a dogo

>>61584632
Very low and very high. Depends on your imagination.

1 in 1*10^50

File: file.png (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

They're jpegs, so extremely close to 0 chance.

>>61584683
kek I thought I was the only one

>>61584683
>look and don't see it
>look again and it's right there
Holy shit

>>61584632
If you had infinite time, every image imaginable.

>>61584632
It's not true random, so the chance is actually 0. Not even joking.

>>61584872
Wrong. Computers aren't actually math machines.

> impossible
...
really anons?
https://babelia.libraryofbabel.info/imagebookmark2.cgi?A_woman

>>61584908
I suppose it depends how good the RNG is, what is 'true' randomness anyway?

>>61585046
>what is 'true' randomness anyway?
Geiger counter.

>>61585077
What do you mean with this. Geiger is a tube of inert gas that gets ionized by radiation. Electric conductivity in the tube increases with higher radiation level making it possible to extrapolate the dose rate. This is not random at all.

>>61584917
Spooky

>>61585177
The exact time a nucleus will decay is not predictable thus appears to be random. This is why it's used to set off the device that will kill the cat in the shrödingers cat thought experiment.

>>61584632
Somewhere between 0 and infinity.

>>61585331
>probability >1

>>61585177
Yea he's saying radiation is a random process which is correct

If you throw your hard drive I the microwave there's a chance you'll get a Bitcoin wallet if a million dollars

>>61585453
Well he's still not wrong

>>61586415
imma buy 100 microwaves and 1000000 hdds
being rich here I come