function(table1, column1, table2, column2) or function(table1,

>>61419866

function(table1, column1);
function(table2, column2);

>>61419880

but what about when you need to do something with both?

const f = (table_column_tuple1, table_column_tuple2) => {
// code goes here
}

>>61419866
first one most of the time. more important question is

fun(returnvalue, input1, input2)

or

fun(input1, input2, returnvalue)

>>61419909

var1 = function(table1, column1);
var2 = function(table2, column2);

function2(var1, var2);

File: 4526.png (361KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 449x401px

>naming the folder "src" instead of "source"

wew lad, good thing you saved those 4 bytes, wouldn't want any extra BLOAT right?

>>61419866
Obviously

function([table1, table2], [column1, column2])

>>61419866
newArg().add(table.with(column)).append(
newArg().add(table.with(column)))

>>61419866

    table2.column2.function(table1.column1);

>>61422349
spotted the oop-tard