112 cores, 224 threads Cinebench below https://www.youtube.

>>61393677
Beats my 40 cores. But I only paid like $1300 for them.

>>61393677
>$12000+ CPU x4

That's a lot of cash to get a big cinebrunch score.

Also for comparison the EPYC version ($4000 per EPYC 7601 CPU) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32hTAooG98c

File: vegeta.png (311KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 640x480px

>>61393677
>just over 9000

File: 1382383399174.jpg (64KB, 600x334px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 600x334px

>Xeon Platinum 8180 x 4

That explain the massive iceberg break some days ago

intel is in full panic mode

>>61393677
So 4 8180's can't match 4 EPYC's based on those calculations (EPYC would be close to 10K considering two of them scored over 5K on Windows server 2016). The 8180's only scored around 9000.

>>61395379
CB shits itself when the core count gets really-really funny.
It's not a valid server benchmark.

>>61393677
why

>>61395466
Even so, it's that same for both.

>12000 vs 4000 dollaridoos per processor.
>Perform the same excepting more PCIe lanes on the EPYC.

>>61395466
Windows can't schedule shit fast enough, either.