What's wrong with it? Seems pretty polished to me after

>>61536718
>not using Cinnamon on Arch with a decend gtk and icon theme

I see youre running gnome

Y too much space for the titlebar?

>>61536718
Right, now open up gnome-system-monitor and tell me what you see.

kde is better

It's not that bad I just prefer KDE. I don't even customize that much I usually just stick with almost stock settings + dark theme

>>61536859
An executive running linux?

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-24 07-20-28.png (86KB, 700x547px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 700x547px

>>61536841

>>61536718
I used to hate GNOME 3. After using DEs like XFCE and LXDE it just seemed so heavy and clunky. Now I use Fedora on a more powerful machine I actually can appreciate the way the DE works. It's still not perfect (none of them are), but it's another worthy option.

>>61536887
Why is CPU% always whacked in every GNU+Linux task/resource utility? It always reports 0% CPU usage, even when I know for a fact that my CPU is ramping up, or when the overall CPU graph is going crazy.

I haven't tried it in two years and recently installed it on an """ultrabook"""" on debian Sid. I am very impressed, considering moving to it on the desktop.

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-24 07-33-29.png (561KB, 1539x653px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1539x653px

>>61536901
huh wow, i just realized that
it seems like other programs give me other cpu usages though? i dont think theyre still that reasonable though

File: superior-kde-user.png (968KB, 1277x1281px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 1277x1281px

>>61536718

File: barleton.gif (34KB, 280x188px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 280x188px

>>61537820
this is cancer but god damn

>sweet and sour dog dick

KDE is superior, however I could not get composition to work without making my computer slow

And I want performance over features. At least wayland works pretty well with gnome.