Given the choice, would you buy a 60hz 4K AH-IPS monitor or 144hz

4K IPS
get the LG 27UD58-B

>>61494909
How worse is 1080p imagery on a 4k screen compared to a full hd one?

> Falling for the 144 Hz Meme

1ms g-sync TN beats any IPS

>>61494972
well, every square of 2x2 pixels represents one pixel

take that as you want

>>61495066
>implying that your 4ms advantage will help you outside of closed LANs

>>61495066
yes unless you move your eyes 1 inch and all colors are inverted

144hz is great, and IPS is great, so I choose to not be poor

>>61496541
>nice technology is expensive

yeah, nothing we can do about that

damn, I lowered the resolution on my screen so I could set it to 75Hz, and the difference is noticeable even with just 15Hz more

I got it back to 60Hz quickly so I don't become too spoiled right now, I have to hold on to these for a little more time

>>61494841
Honestly, I'd have to check them out first.
If the 1440p comes out passable in colours, then I'd probably choose it since I don't have a GPU capable of doing 4k at some great quality.
4k ips seems like a dream display though. Imagine the shitposting quality on something like that.

>>61494972
there's not much difference