what the fuck

>>61434120
Google is using us to train missile drones that target cars
Fall back to legacy captcha or mislead it

Hmmm, Google is developing a self driving car while at the same time having people identify objects in images reminiscent to what you see why driving.

Is there any connection? No, there can't be, because I post on /g/ and I'm a fucking retard. Now excuse me while I debate endlessly over which version of Chrome will suggest the least amount of cuckold porn.

modern day slavery

you are literally working for free

This site has to be the single biggest contributor to Google's self-driving car technology after provincial Chinese children.

>>61434261
Nathan from Ex Machina was right all along

>>61434247
Not for free, for the website content.
That's why I feel justified using adblock, I already paid for the content by solving the captcha.

>>61434120
>>61434247

It's an ingenious way to prevent bots.
We use humans to verify humans by matching a response with human trained responses.
The system can learn anything the average person can verify easily. Originally it was words for OCR and now also images.

We use these systems to benefit machine learning; building and sharing libraries and tools.

Issues lie with the access to our collective data.
Should the data sets be open to the public?
Problems arise in how much can be made available without significantly affected the captcha system.
Already deep learning systems can break the current captchas.

>>61434247
>he wasn't on 4chan before captcha
lemayo

>doing my shitposting
>annoying as fuck captcha comes up that asks you to click until the image is gone
>clicking like a fucking mad man
>why the fuck do all of these images have street signs
>eventually all nine images just stop reappearing
>finally look and see that it wanted me to tap the images with cars
>it accepted it
Oops. Hopefully I didn't just kill someone.

>>61434120
>tap the wrong spot
>get arrested two years later for causing an accident
this is the future botnetters want

>>61434458
>>61434513

accept for the fact if you close and reopen the quick reply box 2-3 times it will automatically greencheck

CALLE CALLE

Buy a pass you cheap fucks.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-18-12-07-07-1.png (123KB, 720x1122px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 720x1122px

>>61434640
I would if I could do so anonymously.
Perhaps I should get prepaid Visa or something.
Until then, legacy it is.

>>61434659
Prepaid credit cards are not anonymous.
I got some from the bank the other day and they asked for an identification, and they logged my name and address from it to the receipt paper along with the card number so that they know who bought that specific card.

>>61434691
Really? Never bought one but that seems like extraordinary scenario.
Anyhow, I think you're not obliged to give them your name.
And I have no idea how to buy bitcoin btw.

>type what's in legacy captcha
>rejected
>use Swype and let it decide what it should be
>it's a wrong word but still accepted
The captcha system is already misled, that's why we struggle with it.

>>61434120

captcha does targeted psychological experiments on people individually and automatically, to see what they do in certain situations. it's not just making a mistake when it asks you to select something that isn't there.

>>61434691
You don't need to get a prepaid card from a bank. Also, bitcoin is an option.

Does anyone else feels that Captcha sometimes purposly won't let you pass it?
For example "Click on every image containing street sign" and you fail for the first time and few others, but when you put up with it you check it carefully with peak skepticism and you still fail.
That shit is annoying as fuck. I hate training your botnet!

>>61434949
No, they ask for more but I don't fail.

>>61434138
this. Google is evil. Stop helping them be evil.

>>61434492
>its only temporary guys

fucking moot

>>61434283
What a gay movie

>>61434952
For me it fails on purpose, when I stop and check everything is thicked and right.
It still fails.

>>61435209
I sincerely doubt it says you were wrong.

>>61434760

you mean like how it uses the same photographs of cars and street signs but changes what it asks you to select?

>>61434949

yes, i found out it requires 4+ "correct" clicks

when it would say "click the street signs" and they only take up 3 blocks, it proceeds to another question

when they take up 4 or more it accepts

>>61434583
>accept for the fact
Fucking summer kids. Go back to school.