WHY IS EVERY WEBSITE INTRODUCING 200-OR-LESS CHARACTER LIMITS

>>61301638
Dumb frogposter.

>>61301638
i dont hav any probs u ass

File: HARMA.jpg (108KB, 800x629px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 800x629px

>>61301638
>200-OR-LESS

this triggers the grammarian.

>>61301638
chinks are the only fags who can type out coherent and provoking thoughts in under 200 characters

>>61301638
Because ADHD kiddies can't read more than two sentences worth at a ti

>>61301638
This post is under 200 characters.

>>61301691
>Coherent and provoking thoughts

yeah it's really thought provoking to hear cutlery fall down flight of stairs

>>61302056
Probably because their moon runes represent whole words and not individual letters.

In the words of the immortal Terry A. Davis:
"Do it how a white man does it."

>>61302085

meant for

>>61301691

>>61301689
Rustles my jimmies

>>61301638
Quit typing long winded autistic responses and it wouldn't be a problem.

>>61302130
Your jokes aren't funny.

>500 word essay due friday
>haven't even started yet
fuck you /g/.

>>61302130
>more than 200 characters
>long winded

>>61301638
abcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrstabcdefghijklmnopqrst

test

This is part of the plot for chinks to make all of us 外人 convert to 日本ese. As the character limits get more stringent, our only way of communicating will be to shift to languages with more information per symbol.

>>61302412
Chinese and Japanese contain less information per syllable though, and it's way harder to type.
It's a shitty language except for decoration and Twitter.

>>61302483
>Chinese and Japanese contain less information per syllable though
true
>and it's way harder to type
how? you get used to it right away
>>61302483
>It's a shitty language
nah, it's fun, which is the only things languages should care about

>>61301638
What is stopping you from making your own website with NVARCHAR2(4000)?

Do you even do free open source software?

>>61302483
>Chinese and Japanese contain less information per syllable though
Why would that matter when the choice of ideograms can provide as much information as an entire dictionary definition and each character represents 1-2 syllables, dumbass? It's only an issue when you speak it, otherwise it's compact and information-dense.
Classical Chinese was even more laconic, allowing for those pithy micro-sentences that you can do in Latin for example thanks to declensions, except it didn't use declensions (as far as we know: we're not quite sure how it worked in spoken form.)

dumb and sensational posts don't need more than 250 chars

reason and arguments require more than that but this brings no money

>>61301638
So you can post via SMS

>>61302412
>ese
GB2 mexico