did yesteryear neckbeards take issue when people stopped using

bump
curious, sorry if i offended anybody

>comparing javashitscript with assembly

>>61553423
that's the opposite of what i did, friend

>>61552763
Only a irrelevant minority.
The gain in portability, productivity and maintainability was too important to ignore.
Also, this must have been in the late 60s or early 70s, so apart from Diejkstra (or whatever he was spelled) there weren't that many language shitposters.

File: wrgbc9HX.jpg (24KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x400px

Well web assembly will be a thing so beware


Beware.....

no, because the languages that replaced it were significantly better.

JS on the other hand is not better than any older language.

>>61554429
>a irrelevant
ok pajeet

Take your $5/hr code and shove it up your memory bloated ass.

>>61556929
>jerking off to typos