Ordered this bad boy as a replacement for my old 22 inch display

>>61508190
> 370€
Top lel

File: halal.jpg (322KB, 531x471px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 531x471px

>>61509329
Such is life in Eurocco, Belgistan

>>61508190
>34"
>1080p

You could have done better.

>>61508190
Europfag here.
I think you should have wait at least 6 Months more. The 4k affordable meme is almost here.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-22 at 21.10.31.png (49KB, 321x380px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 321x380px

>>61509605
Sure I could, for 229 euro more that is.
LG 34UM88C for 599 was very appealing but out of reach for an unemployed neet like me.

File: ohwell.gif (481KB, 499x315px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 499x315px

>>61509669
I was just curious about ultra wide screens since I wanted to get dual/triple monitor setup anyways (code editor/ide on 1st screen, testing/console on 2nd and maybe browser/manpages/docs on 3rd) now I can do it all on 1 (hopefully) for a price of one 4k monitor.

And believe me, I've been living in this Beer/Chocolate/Moroccan infested village of a country far too long to know that in 6 months prices would still be where they are now.

File: specs.png (19KB, 464x426px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 464x426px

So, i want to buy a new monitor. I'm currently using a pretty generic 23" 1080p LG one and since i recently bought a GTX1080 i wanted to upgrade my resolution. Now, apparently 4k is kind of a meme from what i've read, being extremely hard to get good performance on and since i actually know basically nothing about monitors i wanted to ask if 2K monitors are worth it, and also about any other tips that could be useful when picking which one to buy.

That's a terrible resolution for that size.

I have a 25UM55 and paid 160 eurodollas for it and even at this size it doesn't feel all that pleasant.

I mean it's pretty ok but first I have to go look for movies that actually have this aspect ratio, which is a pain in the ass, and second there's a lot of stuff that doesn't really support this aspect ratio.

In any case, at the time I got it, a 2K monitor was more expensive.

File: DSC00010_LI.jpg (3MB, 4638x3478px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4638x3478px

>>61510966
>go look for movies that actually have this aspect ratio, which is a pain in the ass

like 99% of movies?

pic related all of my movies look like this. fits perfectly.

>>61511195
I find a lot of 16:9 around. Either that or most movies are crappy letterboxed 1080p rips

And of course every fucking TV show.

>>61511279
>And of course every fucking TV show.

True, that is what my 27in is for

>>61511279
90% of the programs and games I have work with 21:9, so i'm satisfied with my purchase. plus freesync is pretty good too.