>this is a video recorded in 2017 https://www.youtube.co

>>61138953
>nigger doesn't understand what streaming is

Video quality aside, why would you watch this garbage?

That is a good video, though.

>>61138979
>nigger doesn't understand that that's no excuse in the year 2000+17

why does the (((USA))) still have 3rd world tier internet?

>>61138998
because they are all third worldies

File: 7cd05e0064662c697c7599a6d5972414.png (493KB, 853x439px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 853x439px

>literally same video

>>61138953
Hardware video encoders look like shit.
SO DON'T FUCKING USE HARDWARE ENCODERS ON DESKTOPS AND EXPECT GOOD QUALITY

>>61139054
Wow its a keyframe.

>>61139069
>ON DESKTOPS
it's on a phone

>>61139086
Even worse then

>horrendous lighting outside ones controll
>probably uses a 4yr old phone because he's extremely cost-sensitive

>>61139129
It's on a phone with shitty internet. The phone would probably look passable if it was on a reliable connection.

>>61139137
>lighting
literally unrelated to this.

retard.

>>61138953
It looks comfy af

I fucking hate modern video quality

>>61139183
>It looks
like fucking legos
>I fucking hate modern video quality
t. gigantic homosexual hipster

>>61139147
it literally does "retard"

Tons of mid-range smartphones have issues with low light.

>>61139183
>comfy
It would only look comfy if it was actually low resolution. Trying to spread a small amount of bitrate on a HD video looks like shit.

>>61139198
>issues with low light.
ISO noise is not the topic of this thread nor the issue in the OP's pic.

retard.

>>61139198
You really think that the lego-ing of the video is related to lighting?
lol, what a retard

And no one actually watched the video