Hey /g/, do you think AI will be able to think for itself in

>>61492470
Define "think for itself"

>>61492611
making your own opinions, choices and maybe having emotions idk..?

File: 60306943_p0.png (1MB, 1106x1276px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1106x1276px

>>61492470
Fucking tech illiterates
Why is /g/ so full of them now?

>>61492470

NO.

All AI, neural nets, machine learning and other bullcrap is just glorified statistics.

>>61492646
>making your own opinions

>>>import random
>>>opinions = ["I like it!", "I don't like it!"]
>>>Whats your favourite color?
>>>color = input()
>>>print(color + "? " + random.choice(opinions))

Holyshit I invented an AI

>>61492470
it would probably fuck your wife.

>>61492675
its what statistics should have been if the MIT jews hadnt pushed their own bullshit.

>>61492470
No, if you're 25 right now it won't happen even when your hypothetical grandkids are old.

File: 1487137509168.jpg (90KB, 630x583px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 630x583px

>>61492646
"opinions, choices and maybe having emotions" are evolutionary products resulted in natural selection. AIs are completely desgined by humans and opinions or emotions are never going to magically pop out unless desgined so.

>>61492470
>Hey /g/, do you think AI will be able to think for itself in our lifetime?
Yes, if you live until the 2050s or so.
>If so, what do you believe would be the result.
"The AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which it can use for something else. "

>>61492646
>He thinks that emotions are not some deterministic phenomenon based on chemicals
We're here to fuck and die, my dude. AI won't be the same as humans, it won't have the need

>>61492470
No. AI just takes a series of inputs and gives a series of outputs. Just like a mathmatical function.

File: praying_mantis___pic_5__by_talrex.jpg (325KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1024x768px

>>61492942
>We're here to fuck and die

File: bender-smoking.jpg (78KB, 450x334px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 450x334px

Why do those who want robots think it'll be like futurama with full personalities and everything?

>>61492964
Not at the same time maybe

>>61492470
It takes 20 years of training of a extremely complex highly concurrent neutral network with constant input of fine and highly tuned inputs from a system that has been developed from a genetic algorithm over millions of years to get an adult human consciousness.

If you can get a general purpose ai with the intelligence of an inbred retarded dog by 2100 I'd be amazed.

Interesting

>>61493163
A neural network is only an abstraction for the brain. Who knows what else goes on in there...

>>61492927
Law 1 mah nigga

>kill all species on earth
>go into power saving mode
so efficient

>>61492470
>""""think""""
question is, what if """we""" can't tell the difference? hmmmmm

>>61496064
The concept of harm is not some unambiguous thing that is trivial to implement in an artificial intelligence. You are also assuming that we will have the capacity to create explicit internal instructions like that in an AI. Depending on the development route that gives us AI this might not be the case.

>>61495979
>Neural networks simulate the literal inner workings of the human brain

I want this meme to die.