When you surf in the store's website ... what's more

3 obviously

File: image-7-1.jpg (120KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 640x640px

>>61116769
3- A functional website

I don't care how it looks or what it does, if it doesn't work well I immediately leave

Also websites that can't even render correctly without fuck tons of scripts are usually a massive red flag

I unironically prefer a website just made of black text on a white background over some clusterfuck of javascript trying to render some bullshit overlays and backgrounds

the notion that website design doesn't mean in the sense that it's navigable and suited for the user's needs is a pretty typical fallacy that basement dwellers fall into. rigorous UI/UX design means you test whether users can quickly navigate the interface to accomplish their goal, and running task load index tests like NASA-TLX to evaluate cognitive load and stuff.

1 and 3 are tied together unless you mean "nice website design" in the idiotic sense of "all the buttons were replaced with versions that look like they're shiny". i can't parse what 2 means. what's an innovator website? is there an example to give some intuition, if you can't offer a definition?

I use digikey and mouser for electronic components with zero issue.
Fucking 3.

2. I prefer a website that's nearly impossible to use, and uses 50MB of JS just to render the shopping cart.