Mozilla employee admits that privacy-invading professional software

>>61360555
He looks like a tremendous prancing la-la homo man

more like sellout

>>61360555
anyone that works anywhere remotely close to the vicinity of this industry has already known this. it's not an opinion it's fact.
Anyone who disagrees with this is retarded or a shill.

GA is leaps and bounds better than anything on the market.

File: 35225C4CFF744502BFE90D0DE1B77CFE1916700001AEC53287019.jpg (203KB, 381x424px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 381x424px

HOL' UP

are you tellin me

the same mozilla who cares more about diversity than shipping a product

the same mozilla that's dropping proper extension support to become another chrom* clone

the same mozilla that fired someone for having WRONG OPINIONS™

doesn't give a fuck about your privacy?

das some deep shit

nice bait

you can disable in about:config and you can even compile FF without it

>inb4 i use chrome heh heh

>>61360555
Everything is either botnet, shit, or just good only for casuals without room for power users. Even the /g/ recommended browsers like iridium still have the risk of botnet because it's a chromium fork. Maybe netrunner will work out, but given /g/ track record I doubt it.

File: lemming_poetry.png (4KB, 407x123px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 407x123px

>>61360555
Delet this

>>61360555
Mozilla is cancer, what else is new.

>>61360555
>open source
what you mean would be free-software like advocated by the free software foundation
pleb know the difference and mozilla is a open source company so no wonder they would hire someone with bad taste

>>61360875
>compile FF without it
how