AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT RYZEN CONFIRMED FOR HOUSEFIRE

>>61140262
7700k reigns supreme yet again

>>61140262
>performance per watt
so you care power consumption now?

File: images (1).jpg (12KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 205x246px

>>61140332
If it is 3x better probably everyone does

>>61140262
Looks like a poorly threaded benchmark.

>In this case, the i7-7700K offered better performance-per-Watt than the i9-7900X for this single-threaded test while it still came out ahead of the Ryzen 7 with this workload not running so well on Zen.

>single-threaded test

>Linux
>2017
Implying it won't take at least 5 years for GCC to catch up with new arch.

>http://accc.riken.jp/en/supercom/himenobmt/

suddenly synthetic benchmark become important again

>>61140262
I know this is bait, but we already know that ryzen is far more efficient than intel's current architecture

>>61140262
>The i9-7900X comes just ahead of the i7-7700K for the Himeno pressure solver that isn't multi-threaded, thus the only small difference in performance.

>>61140262
damn that's a shame because Poisson Pressure Solver is all I ever do

>>61140262
Ah so gaymur fags use less power when they barely use their CPU, got it.

>>61140262
>single-threaded

saged, hidden, wrote a letter to your parents informing them of their failure, sent an email to your boss telling him you're posting on /g/ at work

File: 1489329459496.png (1MB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1228x1502px

>>61140393
>>61140467
>>61140553
>>61140690
>>61140748
>>61140768
>>61140809
look at all that damage control
is this what amd tards actually believe?

File: Ryzen.png (72KB, 1112x833px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1112x833px

>>61141075

>>61141133
Too large to fit in picture: i9 7900X

File: 79000X.png (26KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 711x533px

>>61141163
I thought that was the correct one

>>61141075
I'm one of the people you quoted. I have an i5 in my system. This thread is still stupid

>>61141210
oh wow, a processor that is faster 10 times than poozen also uses more power. Im shocked

>>61141244
Why do you post? Get a life holy shit. Intel doesn't even pay you to do this.

>>61141133
>>61141210
Wait, so the 7900X actually ends up using more power than even the FX-9590? What the fuck

>>61141330
That ain't even fucking overclocked boy-o

"At a Vcore of 1.4V, the system stayed stable for 10 benchmark runs. Intel's Core i9-7900X consumed an average of 261W, while individual peaks jumped as high as 293W. A test at 4.8 GHz using 20 instances of a year-long shading computation for a rooftop photovoltaic array, including profit calculation, pushed power consumption all the way to 335W. The motherboard shut down after we started Prime95 without limiting AVX. The last recorded value was 364W."

>>61140262
So the reason why Skylake-X it's a literal housefire it's the uncore and not the clocks?
This really makes the mesh of bingbusses look even more awful, why the fuck leave the 3 bingbusses if your solution wrekts power consumption?

File: 87108.png (48KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 650x350px

>>61140262
Want to play Mr. benchmark cherrypicker? Check this out.

>7900X loses to 1600X

lol.

File: 7900X OC.png (668KB, 825x891px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 825x891px

>>61141330
>>61141375

>>61141375
>The motherboard shut down after we started Prime95 without limiting AVX. The last recorded value was 364W.
What the fuck? That sounds like a plane crash.
>>61141398
It a combination of bigger coarz with AVX-512 and ebinmail.

File: 87083.png (49KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 650x350px

>>61141413
And again, this time in a single threaded test.

>>61141416
>What the fuck? That sounds like a plane crash.
X299 is a hindenburg anon

none of the motherboards can handle overclocking without personal modification

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7BqAjC4ZCc&t=305s

File: 87081.png (47KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 650x350px

>>61141432
7900X hanging out way near the bottom here.

>>61141415
I wish I had perfect silicon every time I bought a CPU too.

I just love those threads.
It just gives me my laughing quota for the day.
The best move for Intel was to do fucking nothing.
Maybe cut price on 6900X/6950X.

>>61141524
How are they going to save money putting jizz in every CPU like that?

>>61141415
>power consumption was also reduced by 7%, [email protected]
Wew lads, we're safe.

File: 1486349045488.jpg (39KB, 429x421px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 429x421px

>>61140262
Rypoo was truly a mistake.

>>61141761
>didn't read the thread
Either OP or a shill, either way kys.

Come on.
There has to be someone that tested Skyfail-X on aircooling.
If not, it has to be done.

>>61141860
It literally can't be done, the systems shut down while booting from overheating

>>61141446
>Selling motherboard delidding kits NOW!

>>61141761
Stop shitting up every fucking thread with your anime shitposting plz
>>61139424
>>61140852
>>61139265
>>61139339

>>61141761
>rypoo
You should take a lesson from these:
>baby-lake
>intlel
>delid dis

>>61141906
You'd have to install a custom heatsink onto the VRM

At this point, why does Intel even bother installing the heatspreader?
Just ship it as is and let the user apply thermal paste.
Sell it as a feature, as always.

File: 1490904322214.png (53KB, 662x858px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 662x858px

>all these intel shills

>>61140262
>intel performs better on my poorly coded benchmark
whoa

>>61141966
links to this?

>>61142264
You'd have to source parts like what GN did for it's 480 hybrid, then use thermal adhesive most likely to attach the heatsinks to the board
16:16
https://youtu.be/_u9QvMAiJS4?t=974

>>61140262
>himeno
hahahahahahahahaha

>>61141562
with a binned cpu tho

File: amd3.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>>61141432
>>61141450
>>61141413
Nice fake benchmarks Ms Lisa

>>61143578
So provide your 100% true and unbiased benches.
inb4 muh gayms
inb4 day 1 benchmarks