what's the difference between using archlinux and turning debian/ubuntu server into a desktop SO with proper packages?
>>61252276
the logo you can show using neofetch /s
the aur/debs
The amount of time you have to invest.
>>61252276
Just do a Devuan netinstall
Arch has a shitton of packages ready to use for stuff beyond open source software and also updates them faster.
It is like an unstable Debian unstable.
>>61253914
Arch is ridiculously bleeding edge and doesn't care if your old packages break when new ones come out.
Less likely to happen with Ubuntu and far less likely with Debian. "Less" customization if we're talking true flexibility to use all available software.
Maki is a goddess
>>61252276
Arch arguably gives you less control over your computer, because you are constantly under threat of updates (that you don't manage) breaking everything.
>>61254781
this
>>61255241
maki is ugly
>>61255254
>>61252276
Arch will blow up your configs from time to time. Debian config updating mechanism is top-notch.
>>61254752
who is this Maki whore you /g/uys keep spamming the board with?
>>61255259
still ugly
this fairy is cute though