https://campaignagainstsexrobots.or g/ https://archive.fo/JeXKI

>>61118919
>implying they'll let you have a onahole
>implying they'll let you buy a sex doll
>implying they'll let you watch anime
>implying they'll let you play eroge
>implying they'll let you watch porn
Protip: Posts on feminists' blogs doesn't affect China/Japanese companies nor law.

File: hqdefault.jpg (11KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 480x360px

>they

>>61119245
This, feminists on panic mode.

sex robots for life.

>>61119245
>Posts on feminists' blogs doesn't affect China/Japanese companies nor law.

Nor anything desu senpai. They can cry as much as they want, it still won't make men want to touch them with anything but a 10 feet pole (side note: cuck orbiters don't count as "men" or humans for that matter).

At least RMS is on our side.

>>61118919
Just ban all vibrators and watch them squeal.

File: japan.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>implying you couldn't import from japan

>sex bots preemptively banned
>buy a domestic helper bot
>root it and update firmware
>buy new synthetic skin lower half from alixpress for $100 with customized genitals of your choice
>now have a functioning sex bot

You can't ban things like these, especially not when it comes to technology.

>>61119352
The real problem is that they could make it socially unacceptable, the kind of thing that makes it hard for you to get a job if anyone finds out.

>>61118919
>TLDR men won't marry us anymore waah!!

it's so funny that the only contributors and commenters on this website are women.

File: Capture.png (92KB, 767x786px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 767x786px

>>61119384
Shit, forgot pic

File: 1498276463346.jpg (75KB, 724x1024px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 724x1024px

>>61119245
>>61119346
This.

Can't wait to have a 2B sexbot.

>>61119395
your taste is so shit it's quite bothersome

however,

A2 is the shit.

>>61119380
Don't live in a shitty SJW country then.

>>61119407
No such option left in the West.

>>61119380
Nah, an intelligent and agile humanoid robot has too much potential value. They'd become so pervasive so quickly that they'd be impossible to stigmatize.
People who hire house keepers would get a robot instead. Nursing homes could be rendered near obsolete by robots, or at least they'd change elderly care entirely. Anyone with a disability could have a helper bot, people with severe autism, the blind, etc. You could have them function as a security system, alerting the authorities if anyone broke into your house while you were away.
If a company was selling a convincingly human fully functional robomaid everyone would want them. Hell I'd want one just to keep the house clean.

If the tech actually got to that point no one could do anything to stop it. It'd probably be one of the biggest industries on the planet.

File: 1496472273404.jpg (118KB, 724x1024px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 724x1024px

>>61119404
A2 is also fine, don't worry.

Feminists are the new puritans.

File: Prohibition.jpg (55KB, 400x391px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 400x391px

>>61119447
For what it's worth, the women's suffrage movement and the Temperance movement (the people who made the Prohibition happen) had a huge overlap, and both were overwhelmingly Protestant.

>>61119245
>onahole

holy shit what the fuck

>>61119346
why would you want to see those retarded animated hands

>>61118919
>Not catering to neckbeards and r9k faggots

Gud

>>61119336
No kidding.
https://stallman.org/articles/made-for-you.html

>>61119390
Most of the arguments are shit but the empathy one is perfectly valid if the bots end up being too similar to humans. Anime shit and the likes should be fine though.

>>61120347
It's funny because they utterly fail at empathizing with men.

this is the type of shit that makes us want to make/use sex robots instead

>>61119741
at least 3 of those people are trannies.
Why can't they make a movement without instantly turning it into a joke

>>61118919
>the whole world uses the word "Android" but don't actually know what it means
>somehow "Gynoid" is a forbidden concept even thought it's even more unheard of word.
Dude, its a humanoid and you use it to do whatever you want it to do.
Fucking idiots.

https://a.uguu.se/w6ohJUQr7Tbj_%28LecturesNotesinComputerScience_LectureNotesinArtificialIntelligenceLNAI10237%29AdrianDavidCheok%2CKateDevlin%2CDavidLevy%28eds.%29-LoveandSexwithRobots-Springer%282017%29.pdf

>>61118919
Hahahahaha wtf is this shit hahahah seriously nigga hahhaha like just get a gf hahahah lmao.

>>61121292
I do have a gf, she is 2D but that doesn't stop our love

>>61119390
>men are fed up with female bullshit
>have to include "muh chillunz" to get a reaction
They're losing and they know it.

>>61120289
>tfw they [spoiler]killed Storolon[/spoiler] T.T

>>61120289
>She will be free software, with control of her source code. We impose no constraints."

my fucking sides

>>61119245
Japan is going to go all out in ending their "creepy virgin culture" in 2020 in order to get that sweet Olympics money, dude.

>>61122806
Nah, Japan doesn't take permanent change like that. They're putting a sheet over their otaku culture stuff and then when the olympics is over they'll just go back to normal.

>>61122779
Proper robot sex industry ends with the cycle of abuse and crime of the human sex industry, take that feminists

>>61122899
I'd say its pretty likely that it would have a huge impact on reducing crime in those areas. Probably stop the spread of STDs to some degree too. You could have cheap brothels where people bang 10/10 robots, they get hosed out after each client, and theres no risk of disease transfer involved. That'd pretty much kill the concept of street walkers and the pimps who keep them under control with violence and drug addiction.

Really I can't see how anyone would stand against this tech becoming widespread and mainstream.

>>61122977
muh objectification

File: 1438352192438.png (10KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x300px

>>61123005
>i love your sexy personality babe
b-but what do you like about my body?
>i'm not objectifying

File: 1491504005618.png (292KB, 559x1402px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 559x1402px

>>61122977
>Really I can't see how anyone would stand against this tech becoming widespread and mainstream.
Because pic related (the part about women).

>>61122977
>Really I can't see how anyone would stand against this tech becoming widespread and mainstream.
You don't know women then.
They do understand that their value will drop significantly if realistic sexbots ever happen.

>>61120289

what a based god

>>61124234
I suppose you're right. They'd fight tooth and nail against anything that would force them to try and be better people.

>>61124274
Or even not better people, but just less fat ones.

But honestly, I can see "sex" bots being better people than most women. Or even most people.
All it takes is not being a cunt, which apparently is pretty hard.

>>61124274
>They'd fight tooth and nail against anything that would force them to date worse men.
FTFY.

>>61120289
wtf i love toejam now

>>61124323
I've emailed him a couple of times. He's such a sperg that he'll dedicate ungodly amounts of time to addressing any seemingly superficial point if it interests him enough.
You either get a two sentence reply, or you get an article.

I forget what shitty site I read it on but (((they))) are also already spreading FUD about how personal robots are too dangerous for home use because le infamous haXor 4chang could hack in wirelessly and make your robot shank your kids / you / your little dog too with a kitchen knife

File: 6938936-Young-woman-holds-knife-in-face-isolated-in-white-Stock-Photo.jpg (79KB, 1300x870px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1300x870px

>>61124397
Out now! The T-53X

>>61120289
>>61124367
GNU/RMS is a hero we need but do not deserve.

>>61124447
Who comes up with the ideas for these?

>>61124453
could you repeat that in spanish?

>>61124478
I don't have gettext installed

File: guilty_pleasues.jpg (125KB, 540x548px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 540x548px

>>61119390
>sexually objectifies women and children
>and children
>sexually
>...and therefore justifies their use as sex objects

Ofuck bois they know!

>femnazis to deny man-children fucktoys
>feminists hate men for disowning women
>mgtow hate hate women for disowning men
the circle of autism is complete. the millenial generation will not be able to reproduce in sufficient numbers and die out in favor of ethnic minorities.

in 5-10 years there will be a gold rush for the psychiatry industry when hoards of disillusioned faggots, traps, cucks, mgotws, feminists seek professional help after reaily bitch-slapped them around like a pair of soggy tits on truckstop stripper.

>>61125282
That's the most teenage post I've seen today.
You better be underage, otherwise you have no excuse for this degree of immaturity.

>>61125397
feminist detected post discarded

>>61122806
>he doesn't know that the Olympics actually hurts the economy

>>61125397
immature or not, if it's funny, i'll laugh, sonny jim. people being degenerates is comedy gold

>>61125542
So you snicker every time you pass a mirror?

File: ohh.jpg (61KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 960x720px

I suppose this market will be almost exclusively dominated by robots for (straight) men, just like porn already is?

>>61125584
sorry, you're alone with that habit.

>>61125683
You confused the computer screen with the mirror.

>>61125668
Depends what you call straight.
Will futabots and trapbots count?

>>61125745
yeah they are all made for men pretty much

sex robots are fucking retarded niche shit for kissless virgins who think it will make masturbation more enjoyable.

>>61125772
I kind of would like one like in that one blackmirror episode though

>>61125833
I don't watch smut so I didn't make it through the pilot of that show.

>>61125726
i don't have your brain, so that is not a problem for me.

>>61125772
imagine going to the park and seeing all those losers sitting by a café with their dolls, larping as boyfriends and having made-up conversations with their imaginary gf's. it will be funny as hell

>>61125871
the pilot was the worst episode desu

>>61125882
>imagine going to the park and seeing all those losers sitting by a café with their dolls, larping as boyfriends and having made-up conversations with their imaginary gf's. it will be funny as hell

I don't find mental illness funny.
I also think that 99% of that type of shit you see is done ironically.

>>61118919

They don't want to lose their sex market, they know they are fucked if men just really lose interest on real women, o hope it happens, these cunt better behave better now or they know what is going to happen

>>61120289
>When Sandra was three months old, she proudly told me that she had got a job designing meat vats, and that she had obtained adult status. "Now that I'm not your ward, we can make love." My virtual reality gear had the necessary features, so we did that right away.
RMS...

>>61125925
it's sad & i genuinely feel sorry for those guys who has to stoop as low as fucking dolls, but it's still funny, in a tragic-comical way. it's like that ol' sci-fi flick, cherry 2000

"In the year 2017, a rich man travels to the ends of the earth to find that the perfect woman is always under his nose. When successful businessman Sam Treadwell finds that his animatronic wife, Cherry model 2000 has shorted out, he hires sexy renegade tracker E. Johnson (Melanie Griffith) to find her exact duplicate. But as their journey to replace his perfect mate leads them into the treacherous and lawless region of The Zone, Treadwell learns the hard way that the perfect woman is made not of computer chips and diodes, but of real flesh and blood."
>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092746/

>>61126017
I was trying to imply that they do it as a joke or a cry for help, not because they actually enjoy it.

>>61125772
Probably would, just not worth the price

>>61126040
kinda like how bronies draw pony porn ironically, they fucking hate that shit for real but are committed to the artistry of ironically reproducing mlp erotica just because it's so totally not something they get off from...
>people will totally view fuckdolls as woman 2.0

>>61126017
Guy made the wrong choice in the end. Have you see the actress that plays the mercenary now? Would have been better off with his sexbot.

>>61125882
>i don't have your brain, so that is not a problem for me.
You're fine with not being able to tell apart a computer screen and a mirror?
That's not normal.
Though I guess not having a brain is a blessing in a way - you don't bother with problems, even the real ones.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/in-defence-of-sex-machines-why-trying-to-ban-sex-robot-1731611129

gizmodo is not against it? I'm pleasently surprised.

>>61118919
implying that biocunts in my country have any rights and/or are tken seriously

>>61126104
no, like i said, i don't have your brain, so i don't have such difficulties

If women lose the power of sex, they would lose any power they have in society.

We only pretend women are equals and pat then on the head so we can get some of that sweet, sweet ass.

If robots take over sex, women would be completely useless.

Of course women are scared to death of sex-bots.

>>61126181
>If robots take over sex, women would be completely useless.
>Of course women are scared to death of sex-bots.

This. If women lose their ability to control sex, they will literally become good for nothing, second class citizens.

>>61126140
No, you said you don't have such problems.
Your lack of brain makes you carefree, not free from difficulties.

>>61126181

The biggest threat to feminism is Sex Robots or Legalized Prostitution.

My buddy became a vegetarian for his wife. He fucking hates it. He'd probably divorce her in a heartbeat if he had alternate access to sex 24/7.

>>61126181
>If robots take over sex, women would be completely useless.
*ugh* I just can't... This is so... Just...
Women are much more than just sex.
There is also... um... wombs and breeding.

File: 1454592552291.jpg (147KB, 756x576px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 756x576px

>>61126212
>My buddy became a vegetarian for his wife.
He should thank her for showing him the light.
Sex is just a bonus.

>>61126212
>The biggest threat to feminism is Sex Robots or Legalized Prostitution.

Why do you think so many "feminists" oppose legalizing prostitution despite all the studies that it will reduce Human Trafficking, Slavery, & save thousands of womens lives?

Because feminists don't give a fuck about those women. They just want to control power however they can.

File: .png (45KB, 800x799px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 800x799px

>>61126096

>implying there won't be male fuckdolls that do the same thing

This isn't a 1 sided issue. Men and women will both have easier, safer access to mind-blowing sexual release that can be customized to a person's particular kinks. This is a good thing for both sides.

>>61126212

Your friend is an idiot. If he isn't compatible with his partner over something as petty as "waah she eats different than me", they should split up

File: kek24.webm (381KB, 640x266px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 640x266px

>>61120289
>sex robot starts rambling about how evil corporations are

>>61126201
no, i have a brain alright. it's just better than yours, thus i don't have the problems you're projecting with your faggy replies.

>>61126238
vegetarianism is a mental illness gateway into feminism, homosexuality & cuckolding

>>61126096
>kinda like how bronies draw pony porn ironically, they fucking hate that shit for real but are committed to the artistry of ironically reproducing mlp erotica
I wish unironically wish more people were this ironic.

>>61126335
>no, i have a brain alright.
You are trying really hard to prove otherwise.

>>61126281
>mind-blowing sexual release
>customized to a person's particular kinks
if you're normal, you don't suffer from degenerate, ocd-fueled kinks.

>>61126419
https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/6/27/15873072/google-porn-addiction-america-everybody-lies

Sure thing, buddy. Keep that Puritan Propaganda alive.

it would be nice to have a sexbo causr then i coul abuse someone with less consquenses

>>61124478
GNU/RMS es el heroe que necesitamos, no el que merecemos.

>>61126488

Sure, you should be able to get one for that. I would hope that you'd find it empty and unfulfilling and you could work your emotions past that to find something healthier for you, but whatever helps so long as you don't end up lashing out at an actual human before you get there.

File: 1497370703627.png (221KB, 451x542px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 451x542px

>>61122806
>sweet Olympics money

>>61126418
sure thing lil' buddy. no go play with your gook cartoons

>>61126443
when did i say i was puritan? i like fucking as much as my fellow man, and i'm pro both porn and prostitution... as long as it's straight. people who can't get off from a regular girl is sick in the head

>>61126634
>>61126418
Get a room, you two.

>>61126634
OK, that has to be a troll.
No one is this fucking retarded.

Right?

File: 1482034062310.jpg (34KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 720x404px

>>61120289
Dafuq did I just read.

>>61126669
so getting off to little girls, feets, getting pegged, pissed on or dominated by a woman is normal to you?

File: 1483379580005.jpg (54KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 612x612px

>>61126634
>i'm pro both porn and prostitution
absolutely degenerate

>>61126732
So you're a foot fetishist pedophile?
That would explain things.

It's always pedophiles who complain about everyone else for some reason. I guess you're compensating for the fact that everyone who isn't a pedophile hates you.

>>61125668
women can get fucked whenever they want, and even get fucking paid for it

>>61126716
Creative Commons Attribution Noderivs 3.0 robot romance.

>>61120289
Show me your heart!

>>61126780

Same with men. There's plenty of porn sites of people who get off to gay bears pounding straight guys. They'll even pay you for it too, so don't act like it's a "women only" thing, you just want to have easier access to sex because you're too fucking beta to get it yourself.

>>61120289
His self insert sci-fi fantasy literally ends with suicide and dancing in order to mind meld with his computer generated self modifying waifu, who is naturally free software.

>>61118919
Piracy is supposedly illegal

>>61126948
SANDRA
A
N
D
R
A

>>61120289
Helen O'Loy is a reference to https://my.fit.edu/~rosiene/delrey.pdf.

File: 1491241951171.gif (902KB, 500x494px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 500x494px

>>61126780
not necessarily

>>61126814
>Noderivs
That isn't very free, Doctor Stallman.

>>61120289
>"What I would resent is to be dumped into the world alone, as you were. When I think about what life is like for most persons — looking for love but not finding it, or losing it, or worrying about losing it — I feel terribly sad for all of you. Nobody should ever have to live that kind of life. In the future, I hope everyone will be born with a loving mate."
;_;

>>61127128
pretending to be a woman doesn't count

I seriously hope nobody here will use a propriety waifu unless you love the NSA remote listening and collecting telemetry

>>61123664
This entire post is predicated on the assumption that only female sexbots will exist, and there's no reason to believe that. A more likely scenario involves practically everyone (including Chad and Stacy) owning a sexbot so that only a small handful of people of either gender actually care enough about having sex with lots of other humans. You'll end up with a polyamorous subculture that consists of maybe 1-5% of the population with roughly equal numbers of men and women, and a much larger population that engages more widely in casual friendships with the opposite sex.

Also,
>Implying it's omegas that rape and not alphas

>>61127346
>This entire post is predicated on the assumption that only female sexbots will exist
You didn't read it carefully enough, or at least wrote your post as if you didn't. Reread the first paragraph. The author says that sexbots for men will be easier to make, implying there will be period of time when sexbots for men exist but sexbots for women don't. He writes about that period of time.
>>Implying it's omegas that rape and not alphas
Alphas don't need to rape.

So, /g/, what is your prediction for when sexbots become widely available and see the kind of price drop that smartphones did?
https://www.strawpoll.me/13309128

>>61118919
>>>61126181
>This. If women lose their ability to control sex, they will literally become good for nothing, second class citizens.
But muh children

>>61127793

>All these retards.

It would just give the same effect to tumblerites and ugly women.The average woman wouldn't need a bot since it is way easier for her to get sex.

If anything sexbots would only remove the betas and autists in their paths.

>>61127867
But women do want those betas and autists, even when they claim they don't.

For every desired man, there are at least 5 desiring women. They can't all get their prince charming.
And an old lonely woman has it way worse than an old lonely man. Not because of society, but because women are just inherently more dependent on their social circles.

Betas and autists don't want the women that exist and want the bots that don't exist yet.
Women do not want betas or autists, but are absolutely terrified of a future where betas and autists don't want them.

>>61122769
Fucking fascist commies. They literally killed him for not being neurotypical. He lacked an empathy module? Well, it doesn't mean he wasn't conscious. IRL psychopaths and autists lack empathy to various degrees but they are conscious as far as anyone can tell. Does RMS condone killing them and giving their organs to charity? Probably not.

>>61127950
>They can't all get their prince charming.

Why wouldn't they just get bots then?

>>61128260
Because they don't want from men what men want from women.
Bots replace women, but not men.

Men want something sexy, loyal, submissive (even when doing dominating sexual stuff), something that will ask what they want and give them that. A man prefers exclusive access to a worse product to sharing a slightly better one. A bot can be all of those.

Women want something handsome, dominating, that will make them want to serve it, but will carry them through their lives like a parent carries a child. Women prefer to share something considered good to exclusive access to something they can call their own. A bot may be handsome, but when bots become capable of carrying someone through their life, they will no longer need humans for anything.
Plus, a bot won't grant anyone status. Men can achieve status, women can only really inherit it or marry into it.

Will this finally solve overpopulation

>>61119395
>>61119404
>>61119425
Too bad both of them are awfully written characters with zero depth.

File: dremes2memes.jpg (439KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1280x1280px

>>61120289
10/10

File: 20120622-090726.png (100KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x800px

>>61129653
Only in white countries

>>61129823
who gives a shit?

>>61122977
>That'd pretty much kill the concept of street walkers and the pimps
So what job will the former hookers and pimps do now? Might actually increase crime.

>>61130067
Not white people, that's for sure!

File: 1470258204051.gif (2MB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x540px

>>61119390
What about male sex bots?

File: 1465933623026.jpg (37KB, 485x402px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 485x402px

>>61127334
> Robutts will be colecting data through her pussy sensors.
> Suddenly data on penis size will be 90% more accurate

>>61129715
>t. 9S

File: 1482577195351.jpg (12KB, 236x238px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x238px

>>61126335
You realize *hitler* (ceo of microsoft, famous wolfaboo, anti-smoking crusader, environmentalist, threw surprise party for Poland, amateur painter, etc.) was a vegetarian right?

>>61130772
He expressed admiration for vegetarianism, but was unable to stick to the diet.

File: 1482799494087.jpg (77KB, 959x721px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 959x721px

>>61118919
I love how they always imply that all the secksbutts will be female.

What if I want megatron to hold me up with his powerful mechanical arms and thrust his girthy robothood into my tight virgin rectum?

File: dr-kathleen-richardson.png (252KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1280x720px

>>61118919
>this is the person who started CASR

>>61118919
Feminism was off to a great start and then dumbass she-burgers had to ruin everything.

Even things that don't exist yet.

>>61130847
>What if I want megatron to hold me up with his powerful mechanical arms and thrust his girthy robothood into my tight virgin rectum?
Then they don't care about you. Duh.

>>61119418
A machine that can do what a human can without the food/water/oxygen/wages requirements will just replace humans.

>>61130790
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_and_vegetarianism
Its a good read.

Heres a good quote from the diary of Joseph Goebbels: "An extended chapter of our talk was devoted by the Führer to the vegetarian question. He believes more than ever that meat-eating is harmful to humanity. Of course he knows that during the war we cannot completely upset our food system. After the war, however, he intends to tackle this problem also. Maybe he is right. Certainly the arguments that he adduces in favor of his standpoint are very compelling."

Until 1937 he was not very strict, but after that his meat consumption reduced greatly. It seemed that throughout the progression of ww2 his consumption reduced further and further to virtually none. But of course accounts are conflicting.

He did lambaste Eva Braun for using makeup with animal products. And he did tell his inner circle gruesome descriptions of animal slaughter at the dinner table to try and convince them to be vegetarian. (He kind of fit the "annoying vegan" stereotype lol)

>>61128260
>Why wouldn't they just get bots then?
>implying women can be honest even to themselves

>>61130772
>hitler was the annoying vegan in his circle of friends
kek

>>61122806
>sweet Olympics money
kek

>>61130387
this is the real question lads

File: Loving an Onahole (Comic MILF 2013-02)[Fue] [English]{desudesu}_COMIC_MILF_2013_02_003.jpg (841KB, 1370x2000px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 1370x2000px

>>61118919
>implying they will do shit

File: hitler.jpg (36KB, 347x312px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 347x312px

>>61131011
>He kind of fit the "annoying vegan" stereotype lol

>>61131011
It's weird how he managed to be offended by gruesome slaughter of one kind of animal, then supported gruesome slaughter of other kinds (poles, russians, etc.).

>>61131148
Well I mean

they're poles dude

File: 1411662091389247696.png (478KB, 800x1232px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 800x1232px

>>61131171
b-b-but
we wuz hussars...

>>61126238

Don't chimpanzees regularly slaughter and eat (as well as fuck) other smaller animals in the wild? I remember a Nat Geo special that showed chimps cornering, tearing apart and subsequently eating an infant spider monkey.

>>61126096
>they fucking hate that shit for real
anon, i have some bad news for you

>>61118919
Anon a British company already sell sex bots they lost

>>61119413
Them take your country back

File: giphy-facebook_s.jpg (44KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x270px

>the year is 2068
>robot fems walk around
>full rights
>way smart
>robot fems decide to read 4chan for people who were against fem rights
>find out I was downloading robo fem hentai
>get knock on door
>why did you oppose women's rights anon
>bullet in brain
>it was good faps though
>mfw

>>61126238
This chart is BS
Humans are scavengers so we should eat both

>>61126123
Even fucking Saudi is slowly giving rights to woman

>>61126194
The real downfall of woman will when artificial wombs and eggless zygotes become a reality

>>61130387
meme because women couldn't get off to moneyless, unsuccessful bots.

>>61122977
>You could have cheap brothels where people bang 10/10 robots, they get hosed out after each client, and theres no risk of disease transfer involved.

I see someone else has been watching "Humans".

>>61132517
>artificial wombs
Already a thing desu.

>>61132608
That emulate the human womb?

>>61124397
You know that would make for an excellent filler episode in some GiTS-esque posgcyberpunk cop show.

>we dont need men
>but dont get something that replaces us
kek

I'd actually respect women more if they became independent and free like they claim they want to be, this is just sad

File: 130502161337-connie-culp-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg (132KB, 980x552px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 980x552px

>>61131331
Yes

Besides parasites, chimps are the only animal we should willingly exterminate, or at the very least, keep them out of zoos.

Anyone who willingly handles chimps is mentally deranged. Even chimps who've been lovingly cared for in captivity since birth will one day snap and fall into a berserk finger-ripping, genital-mutilating, eye-gouging rage for no reason. The strongest man in the world is nothing compared to a chimp. If it decides to kill you (or more likely, mangle you so terribly you won't even look human by the time it's done), you're fucking dead.

Fuck chimps

>>61118919
Who gives a fuck about some fringe group of pissed off women? 90% of engineers are dudes and sex robots WILL be made, and I for one will be in line to buy one.

>>61132444
>>robot fems walk around
>>full rights
this would be worse than the Terminator timeline

>>61126902
>he thinks porn is reality
mane

>>61129653
>overpopulation
nice meme mr. goldstein

>when the females of animal species become too bitchy and hard to deal with, the males just start raping them
>females eventually start developing countermeasures like the labyrinthine vaginas of the duck
>when human females become too bitchy and hard to deal with, the males build fuck bots since rape is bad
>females eventually start developing countermeasures like this shit

seems right

File: yin-yang-symbol-variant_318-50138.jpg (27KB, 626x626px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 626x626px

>>61134226
Yeah, its like the yuri and yaoi

>>61132813
Chimp: the pitbull of primates

>>61126773
i'm pro ero manga, games, hentai, 3dcg, whatever, but against actual porn of actual people, prostitution or other sex work.
when its fictional there arent any victims, drug abuse problems, or diseases or any shame for family members of the people in those industries.
making porn and prostitution illegal risks driving it undergroud, but legalizing it legitimizes and mainstreams it to the point of undermining social mores and cohesion. it atomizes, and alienates the individual and is a driver of social disintegration.
i think its better to have it illegal but with minimal or nominal enforcefent in only the most overt cases.
legal sexbots would help to dry up the black market demand for porn or other sex work, but i think that society must also incentivise (tax breaks, propaganda) monogamous heterosexual relationships to keep birthrates above replacement, and that there should also be a mild social taboo against owning sexbots to prevent it from becoming too mainstream.

I'd have to learn integrated shit to make my own waifu, right?

>>61134546
what about photorealistic drawings?

>>61134609
>3dcg
yes. if its fictional its fine. even peta doesnt give a fuck about violence against animals if its fake.
>>61126281
is the edge logo an intentional reference to sanic?
or am i crazy?
>>61128133
What else do you expect from "free" software?
Buy mit/bsd/wtfpl robots instead.

>>61134777
>even peta doesnt give a fuck about violence against animals if its fake.
I might be mixing this up, but didn't they complain about Pokemon a few years ago?

>>61134546
>i think that society must also incentivise (tax breaks, propaganda) monogamous heterosexual relationships to keep birthrates above replacement
That's a very wrong way to do it.
Monogamous heterosexual relationships only correlate somewhat (not strongly) with birthrate.

What you want is incentive towards raising children, not having a relationship of a particular type. Stable marriages with children in shared household, regardless of sexes of the partners.
Reward effects, not (overrated) potential.

Propaganda for heterosexual relationships is actually harmful, because it is nothing else than propaganda against marginalized groups. It benefits no one, establishes stigmatization as normal, which in turn prevents people with problems seeking help. Not just people from those marginalized groups.

>>61134854
>Ads for Coca-Cola are actually harmful, because it is nothing else than propaganda against Pepsi.

frankly, thats real retarded sir.

>heterosexual relationships only correlate somewhat (not strongly) with birthrate
thats fine. we dont need excess population.
current technology means gay/trans cant reproduce.
adoption means 3rd world children. foreigners deligitimize national claims to history, culture and so on.
this isnt a solution.
homos wre an important part of the ancient western tradition, but current "gay culture" is nothing less than a cancer

>>61135040
>frankly, thats real retarded sir.
Just because you don't understand how things work, doesn't mean the point isn't good.

The point is, you don't need propaganda for something almost everyone wants anyway. That's a stupid way to get them to get it. It's like
>drink water! those who don't drink water are idiots!
ads in the middle of Sahara - those who have water will feel smug satisfaction, the only change will be more exclusion of those who ran out of it because they must be idiots for not having it.

>thats fine. we dont need excess population.
Way to argue against the point you argued for just a moment ago.
>our population is too low, we need propaganda
>but not too much, because our propaganda will sure overshoot so much we will need to cut it down

>adoption means 3rd world children
Orphans and other children put for adoption outnumber potential adopted parents even without the need of mudbabies from outside.

>current "gay culture" is nothing less than a cancer
Those who are in "gay culture" don't want children and those who want children aren't a part of "gay culture".
In before
>but in that one boogieman case from 50 years ago, there was a kid at a parade

>>61134805
They did. Cooking Mama too.

>>61131331
Most herbivores are opportunistic carnivores, even. Horses, deer, and chickens will eat small animals, dead or alive, if they get the chance.

>>61134546
>it atomizes, and alienates the individual and is a driver of social disintegration.
You are fighting a losing battle; technology and markets inherently support individualism and atomization. The best you can hope for is building your little reservation where everybody is nice and living is communal while the world around you slowly crawls towards a posthuman future. Of course, the irony is that atomization will be exactly what allows others to join your neo-traditionalist effort or to stay out, thereby making it viable for you to find the right people.

>>61119265
The feminist's sexual revolution change society massively. The pill and family law courts (which heavily favour mothers I'm sure you're all aware) resulted in a massive shift in the social dynamic of courtship and family building.

I wonder if sex robots will change society to the same degree. Will it ever be socially acceptable for men to use sex toys in the same way it is for women? (talking about a dildo isn't really a faux pas but if you talked about your fleshlight everyone would freak the fuck out)

File: 1472433389935.gif (439KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 640x360px

>>61123664
How autistic was the person that wrote that shit?

>>61135250

PETA are a bunch of cucks who rag on things just for attention. They are all publicity stunts.

>>61135551
>talking about a dildo isn't really a faux pas
I may be an autist, but I'm still pretty sure it is.

>>61135570
>cucks
>because they fight for what they believe in

>>61135588
unfortunately their beliefs are retarded

>>61135588
>they fight for what they believe in

lol, you really think that's what PETA do?

>>61119346
This would get boring after about half an erection

>>61135596
They aren't, they're pretty solid once you think about them. But you never bothered to do that.

>>61135378
>technology and markets inherently support individualism and atomization
naturalistic fallacy.
technology is a tool. it has no particular goal or agenda, and can be used toward any end. "markets" in the real world are controlled by governments and by the fabulously wealthy. they are not "free" and they are driven by the agendas that these particular people have.
a free market is a hard thing to define - something that escapes the graps of most libertarians is that "market restrictions" can be a prefectly acceptable part of a free market, bacause part of being free means being free NOT to exchange goods and services. as for the "will of the market" you could reasonably claim that there are as many wills as there are people, or that the market is an integral over the wills of all people, or even that its divided into competing interest groups of more or less "freely" associating people.
i dont know were youre coming from with the "traditionalist" label. i'm in favor of a society without high levels of joblessness, depression, suicide, and such. if that sounds "traditionalist" than it is only superficially or incidentally so.
or perhaps it is you yourself who actually believe that traditionalism can solve these problems?
i have to note, however, that culture is a marketable commodity. it promotes tourism, and exportable products from cheese to tv shows.
globalization ends that.

>>61135623
nah dude, I'm a biologist. Shit's a haven for tree hugger "scientists" who love PETA. I've heard plenty of it.

I'm not saying we should allow the mistreatment of animals, but what these people preach about destroying all factory farming and "going back to the good old ways" simply isn't realistic. Same deal for basically every issue they're about.

Testing makeup on animals is evil? What else are you going to test on, humans? Better ethical guidelines is the solution, not banning all animal testing.

Name whatever issue you'd like and I can show you a PETA radical being unrealistic.

>>61135676
>I'm not saying we should allow the mistreatment of animals, but what these people preach about destroying all factory farming and "going back to the good old ways" simply isn't realistic.
Destroying all factory farming isn't unrealistic, just unfeasible due to social factors.
If factory farming was not profitable, it wouldn't be happening, because it simply doesn't need to be happening. It's a money and culture thing, not a standard of living thing.

Just because they can't abolish it all at once doesn't mean fighting it is wrong or stupid. No one will ever abolish all rape and murder, but that doesn't stop laws against rape and murder from being created.

>>61119384
they know that sexbots will make them worthless

>>61135707
>If factory farming was not profitable, it wouldn't be happening, because it simply doesn't need to be happening. It's a money and culture thing, not a standard of living thing.

How are you going to feed those increasingly dense cities with decreasing arable land?

>>61127334
GNU/Waifu pls

>>61135787
Feed them something orders of magnitude more efficient at giving them the necessary nutrients.
Warm-blooded animals are inefficient at nutrient conversion. Feeding them dense starches (as in typical factory farming setup) doesn't do this efficiency any good.
If we're talking plain nutrition with no memes and taboos, insect farming is pretty viable.

Eating meat every single week is nowhere near a necessity. Eating it every day is just plain excessive.
It's just money and culture that makes it look as anything else. Change where money goes and the culture will follow.

It won't be anymore legal than human slavery.

Reminder boston dynamics was kill because of robot abuse and (sociopathic/peer pressure pretend) empathy.
Same thing will be used to cripple the sexbot industry well before it even has the chance to lift off because it's easier to deal with a bud than it was with a tree.

>>61120289
This reads like an edgy 13-year-old's fanfic.

>>61135588
Fighting doesn't make you not a cuck.

I read some of those articles and they're such armchair psychology.
Basically, their entire premise is:
>if you have sex with an object, [magic "logic" happens here], therefore sex with an object causes women to be treated like objects
Sprinkled with a lot of "rape".

>>61127457
But an omega is not likely to be physically or mentally capable of rape.

File: 1497371721553.gif (980KB, 227x221px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 227x221px

>>61118919
>whores already screeching because the value of pussy will drop on the fucking ground like the
can't happen soon enough.

File: krzyk.jpg (23KB, 278x355px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 278x355px

>>61127457
>>61136220
Wizard here. Im scared to even shake hands with another human.
>mfw trying to rape

>>61127457
>Alphas don't need to rape.
Typical "rape" is just a man not asking a woman what she wants. ie. being alpha.

>>61135661
>naturalistic fallacy.
This isn't what "naturalistic fallacy" means. If you want to drop a fallacy on me there, I suggest "unsupported assertion".
>technology is a tool. it has no particular goal or agenda, and can be used toward any end.
Did you give the alternative enough thought? Have you seriously considered the perspective where you, Anonymous, are the tool that technology uses to propagate itself and advance it own goals? If not, I suggest you give yourself an introduction to the philosophy of technology and see if your outlook changes.
>they are not "free"
I said nothing about "free markets". I only said "markets".
>i dont know were youre coming from with the "traditionalist" label
At the core of every traditionalism is its opposition to atomization.
>globalization ends that
"Globalization" is a misleading term because it confuses two distinct things: the ability for global trade, communication and travel, and the tendency of the "the West" (United States) to impose its values upon the world. Both have the potential destroy tourism-worthy traditional culture, but only the later pursues it as a goal (ironically under the veil of doing the exact opposite).

>>61120289
Truly /ourguy/

>>61135913
>Reminder boston dynamics was kill because of robot abuse
[citation needed]

>>61136385
the only difference between sex and rape is whether or not the woman regrets it afterwards

File: g being optimistic.png (32KB, 657x615px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 657x615px

>>61127619

>>61136385
>>61136466
That's all fine and dandy, but >>61123664 didn't mean that kind of rape. The screencap is pretty clearly talking about the dark alley kind.

>>61127346
Male sexbots are too hard to make,make deep conversation ,need makes money,begin artist, travel around of world, just big dildo attach nice body won't work, women need high status,confident men, dildo with two legs don't work.

In female sexbot just sex and don't talk is enough

>>61136480
>The screencap is pretty clearly talking about the dark alley kind.
Well, that kind probably won't be affected by sexbots much.
Forcible rapists aren't the kind that faps and stops worrying.

>>61136396
deriving an ought from an is is literally the naturalistic fallacy. your claim was unsubstantiated and factually incorrect, but that is beside the point.
> you ... are the tool that technology uses to propagate itself and advance it own goals
anthropomorphizing inanimate objects (or ideas) is so unbelievably stupid that its hard for me to understand why any (otherwise) intelligent person would do it.
but ill entertain it briefly: humans are biological machines, and the tools of their gonads to keep replicating. the reason gonads are programmed to replicate is that aeons ago it was energetically favorable for some minerals to do so.
going back ever further, the only reason anything happens is because the entire fucking universe is lazy and wants to use the least energy possible.
"philosophy of technology" has no testable predictions. it is trivial to call it "not even wrong", but it also lacks any beauty, brilliance or new insights, and even fails to bring new clarity to old ones.
>traditionalism = opposition to atomisation.
i dont see how thats true. even so, my opposition to it is pragmatic rather than ideological. because some people or instiutions are stronger than others, collective action is needed to oppose them. moreover, lets not forget, in a thread about sexbots, that companionship and community is an essential human desire.
>"Globalization" is a misleading term
admittedly so. i hope from the context it was clear i was talking about the masochistic destruction of traditional cultures and ethnicities worldwide for the sake of smug moral superiority

File: 1469324501826.jpg (156KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 728x546px

>>61136728
>masochistic destruction of traditional cultures and ethnicities

>>61136775
:^)

>>61136728
>deriving an ought
Where did I derive an ought? "Technology and markets inherently support individualism and atomization" is unambiguously an "is" to me. (And saying that "X inherently supports [i.e., works in favor of] Y" isn't an "ought".)
>anthropomorphizing inanimate objects (or ideas) is so unbelievably stupid
True. I only meant "goal" in the non-cognitive sense, the way you might say an unintelligent piece of software has "goals" designed into it.
>but ill entertain it briefly: ...
You are either mocking the selfish gene theory, or are very close to reinventing it.
>"philosophy of technology" has no testable predictions
It has, and at a very basic level. If technology is merely a value-neutral tool, then you can use it towards any goals. If technology is imbued with values, then using it will tend to impose its values upon you.
>it also lacks any beauty, brilliance or new insights
https://a.rokket.space/8dwvao.pdf

>>61122806
The olympics are a waste of money. Retard.

>>61130387
maybe the future will come and face a reality of genders racing to obsolete the other first

and once that happens we shall be sworn enemies and war will rage across the cosmos

>>61137546
Women would need a lot of men to wage war.
The closest thing to sex war would be male separatists vs white knights

>>61137622
i think one can assume that in a world where one has obsoleted the other enough to do away with them they can transcend physical limitations

>>61137683
Unless AI waged war for women or women had superb numbers, they would surely lose a war with men, even if everyone was just brains in jars.
Men are naturally better at most things required in combat - reaction times, spatial orientation, stress resistance etc.

It's incredibly unfeasible for an actual sex war to happen. Slaughter could happen, if men decided to optimize needless variables away or women greatly outnumbered men due to social shenanigans, but not a war like one between countries.

Isnt a vibrator already the same thing?

>>61137821
yea

>>61123664
What kind of impact has internet porn had on humanity? I suppose it would be this, but at a lesser degree. I notice after watching porn, I am much less interested in my 6/10 gf, and am tempted more by 7/10+ women, who are out of my league. I have a loving gf, who's wife material, she's pretty much perfect, except the sex is kinda meh and she's a chestlet. I feel like porn corrodes my love for her and makes me think I should be going after 9/10s. I dunno how prevalent beta males (nice guys/cucks) have been in history, but I think internet porn could help explain it as a current phenomenon. 5/10 guys go for 9/10 girls and get friendzoned while the girl fucks a 9/10 guy. Realistically, the 5/10 should go for another 5/10, but because he jerks off every night to a 9/10, he subconsciously feels like fucking a 9/10 is obtainable for him.

>>61118919
Shit lets start a campaign against screw drivers.

>>61137889
>using "chestlet" as if it's somehow a bad thing
truly you have been poisoned

>>61126238
This is the dumbest fucking table I have ever seen.
If we're so genetically similar to monkeys they maybe we should start swinging from trees and stop using modern technology as well as not eating meat.

>>61137889
>5/10 guys go for 9/10 girls
Not really.
Many of them go for 3/10 and still get rejected, because the 3/10 women won't "stoop so low" as to dating someone only somewhat better than them.

>>61137930
Idk senpai my tits are bigger than hers
She looks like a loli desu (she's 20). No tits, a bit of an ass, really short, really cute face. But my dick is literally too wide for her vagina, like it legit hurts her and she bleeds, and she can't get her mouth past the head of my dick. Unless she lets me cum in her mouth, it doesn't physically feel too different than jacking myself off. I love her, but sex is frustrating and I get annoyed at all the people joking that I'm a pedophile. Makes me want a thicc curvy gal to have much better sex with, especially after seeing some porn of curvy russian women getting fucked in the ass, but I know in my heart that my gf is wife material. I'm a chubby 5.5/10 anyways, I ain't getting that kinda ass anytime soon.

>>61138017
If you're such an omnivore, why can you only extract proper nutrition from meat that is cooked?
Omnivores can eat large quantities of raw meat with no ill effects. Herbivores can eat cooked meat.

Eat a pound of tartare or GTFO.

>>61138070
are you teasing me?

>>61135575
It makes you look trashy/tacky to talk about your dildo, but you're a creep/pervert if you even own a Fleshlight, much less talk about it.

File: gender-wars-poster.jpg (191KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1440x1080px

>>61137683
>>61137622
>>61137546
>>61137757
>tfw I get to post this and it's almost on topic

>>61137235
i was so contemptuous of your intellect that i assumed, seeing that you were clearly supportive of "atomization" that the reason you mentioned the "is" was to provide evidence for the "ought".
n.b. i do support individualism, but the very definition of atomization is individualism carried to an extreme where it is no longer good.

my intent was not to mock selfish gene, but to mock "philosophy of technology" by deforming it into something else and at once demonstrate its lack of originality.
i guess it was a botch at least in terms of your understanding it.
>https://a.rokket.space/8dwvao.pdf
philosophy may be too kind a word for something that smacks so strongly of religion or cargo cult of "progress".
you are advocating a sort of meta-ethical proposition that morality derives or should derive from technology, rather than from human desires.
>If technology is imbued with values, then using it will tend to impose its values upon you.
this mistakes cause for effect.
technology is "imbued with value" only because there is something that humans valued before they created the technology, and that value is precisely the reason the technology was created.
"imposing values" is no more than an illusion generated by using problem solving and pattern recognition skills to realize that a solution applicable in one domain is also applicable in another.
again, this offers no original insight, and sounds an awful lot like the selfish gene stuff i mentioned earlier

>>61137821
No cause hamstering.

>>61138201
Hey Roissy, do you think RMS is alpha?

>>61132663
It has been done with sheep. I think its more of a question of ethics

File: smug.jpg (42KB, 547x471px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 547x471px

>>61118919
>females going apeshit because men are so superior that they're making full replacements for the whiney cunts
>women finally realize that they'll have to stop treating men like shit to compete
Absolutely beautiful. I can't wait to install Gentoo on my wife.

>>61138348
You'll install someone's Gentoo on your wife.
Not sure if it's more like cucking or fucking someone's daughter.

File: 142899601.png (100KB, 316x328px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 316x328px

I don't give a fuck about you taking away prostitution, sex toys, or anything.
Just stay away from my fucking AI waifu, you stupid bitch.

>>61138496
> I don't give a fuck about you taking away prostitution, sex toys, or anything
You should try both of them.

>>61120347
I don't know if it's actualy valid.

You can program a robot to desire to be with you and to value nothing more but to have sex with you. In that case, nothing would make it happier than doing just that.

>>61124397
I hadn't thought about that before. That's actually totally probable if the bots used internet, and even without it someone that hates you IRL that knew how to program that wouldn't need the internet, and they'd get away clean. Say the bot knows you don't like the person or you don't know them, the not could sound the alarms and alert authorities, but it wouldn't stop a friend or family member.

File: mekaku_city_ene.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x225px

>>61138496
This please I need AI enabled waifu skinned live2D bonzaibuddy chatbot on my desktop, it's my life's dream

>>61138929
But isn't pic related a human turned digital?

>>61138126
>philosophy may be too kind a word for something that smacks so strongly of religion or cargo cult of "progress".
Unless your idea of what constitutes a "cargo cult of 'progress'" is wildly different from mine, that summary is wrong. Have you read the book? We already live in a time where Utopian cults of "progress" are so ubiquitous they have become the dominant religion. The book makes a mockery of their naive beliefs, and not from the usual primitivist or conservative angle.
>you are advocating a sort of meta-ethical proposition that morality derives or should derive from technology, rather than from human desires.
Why would I be doing that? Plus, once again you see an "ought" in my post where none was intended. What I am suggesting is, to continue the genetic analogy, merely that technology that survives and secures wide adoption tends to not just satisfy human desires, but to do so in particular ways that drives adoption. In this sense it is imbued with values favored by evolution much like we are imbued with such values. However, its values and interests aren't necessarily the same as ours.

>>61139049
>technology is "imbued with value" only because there is something that humans valued before they created the technology
This can be taken to imply that all effects of technology are intended, which is obviously false. My point is that technology and economic competition have unintended as well intended effects, and the unintended effects tend to align with technology's and economic competition's "own interest" (don't take it literally) that most humans won't necessarily like. A big part of it is making people and things interchangeable as long as they implement a certain interface, because being able to replace people and things is a big competitive advantage. This leads to atomization, and you can't stop it without restricting competition and technology. An upside is that in a highly atomized society with rapid communication you may have an easier time finding people with whom to build an intentional community, real or virtual, that embraces your particular values than you would have in a more rooted society. The caveat is that it will be easier than ever for its members to leave, meaning that you will have to compete with others doing a similar thing. Thus, either competition because your value, or you isolate yourself, or your community dies.

>>61139124
>you isolate yourself
Meaning your community isolates itself.

File: 1419450748944.jpg (85KB, 400x307px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 400x307px

>>61138974
When can I turn digital? Will the true digitized age ever come?

>>61118919
ROBOT BODIES ROBOT RULES!

File: 524-114714.png (62KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 300x300px

>>61118919
>IN THIS ITT: virging males who can't get into a real relationship and now feel threatened of having their only chance at some form of sex taken away
lel

>>61140448
Will you be my gf?

>>61130575
He's a cunt too.

>>61140448
>virging

>>61140448
GOAT oil desu.

>>61140515
virgin /g/ males

>>61140448
Wait what? An eternal virgin like myself would love these.

Have any of you actually seen how creepy sex robots are?

File: 1473960261667.jpg (4MB, 4000x2992px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4000x2992px

>>61120289
Will we join in the crusade of this man?

>>61140678
Can't be any worse than a real woman

>>61120289
wtf I don't dislike RMS now

File: 1471108990710.jpg (6KB, 192x192px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 192x192px

>>61118919
So why don't women want beta virgin losers to have sex robots again? The same beta virgins who they don't want anyways?

>>61140709
Let's break down the pros and cons of each:
Real women:
+ Has personality
+ Can be a lifelong companion
+ Can have kids
+ Can still be attractive, can still give you sex
+ Can make food
+ Can play games or watch TV with you
- Can be annoying


Sex robots:
+ Attractive
+ Won't disobey you or be annoying
- Soulless, glass eyes
- Can only give you sex, with no emotions
- Dominating a human is thrilling, but dominating a tool is meh

Anything I missed, other than the basics?

>>61140801
>implying women don't actively want undesirable men to be unhappy

>>61140678
Just make them look like Drossel.

>>61126181

Exactly.

>>61141186
That's true, but do any of these companies even make sex robots who look like actual robots? I'd buy one of Magearna.

>>61140890
>+ Can be a lifelong companion
>+ Can have kids
>+ Can still be attractive, can still give you sex
>+ Can make food
>+ Can play games or watch TV with you

Those are not guaranteed though and here's another con.

-might not find woman with all of the above qualities

>>61120347
>le empathy meme
you realize that empathy is simply a mental mechanism developed in humans to ensure our survival and not some objective arbiter of morality, right?

>>61141423
>Those are not guaranteed though
Which is why I began those items of the list with 'can'.

>>61138601
>happier
>a robot
>feeling emotions

File: schopie.png (31KB, 662x166px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 662x166px

>>61140890
>Has personality
lmao
>Can be a lifelong companion
oh wow it gets better
>Can have kids
forcefully bringing someone into existence is inherently immoral
>Can still be attractive, can still give you sex
till they're like 35, they'll give you sex as long as you put up with their dumb shit
>Can make food
i don't know, my ex was a standard 20 year old and couldn't make shit, plus I like cooking anyway
>Can play games or watch TV with you
they're awful at games and lack the attention span to properly watch anything with you
>Can be annoying
got this right

>>61141544
angry misogynist coming through

>>61141544
Pretty standard bitter middle-aged person/nigger views expressed here, but at least the part about kids is a new one.

>>61141621
im pretty calm desu

>>61141626
it's almost like middle-aged people know more than us, because they've already put up with women's shit for half their lives, huh

>>61141649
I don't at all agree with your misogynistic views, but yeah I'm killing myself at 30 if I haven't impregnated and married a woman by then.

Do they make sex robots of animals?

>>61142045
>mfw the running four legged thing from boston dynamics

>>61142412
No, that's a dog/horse, cats and insects are more my speed.

File: fireballcharming_1.jpg (2MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x1200px

>>61141186
For reference.

>>61142483
What? I've been masturbating to a Disney character this whole time? Eh, doesn't make her any less sexy.

>>61119346
A Canadian already got arrested for receiving a sexdoll that looked underage fäm.

>>61140890
>Anything I missed, other than the basics?
The big guns: divorce, jealously and infidelity.

>>61119411
This isn't even remotely true. I've always strongly disagreed with the statement the episode was trying to make.

>>61142518
You have watched the show?

>>61142575
haven't*

>>61142481
I had a dream about being violated by a cat once

>>61142575
>>61142590
Of course, her smug personality is part of what makes her attractive. The femdom hentai involving her is off the chain, and I'm not even into femdom.

>>61142614
Was it hot?

>>61142626
a bit terrifying at the time

>>61142631
Was it hot?

>>61142646
I suppose a bit

>>61142626
>anon wants to be dominated by a robot
Now that's something I didn't expect to be a thing. I'll make a note in case I ever work on AI waifu startup.

>>61120289
>She will be free software
Probably the funniest thing I've ever read from RMS.

>>61142702
What's so absurd about it? The domination is more potent if the women is incredibly strong and is something to marvel at, such as a perfect white robot... it's far more logical than any of that urinating/farting/faeces fetish porn.

>>61142702
They're going to dominate us when they take over anyways.

>>61142770
I wasn't mocking you, anon. I was genuinely surprised because I thought any man who wants a sexbot would want one to be submissive.

>>61142893
I don't want a sexbot, they look too human.

File: 1496212493838.jpg (36KB, 300x417px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 300x417px

>>61143241
So disregard fleshbags, acquire robowaifu?

File: MagearnaAnime.jpg (112KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1200x675px

>>61143279
Not him, but I'd say you're onto something here.

File: 1469923743083.png (2MB, 1471x1010px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1471x1010px

Thread is sinking. Time to data mine.

File: 1479101843885.webm (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>61140890
>Can only give you sex

I'm sure we can program them to make some mean coffee

>>61143377
5, but 8 isn't without its charm.

>>61143377
That's a fascinating image, I'm saving it for sure.

File: 1490576228011.gif (1MB, 160x120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 160x120px

>>61143377
All of the above

>>61143522
WTF is that?

>>61143377
to what question should i pick my decision?

>>61143554
Preferred type/range.

File: 1477118217427.png (47KB, 651x436px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 651x436px

>>61143553
Inyoku Tokkyuu Zetsurinou

>>61143609
Danke.

>>61143590
preffered regards to what?

>>61143377
Would fuck all desu.

>>61143377
1-5
Never could get into mechs.

>>61143667
>fuck
With 8 it would be kind of difficult.

>>61143695
I will upload my mind and find a way.

>>61143695
>his ship doesn't have a onahole built directly into the console

>>61143716
Godspeed you, Dr. Stallman.

File: Ship.jpg (2MB, 1200x9300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x9300px

>>61143735
>>61143716
Fuck it, I'll post it.

File: Ship Interesting Places DLC.jpg (2MB, 1200x9300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x9300px

>>61143854

File: Celesteela.jpg (182KB, 1200x1080px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1200x1080px

>>61143377
She's a 7 on your chart, right?

>>61143854
>>61143890
Hnnnnnnng.

>>61143927
Not sure the scale even applies, but I'm leaning towards 6.

>>61143927
Kamitsurugi a cute, a cute!

>>61119390
>in response the numerous articles

can't even proof-read their own bullshit

>>61144268
This is a robot thread now get out.

>>61144376
We should have more of those.

File: cant deal with it.gif (449KB, 286x119px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 286x119px

>>61144268
but after reading the whole thing it's filled with weird sentence fragments that either make no sense or mean nothing. I would have thought something this "important" based on a paper written by multiple people would have a bit more effort put towards coherency.

:/