are all the ""arch"" users just antergos

>>61579334
I'm using plain old Arch, so the answer is no. Next!

>>61579402
isolated case

>>61579402
Me too!

>>61579334
I don't really see the point of antergos, when you got plain arch. You just prep your disk and install

>>61579415
You asked
>are all the ""arch"" users just antergos users being vague?
And I proved that there exists at least one ""arch"" user that is not using AntergOS, thus answering your question.

>>61579498
all != isolated case

>>61579529
∀ and ∃, contemplate them.

I'm not denying that there might be some ""arch"" users who are actually just using AntergOS, but that is not what you were asking.

>>61579640
But how do you know what I was really asking? You can merely interpret what I was asking from the words and syntax I provided, and if you interpret that wrong it is not my responsibility, as you are the one who read the thread of your own accord.

>>61579705
Which is precisely why you should reformulate your question as a statement using predicate calculus.