http://laptopmedia.com/news/intel-c ore-i5-8250u-is-coming-a

>1.6GHz clocklet

I can't wait for the throttling

>>61417604
Kaby Lake i5-7300U runs at 2.6ghz. This is a downgrade for most laptop uses.

>>61417604
>3.4Ghz single core
Literal garbage.
Clearly Intel never got their power gating under control if it can't turbo a single core to 4.0.

https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/cores/coffee_lake_u

You fags are beyond dumb, it's a quad-core CPU for the entire family, so it's faster than Kaby Lake dual-core

>>61417815
tell that to mac owners when their 2.9ghz quad core gets beaten by 2.6ghz dual cores

>Acer

>>61417815
>so it's faster than Kaby Lake dual-core
With a 600MHz lower single core turbo? Lol

>>61417907
https://ark.intel.com/products/97472/Intel-Core-i5-7300U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-3_50-GHz

100MHz slower for 2 more cores

You're just plain full retard

>>61417926
https://ark.intel.com/products/series/95544/7th-Generation-Intel-Core-i7-Processors#@Mobile

Lol, mobile U chips go up to 4.0GHz single core.

>>61417940
You're a full retard, this is the lowest end SKU, of course it's slower

The higher end SKUs will be clocked higher, something so simple yet you can't understand such a simple thing

>>61417952
So a new architecture is slower? Yet the part still costs >$200? That's okay?
Stop making excuses, no matter what it is, such a low single core clock for any kind of chip in 2017 is garbage.

>>61417926
Turboboost is a meme. You should look at the base clock.

>>61417604
Clocklets are fine when it's Intel

>>61417604
Raven Ridge APU when.

File: 320558.jpg (29KB, 225x350px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 225x350px

Are we at 10nm yet?

>>61417992
According to Intel 10nm was ready in Q1 2017

>>61417996
Well I'm not seeing it niqqua

>>61418004
You're using your eyes wrongly

>>61417604
> However, the jewel in the crown is definitely the new Core i5-8250U which has four cores with 3.4 GHz Turbo Boost frequency and 6MBs of LL cache.

Does it really have four cores, though?

I'm actually asking.

Intel U processors have a history of being dual-core, even for i7's. And marketing people like to claim two cores and four threads is a quad-core for some reason.

>>61418008
Ur using ur brain dumbly

Either way, I'm not falling for Intel's (((14mm+++))) bullshit again.
Kaby was identical to Skylake, which was almost identical to Broadwell. I doubt they're gonna shake things up now with Coffee Lake.

>>61418056
New Architectures are new architectures, they all are, just because you refuse to see the differences doesn't mean they aren't there.

A physics book is just a useless book to a poor person, but not to one with money

>>61418125
Kaby was just a Skylake stepping, the only differences were bugfixes.

I'm not joking, even the HEVC decode was already on die on Skylake, just non-functional.

thermal throttling machine. no thanks.

>>61417702
>>61417763
>>61417776
>>61417940

>2017
>paying any attention to clock